https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827723
--- Comment #11 from Shakthi Kannan ---
Updated to gnuhealth-1.6.1 and tested on Fedora 18:
SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/gnuhealth.spec
SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gnuhealth-1.6.1-1.fc18.src.rpm
Successful
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981839
Bug ID: 981839
Summary: Review Request: quotatool - Command-line utility for
filesystem quotas
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980071
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974714
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927458
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng ---
Issues:
===
1. Header files in -devel subpackage. Quoted from rpmlint result:
qbs.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/qbs/imports/qbs/base/qmlapplicationviewer/qmlapplicationviewer_qt5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng ---
Created attachment 769525
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=769525&action=edit
QBS License Check
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980071
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng ---
Created attachment 769536
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=769536&action=edit
python-xpyb License Check
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980071
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
Better than before:
1. I've found that rpmlint warned of license mixture:
Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 39 files hav
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979702
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Tr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981707
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Graf ---
Fixed:
* BuildRequires typo s/libnl-devel/libnl3-devel/
* Removed %{buildroot} deletion in install
INFO: Done(bmon-3.1-1.fc19.src.rpm) Config(fedora-19-x86_64) 1 minutes 40
seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981707
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tg...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981834
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt ---
Christopher, please slow down a bit. Verify output from fedora-review
carefully.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981707
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng ---
Review from the first URL of SRPM, not sure if this one.
Many issues:
1. 2 files with unknown license
include/bmon/defs.h
include/bmon/list.h
2. In %files section, %{_sysconfdir}/bmon.conf should be:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #11)
> Christopher, please slow down a bit. Verify output from fedora-review
> carefully.
Please give me a hand if possible...
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977117
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hugh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt ---
> 2. Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory.
> …
> Verify they are not in ld path.
They are plug-ins in a path local to the application. The package does not
adjust the run-time linker's s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977118
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #14 from Erik Schilling ---
> 1. Header files in -devel subpackage. Quoted from rpmlint result:
Those header / source files are required by the qbs-qt package. They allow you
to simply define a QmlApplication {} with qbs without need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977129
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt ---
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qbs-git
>
> As you can see, "The Qt Build Suite" is nice.
Well, good summaries sum up what the package contains. They don't just repeat
the name of a program (or exp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851292
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Sandro Man
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com,
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980960
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||opensou...@till.name,
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977130
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977130
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
Also I don't think the "generation" directory needs to be packaged - that is
just the code used for generating the tables under the "encoding" directory.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977134
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920348
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978381
Debarshi Ray changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977135
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981707
Thomas Graf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tg...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Graf ---
(In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977120
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981834
--- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981834
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977117
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Jamie Ngu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977118
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Damn, I should really have realised this...
I'll packaged the original dateformat separately.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981707
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977118
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||981863
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981863
Bug ID: 981863
Summary: Review Request: dateformat - A simple way to format
dates and times according to a user-specified mask
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981863
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||977118
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977118
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|981863 |
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
The on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981863
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|977118 |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977118
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||981863
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981863
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977118
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen ---
(In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #3)
> The only problem is that I think the npm one has local changes that aren't
> in the upstream...
Oh, err, I didn't even think of that. Damn... Well I suppose no harm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981863
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
- Should be a noarch packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981863
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/grunt/dateformat.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/grunt/SRPMS/dateformat-1.2.3-2.fc19.src.rpm
* Sat Jul 06 2013 Jamie Nguyen - 1.2.3-2
- own all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981834
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
THe toplevel dir is included, not sure about why you said that RPM had unowned
dirs. Can you tell me?
FYI I update the egginfo in files.
No %check now, because check will fail. Please ignore.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981863
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hugh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981863
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: dateformat
Short Description: A simple way to format dates and times according to a
user-specified mask
Owners: jamielinux
Branches: f18 f19 el6
In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981863
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977120
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
(In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #1)
> [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
>
> nodejs-eventemitter2.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) namespaces ->
> name spaces, name-spaces, names pace
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977120
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hugh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981806
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977120
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Ngu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978177
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng ---
NEW SPEC URL: http://cicku.me/birdfont.spec
NEW SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/birdfont-0.21-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981807
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981806
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981806
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Jamie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981806
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Well logically this entire package is a devel package... Would we have an
ordinary package with just package.json and then the src directory in a -devel
package? Which one should the docs go in...
As I said on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981807
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981812
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981807
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Jamie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981806
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen ---
(In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #3)
> Well logically this entire package is a devel package... Would we have an
> ordinary package with just package.json and then the src directory in a
> -devel package?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981812
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: spelling-error %descripti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981806
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Tom Hughes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981807
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978177
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt ---
> ./configure
Add a comment that explains why %configure cannot be used.
> Requires: libbirdfont
This is the reverse case for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978177
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
Yes, there are some problem with doit, in fact this package cannot get PASS in
the test.
I knew these, but then I found doit has bugs so I just rpmbuild -bs then
upload.
I will wait.
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919697
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
glassfish-servlet-api-3.1.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glassfish-servlet-api-3.1.0-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858818
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
sugar-srilanka-1-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-srilanka-1-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858818
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
sugar-srilanka-1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-srilanka-1-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858818
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
sugar-srilanka-1-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-srilanka-1-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858818
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980071
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt ---
There are a few more packaging mistakes:
* /usr/include/xpyb.h includes Python and xcb headers, so python-xpyb-devel is
missing dependencies
* the pkgconfig file links with libxcb, so python-xpyb-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980222
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973904
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|libserf-1.2.1-3.fc19|libserf-1.2.1-3.el6
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981834
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3)
> THe toplevel dir is included, not sure about why you said that RPM had
> unowned dirs. Can you tell me?
I refer to its subdirectory named 'programs'.
See
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851292
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2MyfEKu5lV&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851292
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959669
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959669
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cYHXIhtnuB&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967133
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967133
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=I2un7YWNLh&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975279
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975279
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NlANQ9h0xq&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975281
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975281
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qMvU1x81IC&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977117
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=itXhaLV9ga&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977117
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977120
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978381
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977120
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1LpIr1xiWe&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980318
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Requested package name gistis doesn't match bug summary gists, please
correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978381
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cFu0I0OOLQ&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980318
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981807
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zTqXVmfSRI&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981807
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo