https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017546
Bug ID: 1017546
Summary: Review Request: tika - Apache Tika
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017546
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015867
--- Comment #5 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Hi Mosaab
I would like have this package in Fedora repositories, would be nice for end
users to have a gui for conky.
- naming of the spec is wrong, the name must be the same of the upstream, just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015867
--- Comment #6 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
Thank You ,, I'll fix .
But in BR we need (vala) to build conky-manger , vala-devel will be extra .
Even vala-devel require vala but only vala does what we need .
Regards
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015867
--- Comment #7 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
Use GPLv3+ instead of GPL2 ??
-
> one question, themepacks should be compressed for run?
Yes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015867
--- Comment #8 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
Ok, All done.
Spec : http://ojuba.org/oji/SPECS/conky-manager.spec
SRPM : http://ojuba.org/oji/SRPMS/conky-manager-1.2.0.1-2.oji.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #2 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
Hosted at Ojuba server , Alot of fixes after many packages revision :)
Spec : http://ojuba.org/oji/SPECS/amiri-fonts.spec
SRPM : http://ojuba.org/oji/SRPMS/amiri-fonts-0.106-2.oji.fc19.src.rpm
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017546
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017628
Bug ID: 1017628
Summary: Review Request: solr - Apache Solr
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017628
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017546
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
> sorry but this bug is a duplicate of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002721
and for other projects is strictly required build/import also the pars
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017546
--- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> and for other projects is strictly required build/import also the parser
> sub-module
Which other projects? For example infinispan required the parsers modul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-cssmin-0.1.4-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cssmin-0.1.4-5.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-cssmin-0.1.4-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cssmin-0.1.4-5.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
python-cssmin-0.1.4-5.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cssmin-0.1.4-5.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017645
Bug ID: 1017645
Summary: Review Request: hibernate-search - Hibernate Search
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017645
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017628
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1017645
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017546
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1017645
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017678
Bug ID: 1017678
Summary: Review Request: hibernate-hql - Hibernate Query Parser
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017678
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017645
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1017678
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904640
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Ken Dreyer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #5 from Ken Dreyer ---
You're quite right. I didn't realize that the gemspec doesn't use double
quotation marks once we regenerate it. Thanks.
I've adjusted the first sed regex, and removed the second sed operation (now
that the f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865699
--- Comment #24 from Sam Tuke ---
Woot!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852623
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Jit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906486
Jos de Kloe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852623
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852623
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865699
--- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865699
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008059
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008059
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821455
--- Comment #9 from Jos de Kloe ---
Hi Christian,
I'm sorry for the delay. Today I looked again at your review request, and
still have some problems.
The command:
fedora-review -b 821455 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
now indeed finds the spec f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876317
--- Comment #8 from Matthew Miller ---
Updated with version number from in the file rather than just the date as on
the web page.
Spec URL: http://mattdm.fedorapeople.org/ec2-metadata.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~mattdm/ec2-metada
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
--- Comment #21 from Sandro Mani ---
SPEC: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder.spec
SRPM: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/pbuilder-0.215-4.fc21.src.rpm
* Thu Oct 10 2013 Sandro Mani - 0.215-4
- Improve README.fedora
- Add some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876317
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karlthe...@gmail.com
Assignee|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766
Bug ID: 1017766
Summary: Review Request: caladea-fonts - The sanserif font
which is metric-compatible with Cambria font
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017767
Bug ID: 1017767
Summary: Review Request: carlito-fonts - The sanserif font
which is metric-compatible with Calibri font
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766
Parag changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproj
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017767
Parag changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproj
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876317
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Haï
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013375
HAYASHI Kentaro changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865699
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865699
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
ladish-2-1.3.gitfcb16ae.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ladish-2-1.3.gitfcb16ae.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865699
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
ladish-2-1.3.gitfcb16ae.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ladish-2-1.3.gitfcb16ae.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865699
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
ladish-2-1.3.gitfcb16ae.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ladish-2-1.3.gitfcb16ae.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966223
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-mysql-2.0.0-alpha9.2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-mysql-2.0.0-alpha9.2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876317
Matthew Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Matt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876317
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876317
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965895
Marek Mahut changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Marek
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017202
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017814
Bug ID: 1017814
Summary: Review Request: rwhoisd - ARIN's Referral WHOIS server
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919703
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #25 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891170
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002707
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017767
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
Please try to keep the package naming consistent with noto and droid
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017767
--- Comment #3 from Parag ---
you mean adding the google as a foundry name?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017767
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
yes (unless you have a better name in mind)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017767
Parag changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|carlito-font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766
Parag changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|caladea-font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876317
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
ec2-metadata-0.1.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ec2-metadata-0.1.1-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766
--- Comment #3 from Parag ---
updated font information page ->
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Google_Caladea_fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017767
--- Comment #6 from Parag ---
updated font information page ->
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Google_Carlito_fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876317
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
ec2-metadata-0.1.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ec2-metadata-0.1.1-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Ken Drey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766
Yohan Graterol changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016753
Yohan Graterol changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016753
--- Comment #2 from Yohan Graterol ---
Hello Troy,
The some issues:
1 - The last version is 0.2.3 not 0.2.2, please update to the last version.
2 - I see test in the package, please add the macro %check or you should
indicate if the test don
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016753
--- Comment #3 from Yohan Graterol ---
[0] https://raw.github.com/mongodb/js-bson/master/package.json
[1] https://npmjs.org/package/nan
[2] https://npmjs.org/package/one
[3] https://npmjs.org/package/nodeunit
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016753
--- Comment #4 from Yohan Graterol ---
Oh, I skipped one dependency: "gleak" (https://npmjs.org/package/gleak).
Please check it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
"ruby-sig" is not a valid FAS account.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016803
--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> [ ] = Manual review needed
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016803
--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6)
> This problem is intricate.
> 'xfc4-icon-theme' and 'rodent-icon-theme' share various directories except
>
> %{_datadir}/icons/Rodent/scalable/categories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016803
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #7)
> Currently xfce4-icon-theme doesn't contain scalable icons, only the 48x48
> ones.
Sorry for the blurb. Indeed, there are scalable icons in xfce4-icon-t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014848
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Bruno ---
Spec URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/python-mandrill/python-mandrill.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/python-mandrill/python-mandrill-1.0.51-1.fc19.src.rpm
1 - The LICENSE file isn't provi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726989
Jaroslav Imrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014848
--- Comment #3 from Yohan Graterol ---
1 - You can add the LICENSE from repo on bitbucket [0] as Source1.
2 - Not, but is good.
3 - Good!
4 - You must increment the release number and add the changes in the changelog.
[0]
https://bitbucket.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726989
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726989
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Ken Drey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-capillary-1.0.3-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-capillary-1.0.3-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-capillary-1.0.3-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-capillary-1.0.3-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017994
Bug ID: 1017994
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-climate_control - Modify your
ENV easily
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: med
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018004
Bug ID: 1018004
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-descendants_tracker - Module
that adds descendant tracking to a class
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016294
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018010
Bug ID: 1018010
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rails_autolink - Automatic
generation of HTML links in texts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017766
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen ---
Just a comment/thought on the naming: we have google-croscore-fonts already.
Would it make sense to name this google-crosextra-caladea-fonts?
Well I dunno the upstream tarball is not so precisely named...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821455
Cristian Ciupitu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(cristian.ciupitu@ |
|yahoo.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017767
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen ---
Alternative possible naming could be google-crosextra-carlito-fonts?
It is a little longer of course.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017767
--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen ---
cf https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=280557#c3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo