https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062686
--- Comment #3 from Yanko Kaneti ---
Thanks for the review. I've incorporated most of the changes.
IMO AUTHORS and NEWS belong in the main package.
0.2.0-3
- Incorporate most changes suggested in the review (#1062686)
Spec URL: http://decle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062668
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |pa...@hubbitus.info
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061901
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061801
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng ---
11. I guess your spec is copied from somewhere(whole build process doesn't
require qt4), no problem, just build zart. But one note is that Fedora has
%qmake_qt4 macro to build, so if normal build is not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061801
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Chris
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019428
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-alchimia-0.4-3.fc19 |python-alchimia-0.4-3.fc20
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031569
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019428
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048667
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #26 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513307
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783016
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|cicku...@gmail.com |
--- Comment #34 from Christopher M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783016
--- Comment #33 from Andres Pascasio ---
Hello
I wonder if there is any observation on the package?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||cvechecker
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB)
Referenced Bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808
Bug ID: 1062808
Summary: Review Request: cvechecker - Command-line utility to
scan the system based on CVE data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841
--- Comment #7 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
> [?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525929
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058628
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||linode-cli
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058623
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
Ignore your thought for a while ;) But I've filed an issue at upstream:
Fixed:
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/perl-WebService-Linode.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/perl-WebService-Linode-0.18-1.fc21.src.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061901
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055395
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Thanks for the review -- feedback incorporated in -2:
Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/ocaml/ocaml-xmlm.spec
SRPM URL:
http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/ocaml/ocaml-xmlm-1.2.0-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng ---
Issue forgot to paste here:
5. Missing requires of xdg-utils. (src/rig.cxx)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package cont
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062686
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
I learned that xvfb may be used to supersede X for checking, not sure if it
works at here.
SPEC:
1. %{_includedir}//libmediaart-1.0
-->
%{_includedir}/libmediaart-1.0
2. find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006104
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Meng ---
Reported to upstream:
https://github.com/csete/gqrx/issues/150
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006104
--- Comment #18 from Christopher Meng ---
Also,
%qmake_qt4 PREFIX=/usr
/usr should be replaced by %{_prefix}.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006104
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006104
--- Comment #16 from Josh Bressers ---
Thanks for the quick turnaround.
Here we go again:
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~bressers/gqrx-review/gqrx.spec
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~bressers/gqrx-review/gqrx-2.2.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062686
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948359
--- Comment #29 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Steve Grubb from comment #28)
> Out of curiosity, why is this package not pushed?
He must be a RDO staff! LOL
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng ---
I mean those who still receive updates ;) Don't package dead upstream tools
unless they can work well and still useful for end users...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062542
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
Fixed:
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/libdatrie.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/libdatrie-0.2.8-2.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006104
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|cicku...@gmail.com |
--- Comment #15 from Christopher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062786
Benjamin Gilbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||Trivial
--- Comment #1 from Benjam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062786
Bug ID: 1062786
Summary: Review Request: openslide-python - Python bindings for
the OpenSlide library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062757
Bug ID: 1062757
Summary: Review Request: glite-lb-logger-msg - Plugin for
sending L&B notifications to messaging infrastructure
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048667
--- Comment #25 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
(In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #24)
> (In reply to Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda from comment #19)
> > (In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #18)
> > > (In reply to Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda from co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048667
Ville Skyttä changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED
Assignee|bkab...@redh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055396
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
The first eight issues are repeats from the previous reviews:
1) Remove the internal dependency generator workarounds.
2) Build a usable -debuginfo package on platforms that generate binary code.
3) The b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062324
--- Comment #8 from Adam Williamson ---
nice! I'm actually planning to test it on baytrail today, if I ever finish
shaving this yak herd.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062324
--- Comment #7 from Simon Farnsworth ---
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #6)
> I tested it briefly on Rawhide and it seemed to work, FWIW - loaded an h.264
> HD video in Totem and it played with <10% CPU usage (with the driver
> inst
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #16 from Richard Shaw ---
I need another package like I need a hole in the head but I will if no one else
will :)
I'm pretty swamped right now at home and work but when I get a chance I'll diff
the two specs and take what I like f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006104
Josh Bressers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(bressers@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055395
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
The first eight issues are repeats from the previous reviews:
1) Remove the internal dependency generator workarounds.
2) Build a usable -debuginfo package on platforms that generate binary code.
3) The b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810376
--- Comment #18 from Pete Zaitcev ---
(In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #16)
> Pete, do you want to be a co-maintainer?
Yeah, I'll take it. If Spot maintains 300 packages...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841
--- Comment #3 from Richard Shaw ---
I packaged the ones I thought most commonly used but I'm open to packaging some
of the others, however, one or two have not been updated in quite some time so
I'm not sure of their usefulness.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062291
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062291
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-speex-1.2-0.16.rc1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-speex-1.2-0.16.rc1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062291
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-speex-1.2-0.16.rc1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-speex-1.2-0.16.rc1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008063
Bug 1008063 depends on bug 1010479, which changed state.
Bug 1010479 Summary: Binary name conflict with python-ase and
the_silver_searcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010479
What|Removed |Adde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055398
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055396
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055395
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810376
--- Comment #17 from Jerry James ---
Please pardon yet another 3rd party jumping in with proposed spec file
enhancements:
http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pypng/
This incorporates all of the suggestions above, and also:
- Uses upstream's tar.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050733
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
my...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062686
--- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti ---
0.2.0-2
- Qt can be ignored, its only there for systems without gdk-pixbuf
Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/libmediaart/libmediaart.spec
SRPM URL:
http://declera.com/~yaneti/libmediaart/libmediaart-0.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062324
--- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson ---
I tested it briefly on Rawhide and it seemed to work, FWIW - loaded an h.264 HD
video in Totem and it played with <10% CPU usage (with the driver installed:
I'm in Canada, I'm patent-safe :>). vainfo rep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062686
Bug ID: 1062686
Summary: Review Request: libmediaart - Manage and cache media
art
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948359
Steve Grubb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sgr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #28 from S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062668
Bug ID: 1062668
Summary: Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a
spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062668
Fabio Alessandro Locati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048667
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
python-docker-py-0.2.3-6.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-docker-py-0.2.3-6.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048667
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
python-docker-py-0.2.3-6.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-docker-py-0.2.3-6.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048667
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
python-docker-py-0.2.3-6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-docker-py-0.2.3-6.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062542
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt ---
%check
make check
is missing.
> %files devel
> %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS README*
> %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-devel
This causes "File listed twice" warnings on F20 or newer due to the unversioned
doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055126
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
nfdump-1.6.11-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfdump-1.6.11-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055126
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
nfdump-1.6.11-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfdump-1.6.11-1.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055126
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
nfdump-1.6.11-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfdump-1.6.11-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055126
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
nfdump-1.6.11-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfdump-1.6.11-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055126
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884759
Zuzana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1062632
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055126
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022584
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055126
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022584
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062623
Bug ID: 1062623
Summary: Review Request: arm-none-eabi-gdb - GDB for (remote)
debugging ARM targets
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991294
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884759
--- Comment #17 from Christopher Meng ---
Then you need to report a bug against libcaca via:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&version=rawhide&component=libcaca
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884759
--- Comment #16 from Zuzana ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #15)
> 1. The latest version is 0.3. Please read comment 3 carefully.
Toilet 0.3 requires libcaca library at least in version 0.99.beta18 but it is
not available in a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022584
Darryl L. Pierce changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985640
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
2ping-2.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/2ping-2.0-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055126
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Denis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062291
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062291
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985640
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985640
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317
--- Comment #30 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062291
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062291
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from David
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062291
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(val...@civ.zcu.cz |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970411
--- Comment #2 from David King ---
I have made the changes which reflect my review comments (as I needed libid3tag
for a MinGW version of EasyTAG), which you can find in one of my github
repositories:
https://github.com/amigadave/easytag-dlls-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970411
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Comment #1 from David King
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019428
Vladan Popovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment #20 is|1 |0
private|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062324
Simon Farnsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062291
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz
Flags|
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
