https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911050
--- Comment #5 from Marcelo Barbosa ---
Jamie,
Same error:
fedora-review -b 911050 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 911050
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 911050
INFO: --> SRPM url:
http://jamielinux.fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911058
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Jamie Ngu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911058
--- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Thanks for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VxBt6bKhFA&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911058
Marcelo Barbosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||echevemas...@gmail.com
Fl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974714
Marcelo Barbosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||echevemas...@gmail.com
--- Comment #17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971103
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||echevemas...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967482
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #12 from Chri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967482
Douglas Schilling Landgraf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967482
Douglas Schilling Landgraf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967482
Douglas Schilling Landgraf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914936
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958059
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng ---
ERR in comment 7:
ignore "and for %{_usr}/lib, why not using:"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958059
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
Some "need to be fix":
1. Group/BuildRoot tag can be dropped.
2. BuildRequires: python-devel should be BuildRequires: python2-devel
3. Please change $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot}
4. No need to writ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967482
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng ---
NEW SPEC URL: http://cicku.me/tcpcopy.spec
NEW SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/tcpcopy-0.8.0-3.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912048
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: mpDris2 - |Review Request: mpdris2 -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974005
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from T.C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974005
--- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
I decided to make it require redhat-rpm-config, because things can be glitchy
without that. It Requires rpm, solving that issue.
Also, in nodejs-0.10.12-1 I moved ownership of /usr/share/node from
node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783016
--- Comment #8 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
@Morpheus, a argentinean colleague wants package this, You're interested still,
or I can close this review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974343
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from T.C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924901
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924900
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974343
--- Comment #4 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
I expanded the abbreviations and also added an explanation of what ASN.1
actually is:
%description
nodejs-asn1 is a library for encoding and decoding Abstract Syntax Notation One
(ASN.1) datatypes in pu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974341
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from T.C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974341
--- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-ctype.spec
SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-ctype-0.5.3-1.fc19.src.rpm
* Fri Jun 21 2013 T.C. Hollingsworth - 0.5.3-2
- fix spelling in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974347
--- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: nodejs-assert-plus
Short Description: Extra assertions on top of node's assert module
Owners: patches jamielinux
Branches: f19 f18 el6
Initia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974350
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from T.C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974350
--- Comment #4 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-http-signature.spec
SRPM:
http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-http-signature-0.10.0-2.fc19.src.rpm
* Fri Jun 21 2013 T.C. Hollingsworth - 0.10.0-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974350
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974350
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Issues:
===
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
I've just realised the tst/ folder isn't included and tap apparently exits with
zero status if the directory is missing. The tests will need to be p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974350
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974343
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885038
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885038
--- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts ---
I'm pretty sure that Blokus is a registered trademark, and it looks to me that
it's not being used correctly in this package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Trademarks_in_Summary_or_Des
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974341
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974347
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974347
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974343
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Also, in the full description (not the summary), I think it would be good to
expand the ASN.1, BER and DER abbreviations (followed by the acronym in
brackets).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974343
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974341
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974005
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974005
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-sou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974005
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911058
--- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Oops, my fault. Fixed!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HNxBRgEauC&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960720
Pete MacKinnon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Pete Ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855331
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||976330
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890771
--- Comment #7 from Michael Scherer ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974714
--- Comment #16 from Srinivas Pandruvada
---
Hi Marcelo,
I did regenerate and upload. I don't see this error. This is what I did to test
the uploaded SRPM:
- Emptied my ~/rpmbuild sub-folder contents. So no RPM or SPEC file, tar files
exists
- w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890771
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||admil...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976442
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Hi Marcelo,
My FAS username is puiterwijk.
Thanks in advance for the review!
Regarding the deps: They are not actually required to run the program, but are
required for some of the backends supported.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958059
--- Comment #6 from Andrea Veri ---
Upstream seems to be active again, the package should be ready to go:
1. a LICENSE file has been included with the correct license, GPLv3
2. fixed the require to be yum-plugin-fastermirror, I don't plan to mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973084
--- Comment #15 from marcin.du...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Björn Esser from comment #14)
> Package is fine now, except for License-Tag in spec:
>
> 's!BSD$!& with advertising!'
the /usr/share/doc/htmlcleaner-2.2.1/licence.txt file
looks to me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975266
--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ---
Awesome, thanks. I will be away for a long weekend but I'll try to carve out
some time this evening to give this a full review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911058
--- Comment #2 from Marcelo Barbosa ---
Jamie,
This package erro in downloading:
$ fedora-review -b 911058
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 911058
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 911058
INFO: --> SRPM url:
http://jamielinux.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911058
Marcelo Barbosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975266
--- Comment #2 from Ben Rosser ---
Alright, then I've fixed that issue- cmap-japan now owns /usr/share/cmap, and
the other packages will as well.
Spec URL: http://venus.arosser.com/fedora/cmap/cmap-japan.spec
SRPM URL: http://venus.arosser.com/f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841266
--- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts ---
There are only very limited situations where it is permissible to modify the
upstream source archive. Basically when we cannot distribute some part of it
due to legal reasons.
Please either detail the leg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911048
--- Comment #5 from Marcelo Barbosa ---
Jamie,
Okay, i'm looking others tickets, i go catch other bugzillas, we go adjust
all packages.
Thank you.
Marcelo Barbosa
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911050
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Hi there, thanks for taking this review.
Please note that this review depends on nodejs-dep-graph, which is already in
rawhide but not yet in stable for f18/19.
You can point fedora-review at rawhide like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911050
--- Comment #3 from Marcelo Barbosa ---
Hi Jamie,
I'm reviewing your package, but view error to use fedora-review in your
package:
$ fedora-review -b 911050
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 911050
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 9110
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969830
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-buddycloud-http-api/nodejs-grip.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-buddycloud-http-api/SRPMS/nodejs-grip-0.1.5-2.fc19.src.rpm
* Thu Ju
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911048
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Hi Marcelo, thanks for picking this up! You'll want to review the two bugs that
this package depends on first though, which is why the package can't install
properly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911048
--- Comment #3 from Marcelo Barbosa ---
Hi Jamie,
I'm reviewing your package, please see this issues:
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:G
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911040
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/nodejs-muffin.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/SRPMS/nodejs-muffin-0.9.0-2.fc19.src.rpm
* Thu Jun 20 2013 Jami
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911058
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/nodejs-url2.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/SRPMS/nodejs-url2-0.0.0-2.fc19.src.rpm
* Thu Jun 20 2013 Jamie Ng
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911050
Marcelo Barbosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911050
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/nodejs-snockets.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/SRPMS/nodejs-snockets-1.3.8-3.fc19.src.rpm
* Thu Jun 20 2013
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911048
Marcelo Barbosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976468
--- Comment #1 from Marcelo Barbosa ---
Hi Adam,
I'm reviewing your package, please see this issues:
Issues:
===
- gems should require rubygems package
Note: Requires: rubygems missing in rubygem-teamocil-doc
See: http://fedoraprojec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976468
Marcelo Barbosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976468
Marcelo Barbosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976468
Marcelo Barbosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911048
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/nodejs-q-io.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/SRPMS/nodejs-q-io-1.7.3-1.fc19.src.rpm
* Thu Jun 20 2013 Jamie Ng
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911037
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/nodejs-jsconfig.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/buddycloud-server/SRPMS/nodejs-jsconfig-0.2.0-2.fc19.src.rpm
* Thu Jun 20 2013
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919933
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839740
--- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Okay. We just need these two people to confirm their licenses. I might suggest
CC-BY if they have no preference.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919933
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-py2neo-1.5-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-py2neo-1.5-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919933
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919933
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-py2neo-1.5-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-py2neo-1.5-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911040
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||911037
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911037
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||911040
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911180
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|nodejs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911180
--- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/mocha/nodejs-expect-dot-js.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/mocha/SRPMS/nodejs-expect-dot-js-0.2.0-4.fc19.src.rpm
* Thu Jun 20 2013 Jamie Nguyen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965007
--- Comment #14 from Björn Esser ---
(In reply to Guillaume Kulakowski from comment #13)
Hi Guillaume! Sorry for the little delay. :)
> some question :
> - Why modify github Source0 ? I have followed the guideline :
> http://fedoraproject.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976442
Marcelo Barbosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973448
Marcelo Barbosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912816
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853055
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976220
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974492
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957693
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839740
--- Comment #8 from Damian Wrobel ---
> No, since he is not the creator of those files
Locking only inside the files we're finally installing (as the rest of them are
already installed by the crrcsim package) gives the information about two
auth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974714
--- Comment #15 from Marcelo Barbosa ---
Srinivas,
You execute new changes in your .spec file, do you have generate your
packages again:
$ rpmlint -bs .spec.file
And:
$ rpmlint -ba .spec.file
Look this error again:
OUTUPUT:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919933
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919933
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=19NT4Y3xtz&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919933
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Jamie Ngu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973084
--- Comment #14 from Björn Esser ---
Package is fine now, except for License-Tag in spec:
's!BSD$!& with advertising!'
#
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919933
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974714
--- Comment #14 from Srinivas Pandruvada
---
Hi Marcelo,
Spec URL: http://spandruvada.fedorapeople.org/thermal_daemon.spec
SRPM URL:
http://spandruvada.fedorapeople.org/thermal_daemon-1.02-4.fc19.src.rpm
I didn't understand "post in commentary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924900
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919932
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
