https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046842
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027383
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|gfal2-util-0.2.1-1.fc19 |gfal2-util-0.2.1-1.fc20
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036254
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|hamster-time-tracker-1.03.3 |hamster-time-tracker-1.03.3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046693
--- Comment #2 from David Tardon ---
Spec URL: http://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/libhubbub.spec
SRPM URL: http://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/libhubbub-0.2.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916039
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044894
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027383
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|gfal2-util-0.2.1-1.el5 |gfal2-util-0.2.1-1.fc19
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046692
--- Comment #1 from David Tardon ---
Spec URL: http://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/libcss.spec
SRPM URL: http://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/libcss-0.2.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040459
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047525
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #25 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048621
--- Comment #9 from Volker Fröhlich ---
Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/zabbix22.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/zabbix22-2.2.1-2.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048621
--- Comment #8 from Volker Fröhlich ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #5)
> Some general comments:
>
> - Start with a fresh %changelog
> - If this is really EPEL only, why keep all of the Fedora conditionals?
>
So far I tried to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047785
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng ---
OK.
PACKAGE APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047785
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026432
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026764
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049714
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049714
Bug ID: 1049714
Summary: Review Request: ghc-regex-compat - Haskell regexp
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049714
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6371851
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046693
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng ---
OPTFLAGS issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046690
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng ---
Oh...Sorry, I forgot to say about compiler flags...
David, all of these netsurf packages seem don't value the optflags and ldflags,
please fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033987
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033987
Jeff Fearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jfe...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Je
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885357
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1000885 (DESIGN-SW)
Referenced Bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885357
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885357
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
Onyeibo Oku is also interested in this software, hope you two can work well
with each other.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885357
--- Comment #4 from Dan Eicher ---
Created attachment 846929
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=846929&action=edit
the spec file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885357
--- Comment #3 from Dan Eicher ---
Updated to OSL-1.4.1
koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6371797
src.rpm:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1798/6371798/OpenShadingLanguage-1.4.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
Not t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885357
Dan Eicher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|885347 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
--- Comment #27 from Adam Williamson ---
I tried testing pgsql, but couldn't get initial setup with OC 5 to work at all.
Kept complaining about the pgsql username/password being wrong, even though it
worked at a console. I probably don't grok
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049207
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|Ready |
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049207
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Jens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956
--- Comment #12 from Mark McKinstry ---
Hi Christopher,
Your spec doesn't differ that much from mine so feel free to use whichever
you'd prefer. Lemme know what the URL are for the spec and src.rpm and I'd be
happy to review it.
I dunno how I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
--- Comment #26 from Adam Williamson ---
Yup, works. Sent to Rawhide. Also tested an OC 5.0.14a to 6.0.0a upgrade with
sqlite successfully, will test pgsql if I can.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
--- Comment #25 from Adam Williamson ---
Ah, so I think I found out what happened. Upstream Doctrine reverted one of the
OwnCloud fixes immediately after applying it:
https://github.com/doctrine/dbal/pull/363#issuecomment-31794747
I'll test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027383
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|gfal2-util-0.2.1-1.el6 |gfal2-util-0.2.1-1.el5
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027383
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||gfal2-util-0.2.1-1.el6
R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048966
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047590
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
--- Comment #4 from Peter Oliver ---
Spec URL: http://mavit.fedorapeople.org/rpm/google-android-emoji-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mavit.fedorapeople.org/rpm/google-android-emoji-fonts-1.01-1.20120228git.fc21.src.rpm
Having consulted
https://f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026432
--- Comment #7 from Philip Withnall ---
(In reply to Philip Withnall from comment #6)
> I've just started the process of getting a Hackage account to release Bustle
> there.
Done:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/bustle-0.4.3
(Note that th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049634
Paul Wouters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|puiterw...@redhat.com
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #7 from Volker Fröhlich ---
I'll try to build saga 2.1. It requires wx > 2.8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049634
Bug ID: 1049634
Summary: Review Request: python-pymilter - Python interface to
sendmail milter API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026432
--- Comment #6 from Philip Withnall ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #3)
> If you can update with these minor changes I am happy to approve
> the package and sponsor you. I would also like to help review
> bustle (any plans to rele
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116
--- Comment #24 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
---
Changes:
https://github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/commit/55152b915ee1cb22b3e29f417a7167e925822c9b
Spec:
https://raw.github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/55152b915ee1cb22b3e29f417a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026432
--- Comment #5 from Philip Withnall ---
Thanks for the review. I've updated the .spec file and SRPM here:
• Spec URL: http://people.collabora.co.uk/~pwith/packaging/ghc-pcap.spec
• SRPM URL:
http://people.collabora.co.uk/~pwith/packaging/ghc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048618
--- Comment #3 from David King ---
Ah, that looks fine then. Thanks for the explanation!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048618
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #2 from Eric Smith ---
Act
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #30 from Jake Petroules ---
Hello from qbs upstream.
We certainly intend for non-Qt projects to use qbs. It has a very modular
design and pretty much the only Qt-specific bits are the (qml/js) Qt modules.
The majority of its sellin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046691
Ville Skyttä changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046693
Bug 1046693 depends on bug 1046691, which changed state.
Bug 1046691 Summary: Review Request: libparserutils - a library for building
efficient parsers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046691
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de...@fateyev.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046692
Bug 1046692 depends on bug 1046691, which changed state.
Bug 1046691 Summary: Review Request: libparserutils - a library for building
efficient parsers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046691
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045476
Cristian Ciupitu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #11 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045476
Cristian Ciupitu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cristian.ciup...@yahoo.com
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #29 from Erik Schilling ---
Sure I do. Especially on longer term when qbs is default for Qt (just like
qmake).
I also work on a project which currently uses qbs as secondary build system
which I hope to be able make as primary one
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046690
--- Comment #5 from Ville Skyttä ---
(In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #4)
Oops, meant
-make %{?_smp_mflags} %{make_vars}
+CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" make %{?_smp_mflags} %{make_vars}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045476
Cristian Ciupitu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akozu...@redhat.com
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046692
Bug 1046692 depends on bug 1046690, which changed state.
Bug 1046690 Summary: Review Request: libwapcaplet - a string internment library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046690
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046690
Ville Skyttä changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #28 from Kevin Kofler ---
But the thing is: Do you really expect non-Qt projects to use qbs? If not, it's
pointless to split support for Qt projects into subpackages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #27 from Erik Schilling ---
UPDATE:
Here are already two pending additions which would not depend on either -qt nor
-cpp:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,69984
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,55797
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049547
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1049549
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049549
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1049546
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049546
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fedora-mingw@lists.fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #26 from Erik Schilling ---
Generally -devel because i only need that if i want to compile my own modules
against qbs,
-gui to prevent pulling in qt5-qtbase-gui with all it's dependencies where i do
not want it
-examples since i usu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049557
Bug ID: 1049557
Summary: Review Request: jpeginfo - Utility to obtain
information from JPEG files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049549
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fedora-mingw@lists.fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049547
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1049546
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049548
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1049546
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049550
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1049546
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049551
Bug ID: 1049551
Summary: Review Request: jpegoptim - Utility to optimize JPEG
files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049550
Bug ID: 1049550
Summary: Review Request: mingw-LibRaw - MinGW Windows LibRaw
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049546
Bug ID: 1049546
Summary: Review Request: mingw-freeimage - MinGW Windows
freeimage library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049549
Bug ID: 1049549
Summary: Review Request: mingw-OpenEXR - MinGW Windows OpenEXR
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049548
Bug ID: 1049548
Summary: Review Request: mingw-libmng - MinGW Windows libmng
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049547
Bug ID: 1049547
Summary: Review Request: mingw-ilmbase - MinGW Windows ilmbase
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
qtkeychain-0.1.0-4.20130805git.fc20,owncloud-csync-0.91.4-1.fc20,mirall-1.5.0-1.fc20
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qtkeychain-0.1.0-4.201308
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
qtkeychain-0.1.0-4.20130805git.fc19,owncloud-csync-0.91.4-1.fc19,mirall-1.5.0-1.fc19
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qtkeychain-0.1.0-4.201308
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046340
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045476
--- Comment #8 from Ales Kozumplik ---
Hey, uploaded even newer version. Fixes the unused buildrequires and perms:
http://akozumpl.fedorapeople.org/dnf-plugins-core.spec
http://akozumpl.fedorapeople.org/dnf-plugins-core-561c107.tar.xz
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(d...@danny.cz)
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047111
Bug 1047111 depends on bug 1047110, which changed state.
Bug 1047110 Summary: Review Request: php-doctrine-dbal - Doctrine Database
Abstraction Layer (DBAL)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(awilliam@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989850
--- Comment #7 from Michael Cronenworth ---
Updated to latest upstream + review fixes.
New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-libmicrohttpd.spec
New SRPM:
http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-libmicrohttpd-0.9.33-1.fc20.src.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047785
--- Comment #3 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
- Delete un-needed lines.
- Fix license line.
===
Spec URL: http://ojuba.org/oji/SPECS/python-pyarabic.spec
SRPM URL: http://ojuba.org/oji/SRPMS/python-pyarabic-0.4-2.oji.fc19.src.rp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047110
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(awilliam@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047497
--- Comment #6 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
1. What's the difficulty of can't write description in the field but using a
macro to accomplish?
>> Doing that to write desciption just one time :) .
3. I don't understand why you hacked so many makefi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048667
--- Comment #8 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda ---
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #7)
> > - As for the tests, have you tried removing the requirements.txt prior to
> > executing the test suite? That should help, IMHO.
>
> setup.py s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044894
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Crypt-X509-0.51-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-X509-0.51-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044894
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044894
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Crypt-X509-0.51-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-X509-0.51-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049495
Bug ID: 1049495
Summary: Review Request: perl-App-FatPacker - Pack dependencies
onto a script file
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989847
--- Comment #7 from Michael Cronenworth ---
Applied review fixes.
New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-plibc.spec
New SRPM:
http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-plibc-0.1.7-0.2.20130812svn147.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047590
Paul Wouters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|RELEASE_PENDING
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047610
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047590
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-gnupg-0.3.5-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-gnupg-0.3.5-4.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
