https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047510
--- Comment #12 from Adam Williamson ---
My new PR for OC's autoloader is https://github.com/owncloud/core/pull/6628 .
It should still find anything that's in a PSR-0 compliant location wrt the
include_path, and so does your patch that we curr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047510
--- Comment #13 from Adam Williamson ---
Oh, for composer stuff - composer's autoloader has the ability to fall back to
trying to load the PSR-0 class path relative to the system include path (which
is what we're implicitly expecting when we p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
--- Comment #8 from Remi Collet ---
Created attachment 845222
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=845222&action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977141
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen ---
Or can upstream push an update to help?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
--- Comment #10 from Remi Collet ---
@adam, @shawn, isn't an update to 2.4.2 (release 2 days ago) not simpler ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977141
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tchollingswo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
--- Comment #11 from Remi Collet ---
@shawn: Minor bash style, instead of "cat foo | sed xxx >bar", simply use "sed
xxx foo >bar"
So:
sed
's#Doctrine/Common/ClassLoader.php#%{_datadir}/php/Doctrine/Common/ClassLoader.php#'
\
bin/doctrine-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977122
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen ---
Ping?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
--- Comment #12 from Remi Collet ---
also: "install -pm 755" seems simpler than "chmod + cp"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
--- Comment #13 from Adam Williamson ---
Yeah, I think a bump to 2.4.2 would save us shipping a bunch of patches.
Sorry I didn't get around to testing OC 6 + Doctrine 2.4 yet, I got sidetracked
by the autoloader black hole. I'll try and get t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047655
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Mamor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048107
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Mamor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047111
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047111
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #845255|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047111
--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet ---
Created attachment 845257
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=845257&action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047111
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #5 from Remi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045582
--- Comment #1 from Remi Collet ---
You probably can clean this package to use new php-doctrine-* packages, so
clean the dependencies and dir ownership.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034413
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Ig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026432
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037443
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048460
Bug ID: 1048460
Summary: Review Request: hawaii-shell - Hawaii shell for
desktop, netbook and tablet
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: Package Review
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026432
--- Comment #2 from Philip Withnall ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #1)
> Bustle looks nice... I can probably sponsor you.
Great, thanks! Would you be able to review the pcap bindings please? I’ve got a
mostly-complete Bustle .spe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048460
--- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel ---
Scratch build fairly happy:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6358899
Built with following build overrides: libqtxdg-0.5.0-1.20131113gitf27fc3f.fc20,
greenisland-0.2.0.1-1.fc20, qt5-qtco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015752
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@rasmil.dk
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048039
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|qt5-qts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048040
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|qt5-qts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048260
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|qt5-qtl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048259
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|qt5-qtc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048481
Bug ID: 1048481
Summary: Review Request: sandbox-runner-data - Basic
directories for Sandbox Runners miscellanious data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951582
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1048482
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951582
--- Comment #22 from Michael Schwendt ---
Since the -static Provides are only for BuildRequires and tracking usage of
static libs, they cannot be arch-specific using %?_isa. It would be
"BuildRequires: psi4-static" in other packages.
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951582
Bug 951582 depends on bug 1048482, which changed state.
Bug 1048482 Summary: psi4 : does not adhere to Static Library Packaging
Guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048482
What|Removed |Adde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951582
--- Comment #23 from Susi Lehtola ---
Ugh, right, the provide doesn't do both. Fixed in rawhide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046125
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Shawn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046122
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Shawn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046121
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Shawn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048460
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986051
--- Comment #11 from Till Maas ---
Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/dtv-scan-tables.spec
SRPM URL:
http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/dtv-scan-tables-0-3.20130713gitd913405.fc19.src.rpm
Sorry, I thought I already updated the requ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
Bug ID: 1048493
Summary: Review Request: icecat - GNU version of Firefox
browser
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||icecat
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984605
--- Comment #10 from marcindulak ---
Nwchem 6.3.2 ready for review
koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6359089
Spec URL:
http://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/nwchem/r02v02/nwchem.spec
SRPM URL:
http://marcindulak.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046513
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043305
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011960
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020309
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043305
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|epix-1.2.13-3.fc20 |epix-1.2.13-3.fc19
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048523
Bug ID: 1048523
Summary: Review Request: vdr-softhddevice - A software and GPU
emulated HD output device plugin for VDR
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047590
--- Comment #1 from Paul Wouters ---
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/python-gnupg/python-gnupg.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/python-gnupg/python-gnupg-0.3.5-3.fc20.src.rpm
Sat Jan 04 2014 Paul Wouters - 0.3.5-3
- Remove unused global, fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047478
--- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-irods/php-irods.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-irods/php-irods-3.3.0-0.2.beta1.fc21.src.rpm
All of the above addressed, couple of othe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047596
--- Comment #8 from Adam Williamson ---
Just a note on the namespace conflict problem: see
https://github.com/phpseclib/phpseclib/issues/243 . Upstream has a 'php5'
branch they're working on, and they plan to namespace phpseclib as part of tha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810376
--- Comment #12 from Pete Zaitcev ---
Mattew, any plans for python3-pypng? I threw together a quick-fix SPEC
based on yours:
http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/tmp/python-pypng-0.0.16-1.z1.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810376
--- Comment #13 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Does anyone mind if I take over the review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
--- Comment #13 from Joseph Marrero ---
I seems we need that version for it to work fine with mirall-1.5.0 until the
qtkeychain 2.0 version comes
Am 04.01.2014 um 02:39 schrieb Joseph Marrero:
> I am packaging libqtkeychain for fedora and I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047599
--- Comment #8 from Adam Williamson ---
On the licensing issue: the license is included inline in each of the actual
source files. I don't believe this is a violation of the license itself or of
Fedora's licensing policies, and I don't believe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
--- Comment #14 from Joseph Marrero ---
forgot to point out that the info after my initial comment is from the owncloud
mailing list that. Daniel is one of the main developers of the owncloud-client.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
--- Comment #15 from Joseph Marrero ---
Spec URL:
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/qtkeychain/qtkeychain.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ece.uprm.edu/jmarrero/fedora_packaging/qtkeychain/qtkeychain-0.1.0-3.20130805git.fc19.src.rpm
old spe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004053
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||erat.si...@gmail.com
Fl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047527
Joseph Marrero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmarr...@gmail.com
Assignee|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047525
Joseph Marrero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmarr...@gmail.com
Assignee|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047414
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
ioping-0.8-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ioping-0.8-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047414
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
ioping-0.8-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ioping-0.8-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047414
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047414
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
ioping-0.8-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ioping-0.8-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047525
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Marrero ---
License: OK
Macros: OK
Install: OK
Naming: OK
Sources: OK
Scriptlets: OK
APPROVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047525
Joseph Marrero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014738
--- Comment #28 from Christopher Meng ---
Failed at %check: http://ur1.ca/gc45y
Caused by new hdf5 version in Rawhide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047527
Joseph Marrero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047109
--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Updates:
- Conditional %{?dist}
- Removed php-channel-doctrine obsolete
Diff:
https://github.com/siwinski/rpms/commit/82df10ec8d3d744848659485a4cd1000981357a1
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/siwinski/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
--- Comment #14 from Shawn Iwinski ---
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #10)
> @adam, @shawn, isn't an update to 2.4.2 (release 2 days ago) not simpler ?
Yep! I did not notice the release announcement. THANKS!
(In reply to Remi Collet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047111
--- Comment #6 from Shawn Iwinski ---
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #5)
> [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
> From composer.json
> "symfony/console": "~2.0"
> "symfony/yaml": "~2.1",
> So you can't u
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
--- Comment #15 from Adam Williamson ---
if it's not too much trouble can you stick a build in your repo? then I can do
some testing on my test OC instance. thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048559
Bug ID: 1048559
Summary: Review Request: qt-creator 1.3.1 - Lightweight and
cross-platform IDE for Qt
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045582
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Updates:
- Use non-PEAR Doctrine pkgs
- Conditional %{?dist}
Spec Diff:
https://github.com/siwinski/rpms/commit/b149121c40fd6570f641f4f8eccc7666c9c6abf3
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/siwinski/rpms/b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044929
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044884
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951582
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044929
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Date-Extract-0.04-1.fc |perl-Date-Extract-0.04-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
--- Comment #16 from Shawn Iwinski ---
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #15)
> if it's not too much trouble can you stick a build in your repo? then I can
> do some testing on my test OC instance. thanks!
Completed. Enjoy! :)
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047109
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Remi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951582
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|psi4-4.0-0.8.b5.fc19|psi4-4.0-0.8.b5.fc20
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #17 from Rem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047599
--- Comment #9 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-math-biginteger/php-phpseclib-math-biginteger.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-math-biginteger/php-phpseclib-math-big
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047601
--- Comment #2 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-blowfish/php-phpseclib-crypt-blowfish.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-blowfish/php-phpseclib-crypt-blowf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047608
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-rsa/php-phpseclib-crypt-rsa.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-rsa/php-phpseclib-crypt-rsa-0.3.5-2.fc21.src
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047111
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Remi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047612
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-net-sftp/php-phpseclib-net-sftp.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-net-sftp/php-phpseclib-net-sftp-0.3.5-2.fc21.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047611
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-net-ssh2/php-phpseclib-net-ssh2.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-net-ssh2/php-phpseclib-net-ssh2-0.3.5-2.fc21.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047602
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-des/php-phpseclib-crypt-des.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-des/php-phpseclib-crypt-des-0.3.5-2.fc21.src
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047609
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-tripledes/php-phpseclib-crypt-tripledes.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-tripledes/php-phpseclib-crypt-tr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047600
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-aes/php-phpseclib-crypt-aes.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-aes/php-phpseclib-crypt-aes-0.3.5-2.fc21.src
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047603
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-hash/php-phpseclib-crypt-hash.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-hash/php-phpseclib-crypt-hash-0.3.5-2.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047604
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-random/php-phpseclib-crypt-random.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-random/php-phpseclib-crypt-random-0.3.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047605
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-rc4/php-phpseclib-crypt-rc4.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-rc4/php-phpseclib-crypt-rc4-0.3.5-2.fc21.src
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047610
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-twofish/php-phpseclib-crypt-twofish.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-twofish/php-phpseclib-crypt-twofish-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047607
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson ---
Updated:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-rijndael/php-phpseclib-crypt-rijndael.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-phpseclib-crypt-rijndael/php-phpseclib-crypt-rijnd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045582
--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet ---
Created attachment 845701
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=845701&action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-r
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo