https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812561
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031019
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967337
Achilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(anujmorex@gmail.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317
--- Comment #31 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
Note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529861
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031337
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
For the legal issue, I really don't have idea, as Debian has said it's
nonfree.
It's highly likely that they reject the licensing, which is LGPL with
sublicensing terms. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916039
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994474
--- Comment #20 from Marcel Haerry mh+fed...@scrit.ch ---
Sorry, it took me a while to come back to this work.
But I integrated all the patches. Added python3 support and have done a
test-build against F21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030755
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997679
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hdego...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967337
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967337
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-faraday-0.8.8-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-faraday-0.8.8-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030968
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954108
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031342
--- Comment #5 from Rob Clark rcl...@redhat.com ---
ok.. removed that, and the BuildRequires: git.. the .spec is still in same
place:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~robclark/rpmbuild/xorg-x11-drv-freedreno/xorg-x11-drv-freedreno.spec
(and I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001407
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
So any substantive conclusion so far?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001407
--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
/usr/share/bash-completion/completions has 666 completion files on my own
system so I consider it as the better place for such things. Regarding the
ownership situation,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317
--- Comment #32 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info
---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #31)
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858084
--- Comment #14 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025292
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967337
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-faraday-0.8.8-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-faraday-0.8.8-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031250
--- Comment #10 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Ivan Romanov from comment #9)
Hm ... I try to use wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autodetection
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charset
In the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967337
Achilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1031318 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031318
Achilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|967337 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031250
--- Comment #11 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru ---
Yeah.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031400
Bug ID: 1031400
Summary: Review Request: php-symfony2-icu - Symfony2 Icu
Component
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989847
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016753
--- Comment #10 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/nodejs/nodejs-bson.spec
SRPM URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-bson-0.2.3-2.fc20.src.rpm
- Updated source to match upstream
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031342
--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
(In reply to Rob Clark from comment #5)
(and I bumped the release #.. although wasn't 100% sure if that is
appropriate for a pre-release rpm.. it was at least convenient for me
testing it)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031400
--- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Ooops, wrong spec URL...
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/siwinski/rpms/539215a11b94d9dbcbf8e15e281c8c6e8a3b215f/php-symfony2-icu.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989850
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027407
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1031400
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031400
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1021749
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027187
--- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Building packages for f19 and f20 failed. Found this in root.log:
DEBUG util.py:266: Error: No Package found for rubygem(backports) 4
DEBUG util.py:266: Error: No
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997679
--- Comment #33 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
The compat-SFML16 package should not have been named a compat- package.
Historically and typically, compat packages are runtime-only compatibility
packages for 3rd party software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998141
--- Comment #16 from Mario Ceresa mrcer...@gmail.com ---
Here it goes the formal review. In summary:
* Please create a sub package for the documentation
* Please unbundle the gtest framework included in test/
Package Review
==
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027187
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Just seen there are no branches for f19 and f20 in the package database. Hm, if
it makes sense you'll need to request those branches.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030154
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028481
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030734
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002092
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031337
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031437
Bug ID: 1031437
Summary: Review Request: truecommons - Common components for
open source projects
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031437
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994474
--- Comment #21 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Requires
python3-qrencode (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
libpython3.3m.so.1.0()(64bit)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317
--- Comment #33 from Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) from comment #29)
Ok, patch applied:
https://github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/commit/
254026856dbec79ad716b58729e09f5b0363c922
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994474
--- Comment #22 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Oh, it should be enough to move the Requires: python3-pillow to the proper
place.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021733
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031337
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #3)
Isn't this a window manager?
Sorry, it was a mistake.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031437
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812561
Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031437
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
main package must be like:
%files -f .mfiles-%{name}
%dir %{_javadir}/%{name}
%doc epl-v10.html
please, fix unowned directory
.mfiles should be empty, use .mfiles-%{name} instead if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031437
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922060
Travis Paul t...@vispaul.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901365
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967337
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995283
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995283
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-flask-restless-0.12.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031337
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
BTW I posted an email to devel for asking help of choosing location of desktop
file for window managers, I think currently the status is very chaotic:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031466
Bug ID: 1031466
Summary: Review Request: jamm - Java Agent for Memory
Measurements
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725292
Cott Lang c...@internetstaff.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@internetstaff.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023605
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|Ready |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006114
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|Ready |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006114
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023605
Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851810
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978723
Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rel...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978723
Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317
--- Comment #34 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) from comment #32)
%{_sysconfdir}/%{name} mentioned as %dir now and files listed separately.
Meantime i have not seen such error in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031400
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031400
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Created attachment 825412
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=825412action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30
Command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031400
--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
[!] Package installs properly.
Wait for dependency before import
[~]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
could be php-symfony-icu, but 2 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008787
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978723
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|Ready |
--
You are
76 matches
Mail list logo