https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015765
--- Comment #12 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
It's fixed after first packaging :)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688972
I'll update this package due to updating upstream.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015765
--- Comment #13 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
This example of wine.spec:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/wine.git/tree/wine.spec
Using only one line:
%config %{_sysconfdir}/xdg/menus/applications-merged/wine.menu
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025196
Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026376
--- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Tom spot Callaway from comment #6)
I think given that A) the logos in this font are the ones with specific
permissions granted by their owners and B) it is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032479
Bug ID: 1032479
Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Report - Report a problem
with exceptions and translation support
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032479
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1032489
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032479
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1032489
Depends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021733
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Björn besser82 Esser from comment #14)
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #13)
The test suite expects a running X server and a valid display number. As far
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005490
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Please:
1. Add these supports by BR:
i. libmodplug-devel
ii. fluidsynth-devel
iii.libmikmod-devel
2. Remove
Requires: pkgconfig
in -devel package.
3. License is not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023474
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
A month passed, I still can't see any changes in SCM.
PING.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032515
Bug ID: 1032515
Summary: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-adadomain – Ada
domain for the Sphinx documentation generator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032515
Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032515
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032515
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032515
--- Comment #2 from Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se ---
Wow, that was a fast review!
Only issue: %{python_sitelib} -- %{python2_sitelib}
Oh? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python doesn't mention
python2_sitelib anywhere,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032108
--- Comment #5 from james jamescateg...@gmail.com ---
@Terje Røsten: I've applied all the changes you suggested except one. I had
already tried %cmake and it didn't work for me. In fact using %cmake would lead
to many errors during make. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032515
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Simple package, why not fast...
Swap with bug 1001452.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #14 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #13)
(In reply to Jose Pedro Oliveira from comment #7)
please add the test/default/*.c files
(they can also serve as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #15 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt ---
Specfile changes based on the previous comment:
--- libsodium.spec.chris2013-11-20 03:50:41.0 +
+++ libsodium.spec2013-11-20 12:13:15.240043289 +
@@ -23,9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001452
Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032515
Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001452
Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #16 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Jose Pedro Oliveira from comment #14)
%doc test/default/*.{c,h}
Fine.
* Do we need to increase the verbosity level of make (V=1)?
Yes, it's a MUST.
* Don't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028481
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Ok.
Try again from URLs in the original comment.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025196
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025196
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032515
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032515
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018498
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wondershaper-1.2.1-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wondershaper-1.2.1-2.el6
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018498
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018498
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wondershaper-1.2.1-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wondershaper-1.2.1-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018498
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wondershaper-1.2.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wondershaper-1.2.1-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018498
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wondershaper-1.2.1-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wondershaper-1.2.1-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
hi
is available new release datanucleus-core 3.2.9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024885
Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
build fails, cause:
Failed to resolve artifact: javax.cache:cache-api:pom:0.9
please, remove cache-api references
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5488/6205488/build.log
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
--- Comment #8 from Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com ---
cache-api is disabled in the latest (.3). Are you reviewing an older version?
Anyway I will be updating to 3.2.9 (if possible) per comment #6.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
* Do we need to increase the verbosity level of make (V=1)?
Yes, it's a MUST.
Really? Please link the packaging/review guidelines more often than not.
Verbose build output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
--- Comment #9 from Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com ---
Hmmm, maybe certain versions of xmvn are ignoring the optionaltrue/optional
attribute. I will explicitly remove the dep in next update.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032203
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024885
Jakub Ruzicka jruzi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Pete MacKinnon from comment #8)
cache-api is disabled in the latest (.3). Are you reviewing an older version?
Anyway I will be updating to 3.2.9 (if possible) per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032203
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032670
Bug ID: 1032670
Summary: Review Request: docker-registry - Registry server for
Docker
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858070
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||858084
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858084
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||858070
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031342
--- Comment #16 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org ---
@christopher, pkgconfig(libdrm_freedreno) is only available on ARM, so if you
don't have an ARM machine to run fedora-review, you'll have to manually run the
sanity checks using
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027513
--- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
The package now builds on F19.
Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-axiom-types.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031342
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
--- Comment #11 from Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com ---
Updated to 3.2.9, cache-api fully removed, tests disabled:
SPEC URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/datanucleus/datanucleus-core.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024885
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024885
--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010383
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
time-api-0.6.4-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/time-api-0.6.4-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010383
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010383
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
time-api-0.6.4-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/time-api-0.6.4-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947640
--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/snappy/snappy-player.spec
SRPM URL:
http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/snappy/snappy-player-0.3.7-1.20131119git8ece98e0.fc19.src.rpm
Koji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
build fails
[INFO] --- xmvn-mojo:1.3.0:install (default-cli) @ datanucleus-core ---
[WARNING] Failed to resolve artifact: org.apache.ivy:ivy:pom:2.3.0
[WARNING] The POM for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031337
--- Comment #6 from Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #2)
For the legal issue, I really don't have idea, as Debian has said it's
nonfree.
It's highly likely that they reject the licensing,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863795
--- Comment #14 from Dawid Gajownik gajow...@gmail.com ---
Please add below line
Requires: qca-ossl%{?_isa}
otherwise encryption plugin will not load.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018498
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903246
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
Bug ID: 1032750
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-syndtr-gocapability -
POSIX Capability library for the Go programming
lanaguage
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
Vincent Batts vba...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@redhat.com
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031437
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017202
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028481
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016767
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026342
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011183
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031437
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031337
--- Comment #7 from Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
This package in Debian is in nonfree repo, have you noticed this fact? I
just blocked FE-Legal in order to get some information from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947640
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947640
--- Comment #11 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
There is a malfunctioning in snappy, it's documented by this warnings:
(snappy:27349): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified class size for type
`ClutterGstVideoSink' is smaller than
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998141
Mario Ceresa mrcer...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947640
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||GNOME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005490
--- Comment #6 from Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com ---
new SPEC: http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/SDL2_mixer.spec
new SRPM:
http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/SDL2_mixer-2.0.0-3.fc20.src.rpm
* Wed Nov
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925
Cleber Rodrigues cr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cr...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925
Cleber Rodrigues cr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925
Cleber Rodrigues cr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla@l |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #19 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
What I meant is it is not in the guidelines [yet]. Some reviewers ask for
verbose build output (me included), but not because it's a MUST in the
guidelines.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
--- Comment #1 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
1. The %{import_path} could be placed in Source0 as well if you wanna make it
shorter, but no biggie.
2. rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT lines should be removed (is it otherwise causing an
error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925
Robert Scheck red...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Batts vba...@redhat.com ---
1. fair
2. rpmlint noted it. i figured no harm. So i've left it to only the %clean
section.
3. added
4. debug leftover. removed.
spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026380
Heiko Adams bugzi...@heiko-adams.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998141
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
--- Comment #4 from Vincent Batts vba...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-syndtr-gocapability
Short Description: POSIX Capability library for the Go programming lanaguage
Owners: vbatts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
Vincent Batts vba...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
--- Comment #5 from Vincent Batts vba...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-syndtr-gocapability
Short Description: POSIX Capability library for the Go programming lanaguage
Owners: vbatts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Batts vba...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-syndtr-gocapability
Short Description: POSIX Capability library for the Go programming language
Owners: vbatts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
--- Comment #6 from Vincent Batts vba...@redhat.com ---
spelling corrections in description
spec:
http://vbatts.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/golang-github-syndtr-gocapability.spec
srpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
Vincent Batts vba...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
Vincent Batts vba...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031531
Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953514
--- Comment #14 from Ingvar Hagelund ing...@linpro.no ---
As this is not supported by upstream for varnish 3, and I have to find extra
time to work on varnish packaging, I would prefer to wait for varnish 4.
Ingvar
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000870
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nini-1.1.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nini-1.1.0-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
