https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977132
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977133
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977136
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976777
--- Comment #2 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/node_modules/nodejs-i2c.spec
SRPM:
http://patches.fedorapeople.org/node_modules/nodejs-i2c-0.1.3-2.fc19.src.rpm
* Wed Jun 26 2013 T.C. Hollingsworth - 0.1.3-2
- fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958059
--- Comment #13 from Andrea Veri ---
Ah good catch, otherwise I would actually have to bump the date on the posttag
everytime a new change has to happen on the package. Something like
"1.20130621svn12%{dist}" should do it then :)
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967357
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972943
--- Comment #12 from Alec Leamas ---
Tom: thanks!
Kashyap: new links:
spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/lpf/3/lpf.spec
srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/lpf/3/lpf-0-3.46ae0c3.fc18.src.rpm
Changelog:
* Sun Jun 23 2013 Alec Leamas - 0-3.fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972943
--- Comment #11 from Kashyap Chamarthy ---
Thanks Tom, for your comment.
So, Alec, I assume you'd be providing updated SPEC/SRPM with the said examples
elided (is that the right assumption?), so that this review can proceed
further.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972943
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844721
--- Comment #34 from Luis Bazan ---
No more conflicts!
I can close this BZ?
Regards!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sQj9Ytv0fh&a=c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892597
--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata ---
You'll need to buildrequire the following:
- perl (called in spec)
- perl(Getopt::Long), ./configure:26
- perl(POSIX), ./configure:27
Don't use absolute paths in your spec.
Call perl simply 'perl' (preferre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967357
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-phyghtmap-1.45-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-phyghtmap-1.45-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967357
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-phyghtmap-1.45-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-phyghtmap-1.45-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967357
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-phyghtmap-1.45-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-phyghtmap-1.45-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967357
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978358
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885038
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978358
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
hi
there are some problem:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:compile (default-compile) on
project wildfly-security-manager: Compilation failure
[ERROR]
/builddir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #18 from Rex Dieter ---
and, please do not simply use GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+, fedora-legal has already
commented that this special KDE case with "KDE e.V. may determine that future
GPL versions are accepted" cannot use this variant, and re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #21 from Joseph Marrero ---
Ahh thanks for the links, reeding...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GTg1J2Cq4j&a=cc_unsubscr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #20 from Joseph Marrero ---
Thanks Rex for the correct way of doing this.
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/homerun/homerun.spec
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/homerun/homerun-1.0.0-3.fc19.src.rpm
old pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #19 from Rex Dieter ---
For background, see thread that includes:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-February/001541.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter ---
well, strictly, there is an option 3, simply:
# KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
License: GPLv2 or GPLv3
since this does accurately reflect the combined work of everything, but th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978010
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata ---
Ok, the deps are all wrong :)
What you actually need to BR:
perl, perl(Exporter), perl(lib), perl(strict), perl(Wx::build::MakeMaker), and
wxGTK-devel
ExtUtils::MakeMaker is only used if Wx::build::MakeMaker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #16 from Mario Blättermann ---
You can define it separately for each package:
Name: homerun
Version:1.0.0
Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:KDE Application Launcher
License:GPLv2+
%package libs
Sum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter ---
2 options:
1. basically follow my suggestion in comment #12:
in main pkg near top include the snippet (with comment):
# KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
License: GPLv2 or GPLv3
a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978381
Bug ID: 978381
Summary: Review Request: dleyna-core - Utilities for higher
level dLeyna libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #14 from Joseph Marrero ---
i.e. Like this:
License:GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+
#GPLv2+ for the main package and LGPLv2+ for the libs package.
??
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Un
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #13 from Joseph Marrero ---
GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ only then? And both go in the license tag only?
Or should I make a comment specifying that the GPLv2+ is for the main package
and the LGPLv2+ goes to the libs package?
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #12 from Mario Blättermann ---
Please recognize the latest comment from Rex Dieter regarding the licenses:
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #10)
> main pkg:
> # KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
> Licens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Joseph Marrero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jmarr...@gmail.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882482
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959654
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960720
Pete MacKinnon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978358
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|nob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959653
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
--- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter ---
fwiw, I disagree with the recommendation in comment #8 wrt licensing, this
should be sufficient to include in the .spec:
main pkg:
# KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
License: GPLv2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978358
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978358
Bug ID: 978358
Summary: Review Request: wildfly-security-manager - WildFly
Security Manager
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959652
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976919
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #18 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon-1.1.8-2.fc18.src.rpm
- replace mvn-rpmbuild with mvn_build
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978345
Bug ID: 978345
Summary: Review Request: libtiff3 - backwards compatibility for
libtiff
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959650
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964161
Petr Hracek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmarr...@gmail.com
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953718
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959648
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959647
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977646
--- Comment #1 from marcin.du...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- No %config files under /usr.
Note: %config(no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894413
--- Comment #24 from marcin.du...@gmail.com ---
I'm sorry - discard it - wrong bug!
I(In reply to Marcin.Dulak from comment #23)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894413
--- Comment #23 from marcin.du...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- No %config files under /usr.
Note: %config(n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958094
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977646
marcin.du...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt ---
Rest assured, it wouldn't be the first project to do that. Project name "foo"
releases library with SONAME libfoo.so.N in tarball "libfoo" with headers in
/usr/include/foo (#include ) and using root direct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978284
Bug ID: 978284
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-redis - A Ruby client library
for Redis
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965570
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913254
Pavel Zhukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||977986
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890771
--- Comment #8 from Dan Mashal ---
Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/edje.spec
SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/edje-1.7.7-2.fc19.src.rpm
Description:
Abstract GUI layout and animation object library.
Added mime db scriptlets.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Bug 855780 depends on bug 977901, which changed state.
Bug 977901 Summary: java-service-wrapper: Wrong installation directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977901
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Bug 855780 depends on bug 977904, which changed state.
Bug 977904 Summary: java-service-wrapper: Please install Maven POM file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977904
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892597
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978010
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
101 - 165 of 165 matches
Mail list logo