https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991693
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth ---
Yes, if a package is supportable in EPEL-5 (i.e. doesn't have dependencies that
aren't there), I always try to support it there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991666
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991666
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
OK.
Ignore my last question at comment 1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UIynWYpVOO&a=cc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991666
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||991924
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991666
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||991874
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991666
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||991903
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991666
--- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> Why not shipping static files this time?
Because we've a policy in Fedora to avoid static libs whenever possible, and
there does not seem to be a need for h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807821
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng ---
Ok.
But this depends on my spare time.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KoFIDDrZ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970009
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #42
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991753
--- Comment #5 from Parag ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: mph-2b-damase-fonts
Short Description: Free font encoding many non-Latin scripts
Owners: pnemade
Branches: f19 f18
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991725
--- Comment #5 from Parag ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Lingua-EN-Alphabet-Shaw
Short Description: Transliterate the Latin to Shavian alphabets
Owners: pnemade
Branches: f19 f18
InitialCC:
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991725
Parag changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991753
Parag changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968857
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from T
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991753
--- Comment #4 from Parag ---
Thanks for the quick review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JohsOjEFLe&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991725
--- Comment #4 from Parag ---
Thanks for the quick review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eyAuEuZXgE&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968857
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tchollingswo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968857
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||992322
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992322
Bug ID: 992322
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-minimist - Parse argument
options in Node.js
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991725
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968857
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991753
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972590
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
sugar-starchart-15-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-starchart-15-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972590
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972590
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
sugar-starchart-15-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-starchart-15-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991725
--- Comment #2 from Parag ---
Spec URL:
http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/perl-Lingua-EN-Alphabet-Shaw.spec
SRPM URL:
http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/perl-Lingua-EN-Alphabet-Shaw-0.64-2.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991370
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991753
--- Comment #2 from Parag ---
yes its OK to leave %prep blank. It depends on how the source archive is? zip,
tar extracting either with %{name}-%{version} or %{name} or just without
creating any directory.
AFAICS, In font info its written "Pub
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Ed Santiago from comment #4)
Oh I forgot to cleanup my brain ;)
Manpage should be installed to destdit mandir/man1 with install.
Then RPM will automatically gzip them.
Fixed.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988728
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng ---
NEW version released.
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/chinese-calendar.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/chinese-calendar-0.7.9-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971236
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
sugar-deducto-9-5.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-deducto-9-5.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988728
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng ---
No API docs yet, maybe upstream thinks that they've provided compatible API,
just view Nacl's is OK, or whatever...
The useless doc issues have been submitted upstream.
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/libsod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987395
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991319
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991294
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971236
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
sugar-deducto-9-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-deducto-9-5.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971236
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967689
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #6)
> (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
>
> > SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/tsung-1.5.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
>
> 404
Internet connection was disturbed, plea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991666
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991725
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991693
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991724
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991753
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989791
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #1)
> A *.desktop file needs to be installed explicitely or validated:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage
Fixed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991836
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870853
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng ---
Hi,
I can see "%doc README COPYING" 3 times.
Please only ship one time. I suggest shipping them in main package.
And, what does it mean?> --disable-ext2fs --disable-gmime
Thanks.
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984321
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989859
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng ---
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/libxls.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/libxls-1.3.4-3.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987731
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
qt4pas-2.5-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt4pas-2.5-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987731
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987395
--- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3)
> No test. Test requires autobahn module, which is not packaged.
>
> I can't find a reason why not running a test.
You answer the question yourself. autobah
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870853
--- Comment #8 from Davide Benini ---
(In reply to Veaceslav Mindru from comment #6)
Hi Veaceslav,
> rpmlint -i SPECS/haven.spec
These seem to be rpmlint false positives.
Please check previous comments.
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986175
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-cairocffi-0.5.1-2.fc |python-cairocffi-0.5.1-2.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991836
Bug ID: 991836
Summary: python-ctrldaemon - Service command wrapper for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989800
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986172
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986608
Bug 986608 depends on bug 986715, which changed state.
Bug 986715 Summary: Review Request: python-cairocffi - cffi-based cairo
bindings for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870853
--- Comment #7 from Davide Benini ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
Hi Christopher,
> 1. Why not nameing it safehaven but haven?
To be aligned with upstream name.
> 2. %define _hardened_build 1
I've made the suggested chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958585
--- Comment #10 from Rich Mattes ---
Hi Roger, thanks for chipping in.
I'm a fan of cmake so I went ahead and used it, but if the makefiles are a
better way of doing things on Linux then I don't have any problem switching to
them. I'll make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972480
--- Comment #6 from Rich Mattes ---
So i've been playing with unar, but it's kind of a pain to get to work with the
%setup macro. I think it's much less of a headache to just use the create
tarball script (which is repeatable) until upstream c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983961
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|pyqt-m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989791
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989859
--- Comment #9 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Is it something you expect to be valuable for people? If not, drop it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116
--- Comment #14 from Volker Fröhlich ---
This one works for me on F18. I noticed a relevant error message though:
- Open Pgmodeler, "File New"
- Add some table and close the consecutive dialogue
- Exit without saving
"Unable to write the mode
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986175
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
jackson-module-jaxb-annotations-2.2.2-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jackson-module-jaxb-annotations-2.2.2-2.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986175
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985231
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
jackson-dataformat-smile-2.2.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jackson-dataformat-smile-2.2.2-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984321
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #5)
> Just search http://www.amazon.de or http://google.de for "powerline" and
> you'll see.
I now did, and I see your point :)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984321
--- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4)
> (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> > > Description isn't very useful, u
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991639
--- Comment #10 from efigue ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #9)
> Created attachment 782418 [details]
> one way to fix the spec
I uploaded the new version.
Vielen Dank für Ihre Hilfe
Eric
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984321
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #3)
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> > Description isn't very useful, unless one knows what "Powerline" is.
> ACK.
>
> I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986172
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986172
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
jackson-databind-2.2.2-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jackson-databind-2.2.2-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986165
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986170
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116
--- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
---
Please look at new version.
- Repository moved to bitbucket.org.
- Crashhandler naming issue resolved:
https://bitbucket.org/pgmodeler/pgmodeler/issue/282/please-move-crashhandler-to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990268
--- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- update-desktop-database is invoked when required
Note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990268
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgrul...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990269
--- Comment #2 from Jan Grulich ---
Probably the documentation should be in separate subpackage, because it seems
to be quite large.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990269
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jan G
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990269
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgrul...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990278
--- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- update-desktop-database is invoked when required
Note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910340
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt ---
Yes, this will need some fixes and another look.
* Run rpmlint (or rpmlint -I for more helpful output) on the src.rpm *and* all
built rpms. Feel free to ignore obvious false positives in the report, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987395
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #4)
> I'm unsure what info you need from me?
Ok.
Question: Is there a reason to disable tests a.k.a. %check section?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991753
Bug ID: 991753
Summary: Review Request: mph-2b-damase-fonts - Free font
encoding many non-Latin scripts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991531
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt ---
> Requires: sysstat,perl(Text::BarGraph)
If you specified such requirements on separate lines
Requires: sysstat
Requires: perl(Text::BarGraph)
you could add comments more easily. Interesting h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990278
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgrul...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989143
--- Comment #2 from Axilleas Pipinellis ---
Fixed both, thank you.
SPEC:
http://axilleas.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/rubygem-charlock_holmes/rubygem-charlock_holmes.spec
SRPM:
http://axilleas.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/rubygem-charlock_holmes/rubygem-cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987395
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(pbrobinson@gmail. |
|com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985814
Simone Caronni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |needinfo+
--- Comment #15 from Simone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807821
--- Comment #11 from Vedran Miletić ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #10)
> I may have a try, but can you provide your spec/SRPM?
Both are here: http://inf2.uniri.hr/~vedranm/ns3fedora/
Most of the plumbing work has been done, b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991639
--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt ---
Created attachment 782418
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=782418&action=edit
one way to fix the spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991639
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt ---
Hmmm, then some more work is needed. I didn't pay attention to where the locale
dir is installed in the python module path. Embarrassing. Of course that
created "files listed twice" warnings. Sorry! But
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967333
--- Comment #4 from Anuj More ---
Updated:
Spec URL:
http://anujmore.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/rubygem-code_analyzer/rubygem-code_analyzer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://anujmore.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/rubygem-code_analyzer/rubygem-code_analyzer-0.3.1-2.fc1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967334
--- Comment #5 from Anuj More ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: rubygem-connection_pool
Short Description: Generic connection pool for Ruby
Owners: anujmore axilleas
Branches: f19
InitialCC:
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967335
--- Comment #5 from Anuj More ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: rubygem-dotenv
Short Description: Loads environment variables from `.env`
Owners: anujmore axilleas
Branches: f19
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo