https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000662
--- Comment #74 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #73)
Misformatted request, and no epel7 branches are being created yet.
ahh I see I should've used New Branches. Thanks for the headsup!
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012391
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887821
Johan Swensson k...@kupo.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827
--- Comment #4 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3)
Please use sed to do the hack, no need to use dos2unix(may also change the
timestamp).
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #4 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 845100
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=845100action=edit
Makefile patch
As Ralf pointed out, you need to stop the environment CFLAGS overriding the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #12 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
No, I just mean the new specfile/srpm, addressing the issues in comment #6.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047510
--- Comment #10 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de ---
Spec URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-opencloud.spec
SRPM URL: http://brummbq.fedorapeople.org/php-opencloud-1.6.0-2.fc19.src.rpm
I've followed remis suggestion from comment 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046812
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package jupp-26-1.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
--- Comment #8 from Will Benton wi...@redhat.com ---
Hi Gil,
Thanks for your review. I've updated the package in place to fix all of your
concerns, including replacing the bundled code with equivalent functionality
from the Java standard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047510
--- Comment #11 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
Gregor: I'm still buried deep in autoloader theory, but I'm starting to think
my approach is bad and yours is good. The convention seems to be to be
relatively conservative with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9)
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877096
--- Comment #27 from John Heidemann jo...@isi.edu ---
A new release is out:
https://www.isi.edu/~johnh/SOFTWARE/FSDB/perl-Fsdb-2.48-1.fc20.src.rpm
The spec is in the SRPM, or at
https://www.isi.edu/~johnh/SOFTWARE/FSDB/perl-Fsdb.spec
This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
--- Comment #10 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com ---
I am asking owncloud upstream if there is any reason they use that version of
qtkeychain or if using the 0.1.0 or latest version could cause unexpected
problems.
As soon I get the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048410
Bug ID: 1048410
Summary: Review Request: calendarserver - Standards-compliant
server implementing the CalDAV and CardDAV
protocols
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
--- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
Also it has a tag 0.1.0, so your version should be 0.1.0.git(DATE).(COMMIT)
Uh, no, snapshot dates do not belong in Version, but Release.
In this case, it is a post-release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048410
--- Comment #1 from Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com ---
Current src.rpm (which builds in mock, but doesn't work for missing
dependencies) is on
http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/calendarserver-5.1-0.el7.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010613
--- Comment #10 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com ---
ok
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048410
--- Comment #2 from Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com ---
koji build is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6356596
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #11)
Also it has a tag 0.1.0, so your version should be 0.1.0.git(DATE).(COMMIT)
Uh, no, snapshot dates do not belong in Version, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797330
--- Comment #24 from Jeremy Newton alexjn...@gmail.com ---
Doesn't filesystem own pixmaps? Also what would you advise to fix this issue?
I take this is the only real issue for approval?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797330
--- Comment #25 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #24)
Doesn't filesystem own pixmaps? Also what would you advise to fix this issue?
I take this is the only real issue for approval?
It
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037443
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Björn besser82 Esser from comment #8)
I'm absolutely fine with Christopher had taken over and reviewed this. :D
Great. Thanks for your understanding.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046688
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to David Tardon from comment #7)
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #6)
David, will netsurf* be available for f20?
I do not plan to make any of the packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
Will Benton wi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046690
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797330
--- Comment #26 from Jeremy Newton alexjn...@gmail.com ---
I'm sorry, I'm a little confused.
How would I add ownership of the xsensors directory?
Are you implying I need to add
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}
to the file list?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046691
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797330
--- Comment #27 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Let's see:
1. %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}/default.xpm
So, you put the icon underneath dir %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}/.
Now you just wrote %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}/default.xpm,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044884
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044884
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Role-Basic-0.13-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Role-Basic-0.13-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044884
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Role-Basic-0.13-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Role-Basic-0.13-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797330
--- Comment #28 from Jeremy Newton alexjn...@gmail.com ---
Oh, very good point :)
Here you go:
SPEC:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/xsensors.spec
SRPM:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/xsensors-0.72-1.fc20.src.rpm
Let me know if I missed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797330
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916039
--- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com ---
Sorry Mario. I've been busy holidaying. I'll provide an update this week.
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116
--- Comment #23 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
0.6.2 is ready.
Use %_qt5_qmake.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797330
Jeremy Newton alexjn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046121
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046122
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047655
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046813
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046125
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046813
--- Comment #4 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
(In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #2)
One thing:
* Please write your real name on all history in %changelog
Great catch - I will fix before importing.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046690
David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046691
David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047109
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047109
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Created attachment 845209
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=845209action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30
Command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047109
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048107
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
201 - 253 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
