https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
--- Comment #29 from Pete Travis ---
The "doc" package stemmed from my misinterpreting your suggestion in Comment 5.
I've changed the spec to use full package names, for consistency.
The spell check complaints can be ignored. Nikola and ReStr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005522
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-27.fc20,ghc-mtl-2.1.2-27.fc20,ghc-zlib-0.5.4.1-27.fc20
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005522
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-27.fc20,ghc-mtl-2.1.2-27.fc20,ghc-zlib-0.5.4.1-27.fc20
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
--- Comment #35 from Remi Collet ---
@Michael, for thi package, the new "must" be puhsed before retiring the old.
Symfony is a dep of PHPUnit which is used by a lot of PHP packages,
having a broken deps will forbid any new build...
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846206
--- Comment #7 from anish ---
Sorry for a long delay
Updated Package review is as follows:-
Spec URL: http://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/gnome-transliteration.spec
SRPM URL:
http://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/gnome-transliteration-0.0.3-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025196
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025196
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
fcitx-skk-0.1.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fcitx-skk-0.1.0-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
--- Comment #28 from Christopher Meng ---
Sorry, after mock root cleaning up, review process could run well.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005796
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
langdetect-1.1-0.2.20120112.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/langdetect-1.1-0.2.20120112.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005796
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005904
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
restlet-jse-2.1.4-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/restlet-jse-2.1.4-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005904
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||ghc-parsec
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen ---
*** Bug 1038352 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038352
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023605
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036254
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005800
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035934
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033967
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038352
Bug ID: 1038352
Summary: Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser
combinators
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037443
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037427
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033967
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
ShellCheck-0.2.0-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ShellCheck-0.2.0-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033967
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033967
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
ShellCheck-0.2.0-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ShellCheck-0.2.0-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-cmdln-1.3.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cmdln-1.3.0-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-cmdln-1.3.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cmdln-1.3.0-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035499
Simo Sorce changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034387
Simo Sorce changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005904
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005904
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
--- Comment #34 from Michael Schwendt ---
Please don't push the package prior to retiring the obsolete packages:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
If that is not done properly, typically someone submits an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005904
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from gil ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005904
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089
--- Comment #20 from Luis Pabon ---
Any update?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038274
Bug ID: 1038274
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-liquid - A secure, non-evaling
end user template engine with aesthetic markup
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005800
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005800
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
jsonic-1.3.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jsonic-1.3.0-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016441
James Wrigley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jwrigley7@gmail.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035934
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
mod_form-0.1-1.20131204svn145.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_form-0.1-1.20131204svn145.el6
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035934
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
mod_form-0.1-1.20131204svn145.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_form-0.1-1.20131204svn145.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035934
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
Andrea Veri changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Andrea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Veri ---
Thanks, as a note, final SRPM and spec file:
SPEC: http://averi.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/python-cmdln/python-cmdln.spec
SRPM:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6796/6256796/python-cmdln-1.3.0-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038238
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038238
Bug ID: 1038238
Summary: Review Request: kde-touchpad-config - KDE
Systemsettings module for touchpads
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
--- Comment #27 from Pete Travis ---
I can't replicate that. If you look at the spec, you see that I'm manually
installing nikola2(1) with the python2 package and nikola3(1) with the python3
package. There is no /usr/share/man/man1/nikola.1.g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032200
Robert Rati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035934
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035934
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032108
--- Comment #61 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
- Please use URL as Source
- Please put the docs/ dir in a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032108
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Veri ---
Updated scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6256364
SPEC at the same url.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038167
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||libatomic_ops
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
Alias|lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
--- Comment #1 from Andrea Veri ---
Full scratch build available at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6256270
Spec available at:
http://averi.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/python-cmdln/python-cmdln.spec
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036130
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
Bug ID: 1038190
Summary: Review Request: python-cmdln - An improved cmd.py for
Writing Multi-command Scripts and Shells
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038190
Andrea Veri changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|puiterw...@redhat.com
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035934
Andrea Veri changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Andrea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035934
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035934
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Please make -devel depend on the base package:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032108
James Abtahi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038167
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6256188
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032108
--- Comment #60 from James Abtahi ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: yarock
Short Description: A lightweight, beautiful music player
Owners: jam3s
Branches: f19 f20
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038167
--- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter ---
With new gc-7.4.0 release, upstream has split libatomic_ops into a separate
package/tarball (as was done in fedora < 13 ). This review will bring back the
old/retired libatomic_ops package module.
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038167
Bug ID: 1038167
Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update
operations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035934
--- Comment #4 from Andrea Veri ---
There we go:
new spec: http://averi.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/mod_form/mod_form.spec
new SRPM:
http://averi.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/mod_form/mod_form-0.1-1.20131204svn145.el6.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014738
--- Comment #23 from Christian Dersch ---
Hi,
I performed another (right now informal) review, looks fine imho :) As I'm new
to reviewing
packages, I'm unsure about some points (marked with [?] => not evaluated).
Greetings,
Christian
Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035935
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037656
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037656
--- Comment #4 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
(In reply to Stanislav Ochotnicky from comment #1)
> I am
> not entirely sure about the naming, but sadly...I am not sure how I feel
> about "org.ow2-ow2-pom". I'll leave it up to you.
I think that the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035934
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Sorry ,version numbering must be according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035934
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Version numbering must be sane
Note: if you get
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037656
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037656
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020467
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020467
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033967
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033967
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005800
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005800
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005796
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005796
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038128
David Tardon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtar...@redhat.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038128
Bug ID: 1038128
Summary: Review Request: libeot - a library for parsing
Embedded OpenType font files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032108
--- Comment #59 from James Abtahi ---
> Please add:
> %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
> which is otherwise unowned. Other than that, it looks fine.
Done. I'm going to put a request for creation of a repository in the next few
hours. In the meantime
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884497
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032108
--- Comment #58 from Kevin Kofler ---
Please add:
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
which is otherwise unowned. Other than that, it looks fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
