https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #31 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
ok
1. rpmlint: Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gnulib
How to solve ?
2. Note: Macros in: gnulib-docs (description)
Hm, this should be %{name}, not %{gnulib}. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #32 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
gnulib-tests is required for building modules, so added to Requires.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Michal Srb from comment #10)
The package looks good, just one non-blocker:
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
Latest stable version is 2.2.2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024043
Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024259
--- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6110999
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024259
Bug ID: 1024259
Summary: Review Request: python-chai - Easy to use mocking/stub
framework
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024259
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019603
Michal Minar mimi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mimi...@redhat.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885357
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004231
--- Comment #4 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com ---
One thing I didn't notice in my initial review is that the package name
lv2-sorcer differs from the tarball name openAV-sorcer which would be more in
line with the naming guidelines,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004231
--- Comment #5 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 817036
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=817036action=edit
0.0.1-0.2 build.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Preserving timestamps is somewhat controversial, and it is something where a
packager ought not to exxaggerate. It is not a MUST, but a SHOULD in some cases
only. Mostly: prebuilt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024043
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024043
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022908
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1022978 |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023429
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019603
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019603
Michal Minar mimi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mimi...@redhat.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024134
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #1)
Suggestions:
1) good if unnecessary information is removed from font wiki page
2) generally we create wiki pages with all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019603
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019603
Michal Minar mimi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019403
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
1. Fixed.
2. When I can get it to build.
3. Fixed.
4. Fixed.
5. Fixed.
6. Fixed.
7. Fixed.
8. Either works, but changed to your way.
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #17 from Branislav Blaškovič bblas...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Terje Røsten from comment #15)
Thanks for improvements, if you could post urls to your updated spec, srpm
and do a koji scratch build it would help a lot :-)
It
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #33 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
First Sample :
# Module Sample:
# %package %{module}
# Summary: %{summary_of_module}
# License: %{license_of_module}
#
# %build %{module}
# gnulib-build --create-testdir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #34 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
* gnulib-build = copy of gnulib-tool before edited :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-ruby-openid-2.3.0-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ruby-openid-2.3.0-3.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-ruby-openid-2.3.0-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ruby-openid-2.3.0-3.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001746
--- Comment #5 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
Mario, thank you very much for the review. I will drop the -doc dependency on
the main package when I import it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001746
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004231
--- Comment #6 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
With regards to the name, there's an unofficial standard for lv2 plugins. They
all are prefixed with lv2 . The install directory is sorcer.lv2, so I think
lv2-sorcer is more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008772
--- Comment #8 from Scott Talbert s...@techie.net ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7)
Package is fine, however I can find a udev rules in git, can you tell me if
we need it, too?
No, we don't need it. That is just a sample
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008772
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008772
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
New Notes:
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Please remove.
---
%post -n hidapi -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -n hidapi -p /sbin/ldconfig
---
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024127
--- Comment #6 from Suchakra sucha...@gmail.com ---
Aaah! Sorry. I must have been sleepy. I should have tested stuff before
updating and seen the error. Thanks for explaining me things in detail.
Please use
%package devel
I'll do that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #35 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Mosaab Alzoubi from comment #31)
ok
1. rpmlint: Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gnulib
How to solve ?
C'mon, just add
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024114
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024114
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907688
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|tinyxml2-1.0.11-4.20130805g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #36 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
Why not just 'git-merge-changelog'?
Because we working at (gnulib SRPM)
We can use ( Provides ) function.
Then there's the question if additional build requirements are needed.
All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: mindi |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985065
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #37 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Mosaab Alzoubi from comment #36)
Why not just 'git-merge-changelog'?
Because we working at (gnulib SRPM)
We can use ( Provides ) function.
The subpackage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985065
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023769
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023771
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985065
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759818
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Package for re-review should be based on the last build in the distribution:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/buffer/1.19/7.fc15/src/buffer-1.19-7.fc15.src.rpm
[
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317
--- Comment #43 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
The Spec URL and SRPM URL lines in review tickets make it possible to run
fedora-review -b 187317 for this ticket.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023769
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6114012
$ rpmlint -i -v *golang-github-goerlang-dist.src: I: checking
golang-github-goerlang-dist.src: I:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023671
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023671
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023671
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022584
--- Comment #8 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #7)
You didn't reply to the comments about python installation path.
I still see /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_cqmf2.so,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023671
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018568
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
some general quick questions:
- Why a prerelease? Is there some compelling thing in the prerelease thats
needed over the last stable?
- Prerelease versioning is a bit off. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020014
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020014
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-pylcdsysinfo-0-0.8.20131014git.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016767
Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #815004|0 |1
is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016767
Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024168
--- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- The comment # example/NeHe:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #38 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
Some problem (I can't solve)
Main package (gnulib) is noarch.
New sub package (git-merge-changelog) arched.
Now I can't build and have this message :
error: line 153: Only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Scott Talbert s...@techie.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008772
--- Comment #11 from Scott Talbert s...@techie.net ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #10)
New Notes:
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Please remove.
---
%post -n hidapi -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022584
--- Comment #9 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Darryl L. Pierce from comment #8)
Regarding polluting the global namespace, I'm not sure how that's occurring
with _cqmf2.so being in the root directory for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024114
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023848
Bug 1023848 depends on bug 1024114, which changed state.
Bug 1024114 Summary: Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation support
in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024114
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Thanks!
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: RemoteBox
Short Description: Open Source VirtualBox Client with Remote Management
Owners: cicku
Branches: f19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982255
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018541
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018546
Bug 1018546 depends on bug 1018541, which changed state.
Bug 1018541 Summary: Review Request: libreplaygain - Gain analysis library from
Musepack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018541
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016200
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982255
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|labyrinth-0.6-3.fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996311
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996311
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CAD-Format-STL-0.2.1-5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975315
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975315
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libodb-mysql-2.2.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-mysql-2.2.0-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975315
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libodb-mysql-2.2.0-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-mysql-2.2.0-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023848
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
So, I've now used this to build zlib.js, and it seems to work, yay!
Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/closure-compiler.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-qt-2.2.1-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975317
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
