https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044894
Bug ID: 1044894
Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-X509 - Parse a X.509
certificate
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044894
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||665096
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041924
--- Comment #11 from Matthias Runge ---
Andy, then you'd need to upload a new srpm/spec.
I just found a line: requires: python in the spec, which does not fit to the
claim of using python3. I consider this at least as unfortunate, since we
re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044910
Bug ID: 1044910
Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-GUID - Globally unique
identifiers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044910
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||665096
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044929
Bug ID: 1044929
Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-Extract - Date::Extract Perl
module
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044929
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||665096
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044935
Bug ID: 1044935
Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Address-List - RFC close
address list parsing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044935
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||665096
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033433
Sergio Pascual changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970896
--- Comment #20 from Danishka Navin ---
Hi Christopher,
Let me know if there is any else I should fix.
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033433
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970896
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970896
Danishka Navin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #22 from Dani
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jdor...@redhat.com
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034943
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008242
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ib54003@fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ravn...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043157
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amigad...@amigadave.com
Assignee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924682
Palle Ravn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ravn...@gmail.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043157
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Whiteboard|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970896
--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
No new f18 branches are being created.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970896
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991624
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991624
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033433
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038817
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033433
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038817
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045034
Bug ID: 1045034
Summary: Review Request: openstack-neutron - check whether db
needs to be upgraded
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714
--- Comment #25 from Alec Leamas ---
While the resolution closed/wontfix certainly is OK, the process is not. This
was assigned to Simone (negativo17...), and IMHO the proper action would have
been to put a comment in the bug that it should be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988997
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991624
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991624
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
gmetric4j-1.0.3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmetric4j-1.0.3-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988997
--- Comment #26 from luke-jr+redhatb...@utopios.org ---
Is there any way to get this updated to a supported branch? 3.2.x and 3.5.x are
currently receiving backports, but 3.3.0 is very dead by now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043157
--- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti ---
Thanks a lot for the review.
hadess released the next version relicensed to GPLv2+
Spec URL:
http://declera.com/~yaneti/gnome-kra-ora-thumbnailer/gnome-kra-ora-thumbnailer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://declera.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991624
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
gmetric4j-1.0.3-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmetric4j-1.0.3-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032750
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883104
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029068
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045141
Bug ID: 1045141
Summary: Review Request: python-jsonpath-rw - extended
implementation of JSONPath for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045141
--- Comment #1 from Steve Linabery ---
builds:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6316938
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041924
--- Comment #12 from Andy Lutomirski ---
Are you looking at the right spec?
Spec URL: http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/fish_rpm_v5/fish.spech
SRPM URL:
http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/fish_rpm_v5/fish-2.1.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
Koji scratch bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045141
--- Comment #2 from Steve Linabery ---
Please hold on this package review. Upstream just informed me that a new
release is available which addresses
https://github.com/kennknowles/python-jsonpath-rw/issues/11
I will prepare a new SRPM immedia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045149
Bug ID: 1045149
Summary: Review Request: kcm-systemd - Systemd control module
for KDE
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045149
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||kcm-systemd
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043305
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
epix-1.2.13-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/epix-1.2.13-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043305
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
epix-1.2.13-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/epix-1.2.13-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043305
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041924
--- Comment #13 from Andy Lutomirski ---
To avoid further confusion: rpm is smart enough to pick up the dependency on
/usr/bin/python3 from the patched #! lines in the python scripts.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045141
--- Comment #3 from Steve Linabery ---
SpecURL (updated): http://slinabery.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonpath-rw.spec
SRPM URL:
http://slinabery.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-1.fc18.src.rpm
koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861502
--- Comment #7 from Will Benton ---
Gil, please use smp_mflags to build the docs. Otherwise, things look good!
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #56 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
Thanx Alot Zbigniew, I know how much time you spent for building package and
doing this review, Thank You.
0-4.20131219git
- Update.
- General tweaks.
- Remove META main package.
- Rename -core into -de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043157
Yanko Kaneti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|AwaitingSubmitter |
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861502
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks!
Please, set the *flags* ... Status
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/metrics.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/metrics-3.0.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
- use smp_mflags to build the docs
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861502
Will Benton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861502
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from gil ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951582
--- Comment #9 from Susi Lehtola ---
Added BR and R on numpy.
http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/psi4.spec
http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/psi4-4.0-0.5.b5.fc19.src.rpm
Successful koji build
http://koji.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #7 from Will Benton ---
Some issues here, but the most serious one is bundling. (It basically doesn't
matter that upstream is bundling.)
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044607
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #8 from Will Benton ---
We also need to work from a pristine source and a patchset. Since the delta
between upstream and Tim's fork is very large (primarily due to removing
binaries), the package should probably remove binaries in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044607
--- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande ---
Hi Susi.
- I don't see any License file in the sources although all files are released
with a 'BSD (3 clause)' license according to their headers.
I think you should include a License text.
http://fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043283
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
shogun-3.1.0-0.9.git20131219.207a709.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shogun-3.1.0-0.9.git20131219.207a709.fc20
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #9 from Timothy St. Clair ---
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
mesos-devel should own %{includedir}/mesos. Currently stout and
libprocess are in there as well, but these probably shouldn't be.
[
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044607
--- Comment #3 from Susi Lehtola ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #2)
> Hi Susi.
>
> - I don't see any License file in the sources although all files are
> released with a 'BSD (3 clause)' license according to their headers.
> I t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044607
--- Comment #4 from Susi Lehtola ---
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #3)
> Adding license texts separate from upstream is explicitly forbidden.
> And asking upstream to add the text is a SHOULD.
I've now asked upstream to add a license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041924
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jama...@fc.up.pt
--- Comment #14 from Jo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034492
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jedelsky ---
Is there anyone for a review? :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041924
--- Comment #15 from Andy Lutomirski ---
(In reply to José Matos from comment #14)
> (In reply to Andy Lutomirski from comment #12)
> > (Am I supposed to bump the revision number on review versions? I couldn't
> > find a good answer to that.)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016221
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(bjoern.esser@gmai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036754
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035897
Bug 1035897 depends on bug 1036754, which changed state.
Bug 1036754 Summary: Review Request: ttembed - Remove embedding limitations
from TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036754
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029068
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-googlecode-tools-0-0 |golang-googlecode-tools-0-0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024134
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|lynis-1.3.7-1.fc19 |lynis-1.3.7-1.fc20
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025196
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036915
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029068
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-googlecode-tools-0-0 |golang-googlecode-tools-0-0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|libsodium-0.4.5-3.fc20 |libsodium-0.4.5-3.fc19
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045141
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041924
--- Comment #16 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Andy Lutomirski from comment #15)
> (In reply to José Matos from comment #14)
> > (In reply to Andy Lutomirski from comment #12)
> > > (Am I supposed to bump the revision number on review ve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041924
--- Comment #17 from Andy Lutomirski ---
Touché. It probably doesn't help that I misspelled the URL.
Spec URL: http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/fish-2.1.0-5_/fish.spec
SRPM URL:
http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/fish-2.1.0-5_/fish-2.1.0-5.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034492
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
You need to find a sponsor proactively...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #58 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
Thank You ^_^
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: gnulib
Short Description: GNU Portability Library
Owners: moceap zbyszek
Branches: f19 f20
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
Mosaab Alzoubi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025972
Thomas Spura changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment
90 matches
Mail list logo