https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026342
Michal Srb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317
Murray McAllister changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmcal...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027506
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Bruno ---
Follow the new spec and src rpm with the recommended adjustments.
Spec URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/python-proboscis/python-proboscis.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/python-proboscis/p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024127
--- Comment #13 from Suchakra ---
Hi,
> Do you understand what the changelog is supposed to contain? Compare to
> other packages with 'rpm -q --changelog '.
Thanks for clarifying. I have changed this appropriately.
> - You need to filter t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003057
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001746
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016170
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011718
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022827
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #13 from Orion Poplawski ---
Source url in spec still seems wrong:
spectool -g *spec
Getting
https://github.com/paultcochrane/pbsclusterviz/archive/pbsclusterviz-0.7a-4.fc19.tar.gz
to ./pbsclusterviz-0.7a-4.fc19.tar.gz
% Total
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski ---
Please publish URLs to the raw files and to src.rpm files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025102
--- Comment #12 from Rino Rondan ---
Hi Christopher, Do you have time for do a review again, please let me know.
Best Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024885
--- Comment #12 from Matthias Runge ---
Does the client work without pbr installed at runtime?
I thought, pbr is just for building the release, right?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021091
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
dnsyo-1.1.4-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnsyo-1.1.4-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021091
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
dnsyo-1.1.4-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnsyo-1.1.4-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026139
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Rex Diet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028175
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022827
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
Thank you for trying to take this package anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022827
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|bjoern.es...@gma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022827
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
|needinfo?(bjoern.es
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206
William Brown changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206
Bug ID: 1028206
Summary: Review Request: tayga - nat64 implementation for linux
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
prboom-plus-2.5.1.3-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/prboom-plus-2.5.1.3-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
prboom-plus-2.5.1.3-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/prboom-plus-2.5.1.3-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #16 from Jaromír Cápík ---
Fixed in prboom-plus-2.5.1.3-3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028175
--- Comment #1 from Ken Dreyer ---
F21 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6152507
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this produc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028175
Bug ID: 1028175
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-force_utf8 - Convert any Ruby
string to UTF8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #15 from Jaromír Cápík ---
Hello Gil.
The 'mktemp' call is known for race conditions and therefore is forbidden for
secure applications, but that isn't our case. To make you feel a bit
comfortable, I'll replace the 'mktemp' call w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028168
Bug ID: 1028168
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-expression_parser - A math
parser
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028164
Bug ID: 1028164
Summary: Review Request: globus-xio-gridftp-driver - Globus
Toolkit - Globus XIO GridFTP Driver
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028165
Bug ID: 1028165
Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-slurm - Globus
Toolkit - SLURM Job Manager Support
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo ---
have again this problem to solve(?):
prboom-plus.i686: E: call-to-mktemp /usr/bin/prboom-plus
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016258
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027506
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978569
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020309
Martin Bříza changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mbr...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770
Alec Leamas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leamas.a...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
prboom-plus-2.5.1.3-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/prboom-plus-2.5.1.3-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
prboom-plus-2.5.1.3-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/prboom-plus-2.5.1.3-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #10 from Jaromír Cápík ---
Thanks guys. Building right now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024885
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Ruzicka ---
Indeed, I didn't update the patches here, but I removed 0002 as well to get the
above behavior. However, no degree of pbr nuking (including none) led me to
working %check.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903246
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
python-cpopen-1.2.3-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cpopen-1.2.3-4.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903246
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System ---
python-cpopen-1.2.3-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cpopen-1.2.3-4.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
Jaromír Cápík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Jarom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815001
--- Comment #15 from Shawn Starr ---
Just so everyone is aware and in the loop:
We're working off of this .spec file:
https://nazar.karan.org/blob/misc!opennebula/544a11f6ff0d83f6e4eec57479c6b15d72ccc5bb/SPECS!opennebula.spec
I have several
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #7 from Jaromír Cápík ---
Fixed release:
Spec URL: http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/prboom-plus/2/prboom-plus.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jcapik.fedorapeople.org/files/prboom-plus/2/prboom-plus-2.5.1.3-2.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #6 from Jaromír Cápík ---
The re-licensing clarification can be found in the AUTHORS file. The code was
released by the Id Software under the GPL license in 1999. Raven Software
cooperated with Id Software on the engine and the lat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #5 from Jaromír Cápík ---
The SIMD extension is compiled into binary code on WIN32 platform only.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026743
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
URL is usable. Ok.
Sourece0 is usable. Ok.
Source tar ball is original (SHA-256:
52f3e476099a2a82c920339e739f2626db9d0fa6b8a7289fa231be4a4af77f48). Ok.
Summary verified from README. Ok.
TODO: Use valid URL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
--- Comment #4 from Jaromír Cápík ---
Hello Gil.
Thank you. These double-licensed files are always a bit problematic. The BSD
licensed stuff was supposed to be relicensed under the GPLv2, but apparently
one file was forgotten. And the LGPL li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
--- Comment #11 from Remi Collet ---
Result is much better :) as test suite is useful
FYI:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-password-compat-1.0.0-5.git58151cf.el6
Just a small problem: sources should not be conditionalized.
You c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
--- Comment #2 from David King ---
I submitted a scratch build to koji, which built successfully:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6149528
I am the upstream maintainer of gnome-logs.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770
--- Comment #2 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> I don't think that you need a sponsor, right?
Indeed sorry. I meant I need someone to review it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026743
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
--- Comment #1 from David King ---
I am not yet in the package collection maintainers group, although I have
submitted another package in bug 985446 and a largish update to an existing
package in bug 951265.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #11 from Paul Cochrane ---
Hi Orion,
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #9)
> Also doesn't build:
>
> RPM build errors:
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pbsclusterviz-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
Bug ID: 1027784
Summary: Review Request: gnome-logs - a log viewer for the
systemd journal
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
--- Comment #10 from Paul Cochrane ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #8)
> First issue: error: %changelog not in descending chronological order
Corrected in commit 0567dd6d62c90738530c00322c6c692a6f7afe8f of
https://github.com/paul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng ---
I don't think that you need a sponsor, right?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/nmav
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
Block
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770
Bug ID: 1027770
Summary: Review Request: ocserv - OpenConnect SSL VPN server
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027594
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027594
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||989982
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
72 matches
Mail list logo
