https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030751
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Pete Travis from comment #1)
> Something's gone wrong with the SRPM! try another upload?
You can try again at the same URLs now.
My internet connection is fuzzy now...(saw your email for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030751
Pete Travis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
--- Comment #12 from Remi Collet ---
Another minor issue using the same .src.rpm for symfony2 and icu.
On symfony2 update, you will have to manage NVER of icu (you cannot use the
same).
So, for example:
php-symfony2-2.3.6-2 => php-symfon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002092
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
NEW SPEC URL: http://cicku.me/burp.spec
NEW SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/burp-1.4.6-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
--- Comment #19 from Pete Travis ---
Cool, thanks for working on the deps!
Found the problem - no %files for python3-nikola-extras. Go ahead and give
fedora-review another go.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
--- Comment #18 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Pete Travis from comment #17)
> 1. I can do, no problem - but please don't block my review on *optional*
> features. Really, this software has more than a handful of niche features,
> and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1028816
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||971737
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
--- Comment #17 from Pete Travis ---
I'm using rawhide for mock, but my local system is F20 and I think that's what
fedora-review used. After taking a closer look, the review.txt's I diffed were
empty. Do'h! Explicitly asking fedora-review to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030755
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1010741
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1030755
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030755
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1030754
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030755
Bug ID: 1030755
Summary: Review Request: python-livereload - LiveReload server
in Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
--- Comment #16 from Christopher Meng ---
mock clean 3 times so far and still failed with:
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/deps.py", line 183, in
listpaths
path, mode = line.rsplit(None, 10)[0:5:4]
ValueError: need m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030751
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1010741
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1030751
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030751
Bug ID: 1030751
Summary: Review Request: python-bbcode - A pure python bbcode
parser and formatter
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005931
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
your suggestion isn't a best solution, because, at least half of the java
packages fail (test suite) on ARM builder. and these packets are all noarch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030734
Bug ID: 1030734
Summary: Review Request: pgpdump - PGP packet visualizer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023605
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen ---
Koji rawhide scratch:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6182249
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812561
--- Comment #14 from Christopher Meng ---
For the first question I made, I need to explain a bit more clearly:
Do we need to care about fedora < 12?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812561
--- Comment #13 from Christopher Meng ---
Hmm..
1. Do we still need conditional with_python3 line? I'm not sure.
2. python-ipdb.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.8-1 ['0.8-2.fc21',
'0.8-2']
3.
Requires
python-ipdb (rpml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011696
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996462
--- Comment #16 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to David Dight from comment #15)
> Ok understand now.
> - I think the schemas would be ok under copylib - in fact the author of
> quickfix states in their documentation that users are free to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996462
--- Comment #15 from David Dight ---
Ok understand now.
- I think the schemas would be ok under copylib - in fact the author of
quickfix states in their documentation that users are free to copy and use them
as they wish.
-gzstream, modp_itoa a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
--- Comment #15 from Pete Travis ---
I can't replicate this here. First attempt at `fedora-review -b 1010741` *did*
give a short traceback; then mock reinitialized the buildroot and continued
operation. `fedora-review -n python-nikola` on loc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030710
Bug ID: 1030710
Summary: Review Request: python-pgpdump - PGP packet parser
library in Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812561
--- Comment #12 from Brian C. Lane ---
Thanks, updated with those changes. I think your build was a temporary failure,
it works fine for me using mock --rebuild
Spec URL: http://bcl.fedorapeople.org/python-ipdb/python-ipdb.spec
SRPM URL:
http:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023605
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||Ready
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023605
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009842
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen ---
The devel package obsoletes the old highlighting-kate binary package,
which I think is good enough considering that the Highlight program
in the old highlighting-kate binary is little used.
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
Bug 1011705 depends on bug 1011696, which changed state.
Bug 1011696 Summary: Review Request: jdo-api
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011696
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011696
Pete MacKinnon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962
Bug 1011962 depends on bug 1011696, which changed state.
Bug 1011696 Summary: Review Request: jdo-api
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011696
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009153
Pete MacKinnon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025052
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
javasysmon-0.3.4-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/javasysmon-0.3.4-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025052
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
javasysmon-0.3.4-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/javasysmon-0.3.4-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025052
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025047
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016294
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016809
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018568
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018568
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972943
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
lpf-0-9.b40e846.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lpf-0-9.b40e846.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018568
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Anto
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025052
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025052
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018568
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714
--- Comment #21 from Alec Leamas ---
The FPC have discussed the issue. The ticket (#362) is still missing a +1 vote,
but I think it a safe bet to say it will be approved. This means that lpf-skype
should go to rpmfusion.
In the best of all wo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025052
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #12 from Jerry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025052
--- Comment #11 from Jerry James ---
Thank you, Mosaab. I appreciate the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770
--- Comment #34 from Alec Leamas ---
The FPC didn't make a decision on it this week, they ran out of time. It should
be on top of the agenda next week, though. Also, I chatted a little with them
after the meeting and the ticket is seemingly OK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #54 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863793
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|CURRENTR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863796
Bug 863796 depends on bug 863793, which changed state.
Bug 863793 Summary: Review Request: skeinforge - Converts 3D model into G-Code
for RepRap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863793
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028780
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001028
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028741
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023603
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019453
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #50 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025052
Mosaab Alzoubi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018568
--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande ---
Hi Mario.
The packages should be okay now. This new release requests at least version
5.0.12 of 'tubo'; 'tubo' will be pushed for testing soon but it's already built
in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030073
David Shea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028780
--- Comment #11 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to Dave M from comment #8)
> Two final questions please:
>
> 1. Minor problem: I did not have the %{dist} for the devel branch build. Is
> there anything I should do to clean this up?
>
So
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030073
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030073
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953514
--- Comment #13 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
Hi Ingvar,
It's been quite a while, and I'd like to resume this review because lately I've
had to install a couple modules (the ones I'd like to package).
Now that I understand the process better, I'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019453
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019453
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
sddm-kcm-0-0.1.20131114gitafdda33c.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sddm-kcm-0-0.1.20131114gitafdda33c.fc20
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030073
David Shea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from David Sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030073
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029750
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Faux ---
I cannot build the package on koji yet, since jemmy-2.3.1.1 is not yet in any
official repo, therefor I tested it on copr:
http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/coprs/faux/netbeans-platform/builds/
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996462
--- Comment #14 from Orion Poplawski ---
I understand that it makes it easier for your project, but Fedora as a
distribution has the following policy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries
Also, FastFlow seems to grab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024885
Jakub Ruzicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mru...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030073
--- Comment #2 from David Shea ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> 1. Better use macro consistently as:
>
> Summary:Development files for %{name}
> Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
>
> %descrip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008787
Ricky Elrod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Rick
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030073
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812561
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029578
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029578
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019453
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019453
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226140
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Created attachment 823930
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=823930&action=edit
spec cleanup as per current packaging guidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000949
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000949
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028780
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
thunar-sendto-clamtk-0.04-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thunar-sendto-clamtk-0.04-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028780
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028780
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
thunar-sendto-clamtk-0.04-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thunar-sendto-clamtk-0.04-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023603
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-data-default-class-0.0.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-data-default-class-0.0.1-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023603
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023603
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-data-default-class-0.0.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-data-default-class-0.0.1-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008787
Ricky Elrod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rel...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019453
Martin Bříza changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Martin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024885
Jakub Ruzicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mru...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025052
Mosaab Alzoubi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525412
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030307
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030307
Bug ID: 1030307
Summary: Review Request: yate - Yet Another Telephony Engine
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969718
Bug 969718 depends on bug 101, which changed state.
Bug 101 Summary: Review Request: devscripts - Scripts for Debian Package
maintainers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=101
What|Removed
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
