https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949895
--- Comment #5 from Honza Horak ---
Thanks, it looks fine, except the last two issues probably:
- packaging header file /usr/include/python3.3m/bsddb3/bsddb.h is not necessary
IMHO. Or is there any reason to do so?
- BSD license file should b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012837
Bug ID: 1012837
Summary: Review Request: sxhkd - A simple X hotkey daemon
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969220
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990815
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990817
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012450
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009153
Pete MacKinnon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #15 from Pet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037
Bug ID: 1013037
Summary: Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013039
Bug ID: 1013039
Summary: Review Request: java-diff-utils - diff utils for Java
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013039
Will Benton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1010003 (bigdata-review)
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012837
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013039
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013039
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013039
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
> Name should be 'diffutils' as the aId of the pom file
sorry forgot 'diffutils' pkg is already present in Fedora repo...
leave java-diff-utils or use java-diffut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013039
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
i would like to take this review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wgB5mc0f8R&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013039
--- Comment #4 from Will Benton ---
Spec URL: http://freevariable.com/java-diff-utils/java-diffutils.spec
SRPM URL:
http://freevariable.com/java-diff-utils/java-diffutils-1.3.0-2.fc19.src.rpm
Description: The DiffUtils library for computing di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013039
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|java-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012169
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967485
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|nf3d-0.8-1.fc19 |nf3d-0.8-1.el6
--- Comment #13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009153
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009153
--- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
There's no such thing as a f21 branch yet...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009997
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=100
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013039
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Created attachment 804113
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=804113&action=edit
review notes
not approved
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013039
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
please, report a bug @ http://code.google.com/p/java-diff-utils/issues/
for "source package does not include license text(s)"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Un
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013039
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013095
Bug ID: 1013095
Summary: Review Request: cube -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013095
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
Summary|Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010334
Salim Fadhley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
29 matches
Mail list logo