https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #35 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
= Review report for AudioCuesheetEditor-1.0.3-1 =
This review report has been made from manually downloaded spec / srpm as
announced in comment #28.
Package has
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877096
--- Comment #25 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to John Heidemann from comment #24)
Thank you for the suggestions in comment 23. I will update the spec again.
I thought I had picked up all prior comments, but maybe not.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018393
--- Comment #2 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
SRPM:
http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lv2-artyfx-plugins-0-1.1.20131011git918613f.fc20.src.rpm
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lv2-artyfx-plugins.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022827
Bug ID: 1022827
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-http-cookie - Ruby library to
handle HTTP Cookies based on RFC 6265
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022827
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017994
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015253
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mru...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759818
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022396
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DepGen-Perl-Tests-0.1.1-1.fc18.1 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DepGen-Perl-Tests-0.1.1-1.fc18.1
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #6 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
Thanks, I've filed https://github.com/openid/ruby-openid/issues/60 about the
license question. I'm also excluding the test directory as you suggest, so we
hopefully avoid the issue.
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021485
Matej Stuchlik mstuc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020014
Johan Swensson k...@kupo.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016677
--- Comment #5 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
Can you please comment on this?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Web_Assets#Fonts
Woff fonts are prohibited.
The rest looks pretty good.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020014
--- Comment #13 from Johan Swensson k...@kupo.se ---
Upstream says license is GPLv3 only.
Package is now renamed.
Spec URL: http://kupo.se/pub/review/python-pylcdsysinfo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
--- Comment #11 from Flavio Percoco fperc...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
https://gist.github.com/FlaPer87/7083329/raw/e1985cfc34512b6524527b25200a73cbfd1ffc51/jq.spec
SRPM Url:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
--- Comment #12 from Flavio Percoco fperc...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: jq
Short Description: Lightweight and flexible command-line JSON processor
Owners: flaper87
Branches: f20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020014
--- Comment #14 from Johan Swensson k...@kupo.se ---
(In reply to Johan Swensson from comment #12)
I will file a bugzilla about it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022851
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Bug ID: 1022908
Summary: Review Request: jline1 - Java library for reading and
editing user input in console applications
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1022909
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1022909 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1022909
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
--- Comment #13 from Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: jq
Short Description: Lightweight and flexible command-line JSON processor
Owners: flaper87
Branches: f19 f20 el6
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069
--- Comment #14 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Spotify is ready to amend their license statement with (private message):
Spotify confirms that the personal use restriction does not apply for the
open-source downloader. The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1022965
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1022969
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004231
Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1022971
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #13 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Björn besser82 Esser from comment #12)
(In reply to Nils Philippsen from comment #11)
Uhm why? I don't see a guideline prescribing that and so that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Severin Gehwolf sgehw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1022978
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020088
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020088
--- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017814
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rwhoisd-1.5.9.6-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rwhoisd-1.5.9.6-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017814
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rwhoisd-1.5.9.6-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rwhoisd-1.5.9.6-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022735
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022735
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020435
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069
--- Comment #16 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Updating links, new spotify upstream release:
spec:
http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/lpf-spotify-client/3/lpf-spotify-client.spec
srpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #7 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com ---
It seems like people prefer springframework-* naming [1], so let's keep the
name as it is.
[1]:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2013-October/004967.html
Looks like there
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
Flavio Percoco fperc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020435
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
URL is usable. Ok.
Source0 is valid. Ok.
Source tar ball is original (SHA-256:
efbc2dce1fffbf651d098500aedf53065cdb3cc308784f94135f77d93e24). Ok.
Summary is Ok.
Description verified from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020088
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020088
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
blosc-1.2.3-9.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/blosc-1.2.3-9.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020088
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
blosc-1.2.3-9.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/blosc-1.2.3-9.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069
--- Comment #17 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not contain
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069
--- Comment #18 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
Issues:
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023051
Bug ID: 1023051
Summary: Review Request: jboss-batch-1.0-api - Batch
Applciations 1.0 API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023051
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023051
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #7)
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #5)
It is nice to be able to use it without bundling in the sources:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069
--- Comment #19 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #18)
Issues:
[cut]
The license is MIT, but there's no license file installed. Please provide
one in %doc.
Done.
[!]: Package consistently
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021160
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
What about the summary solution? Ian, please don't think that we are waiting
futile change, changing to a clearer summary will help a lot for other users.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016677
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Brendan Jones from comment #5)
Can you please comment on this?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Web_Assets#Fonts
Woff fonts are prohibited.
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008476
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023051
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069
--- Comment #20 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #19)
On line 33, please use %{_datadir} instead of /usr/share.
On line 47 and 48 please use %{_sharedstatedir} instead of /var/lib.
I'd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020088
--- Comment #34 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Added to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring#B.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069
--- Comment #21 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
The version field is the upstream spotify version, I don't really see what
kind of comment that would be? Added the fact that this is indeed upstream
version.
Ok after the comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
in my system (f19) is not available hsqldb 2.x, and i not sure if with the
changes that you ask of me, there are no problems of compatibility.
for now leave hsqldb 1.x
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Unexpected. Which version of package rpm-build is that with?
The file /usr/lib/rpm/pkgconfigdeps.sh hasn't changed between F19 and F20, and:
$ rpm -qpR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022407
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003057
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003057
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018905
Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003057
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018905
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069
--- Comment #22 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #21)
I guess this is about spotify-client.spec? If so, there is no need for this
since the Source: url is OK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021721
--- Comment #14 from Erik Johnson e...@saltstack.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #13)
(snip)
So, one problem: bundled code. There are three things:
1. ext/console.py → this is some interface code, taken from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018905
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Left swells of InitialCC, not in FAS, can be added later.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022644
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022644
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022644
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Created attachment 815838
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=815838action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30
Command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022644
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022644
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Small notice, I don't think it make sense to have a %{github_version}.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908116
--- Comment #13 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/openshift-origin/openshift-origin-console.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021721
--- Comment #15 from Erik Johnson e...@saltstack.com ---
Also, this file appears to have been modified from the original version 0.8.2
from the source website. Here's a diff.
http://pastebin.com/igfV0RBf
So would the solution perhaps be to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022407
Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018393
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003057
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
irstlm-5.80.03-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/irstlm-5.80.03-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003057
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
