https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051840
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|Ready |NotReady
--- Comment #7 from Christ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
--- Comment #8 from David Dick ---
New koji build provided at
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6515863
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058623
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #6)
> 3. What's your FAS username?
ddick, mentioned already.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062315
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062786
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Gilbert ---
Thanks for the review.
%with_python3: Done. (Note that OpenSlide Python requires OpenSlide >= 3.4.0,
which I don't expect will ever be packaged for EPEL 6 due to the EPEL updates
policy. But the EL 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #26 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #25)
> (In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #24)
> > (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #23)
> > > Ok, I've updated my spec file based on the comments so far
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055396
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055395
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #25 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #24)
> (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #23)
> > Ok, I've updated my spec file based on the comments so far but I want to
> > make sure it's not possible/pract
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #24 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #22)
> (In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #21)
> > My confusion mainly revolves around the fact that alternatives would imply
> > that the same functionality is pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
--- Comment #8 from Richard Shaw ---
Ok, I have updated the license tag to:
License:GPLv3+ and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+
I admit licenses are not my strong suit so does this look correct?
In looking at the configure script it doesn't look
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #23 from Richard Shaw ---
Ok, I've updated my spec file based on the comments so far but I want to make
sure it's not possible/practical to create a parallel installable devel package
before we implement a Conflict with it.
The ba
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062786
--- Comment #3 from Adam Goode ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063525
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Chri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753577
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nonamed...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Murray McAllister from comment #3)
> Hi Christopher,
>
> Do you need any assistance from the Red Hat Security Response team regarding
> this package?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Murray McAllist
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063525
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DEFERRED|WONTFIX
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063525
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808
Murray McAllister changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmcal...@redhat.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057919
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #2)
> > Summary:A library for highly efficient multi-dimensional array
>
> I would find it worthwhile to mention that it's a header-only library or
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043573
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #4)
> Full review below. Issues:
> - Missing in post and postun:
> /usr/bin/update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || :
> - These BR are not needed: gc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060277
--- Comment #8 from Pete MacKinnon ---
Spec URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/pig/pig.spec
SRPM URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/pig/pig-0.12.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
Corrected a recently changed (in rawhide) netty3 dependency.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977638
--- Comment #30 from Christopher Meng ---
Still has problems:
1. Missing Requires:espeak in python3 package.
2. No matter python3 package enabled or not, please do this at first:
# Remove bundled egg-info
rm -rf python-espeak.egg-info
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977638
--- Comment #29 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
Spec: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/29661704/0/3/python-espeak.spec
SRPM:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/29661704/0/3/python-espeak-0.5-3.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062843
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062843
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-rosinstall_generator-0.1.7-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-rosinstall_generator-0.1.7-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062843
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-rosinstall_generator-0.1.7-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-rosinstall_generator-0.1.7-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896193
--- Comment #26 from Christopher Meng ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package cont
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@mayorgalinux.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016444
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
Block
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016444
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977638
--- Comment #28 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
I think you did it again ;) also, the links are in 404 status
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977638
--- Comment #27 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Eduardo Mayorga from comment #26)
> Sorry for copying the same link above. Here is the right one:
> Spec:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/29661704/0/3/python-espeak-0.5-3.fc20.
> src.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057766
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063525
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060443
--- Comment #14 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Thanks kevin for sponsoring me. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003188
--- Comment #10 from Mat Booth ---
I have updated the package to a post-release snapshot version of what is
currently the head of upstream's master branch. This version includes support
for PHP 5.5 and proper Eclipse >= 4.3 support:
http://fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060443
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #13 from M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060443
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Kev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057766
--- Comment #15 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
I will get in touch with both upstream groups and see what they think about
doing the above.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834574
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/reflections.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/reflections-0.9.9-0.1.RC1.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057766
--- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Why aren't the minor modifications submitted upstream?
The fedora packaging comittee would have to rule on it, it's possible they
would consider this a 'copylib', ie, a thing people are expected to just c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977638
--- Comment #26 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
Sorry for copying the same link above. Here is the right one:
Spec:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/29661704/0/3/python-espeak-0.5-3.fc20.src.rpm
SRPM:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/29661704/0/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063525
--- Comment #2 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Fixed errors based on fedora-review.
Updated SPEC URL: http://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/gmsh/gmsh.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
http://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/gmsh/gmsh-2.8.4-2.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786636
--- Comment #17 from Ken Dreyer ---
Hi Guillermo, just checking to see if you've had a chance to review those
patches and merge them into your unicorn package? It would be great to get
unicorn into Fedora.
I've updated for the latest Unicorn r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063525
--- Comment #1 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
mock build log - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6514440
koji scratch build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6514440
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063525
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Reference
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063525
Bug ID: 1063525
Summary: Review Request: gmsh - a three-dimensional finite
element mesh generator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800284
Peter Oliver changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #27 from Peter Oliver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061901
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
saclib-2.2.6-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/saclib-2.2.6-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061901
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #22 from Dan Horák ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #21)
> My confusion mainly revolves around the fact that alternatives would imply
> that the same functionality is provided, but this is not the case.
> From what I see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047013
Dan Mashal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046726
Dan Mashal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #21 from Jeremy Newton ---
My confusion mainly revolves around the fact that alternatives would imply that
the same functionality is provided, but this is not the case.
From what I see, moving and patching is the correct way of doi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819134
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819134
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003188
--- Comment #9 from Mat Booth ---
Hmm, F20 wasn't released yet when I submitted this review. It seems to build,
install and work fine on F19, but I will try on a F20 VM to see if I can
reproduce your problem. Thanks for giving it a try :-)
Al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #20 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #19)
> (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #17)
> > Ok, a couple of questions/differences about your spec...
> >
> > 1. You move the bakefiles but Dan's spec mentio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058038
--- Comment #18 from Jeff Backus ---
(In reply to Pavol Ipoth from comment #17)
> This is the spec file:
>
> http://www.symphaty.org/files/systeminfo.spec
>
> and src.rpm which works for EPEL5,6, fedora:
>
> http://www.symphaty.org/files/sy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060277
--- Comment #7 from Pete MacKinnon ---
Spec URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/pig/pig.spec
SRPM URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/pig/pig-0.12.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819134
Alex Wood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aw...@redhat.com
Flags|fedora-c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048667
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
python-docker-py-0.2.3-8.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-docker-py-0.2.3-8.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048667
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
python-docker-py-0.2.3-8.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-docker-py-0.2.3-8.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061901
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000276
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=926034
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063428
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040180
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061901
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000276
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=926034
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048667
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
python-docker-py-0.2.3-8.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-docker-py-0.2.3-8.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061901
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Jerry J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=926034
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Rich Ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000276
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richmat...@gmail.com
Flags|f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906843
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906843
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061901
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
Thanks for the review! Upstream chose today to release version 2.2.6, which is
version 2.2.5 plus all of the patches I submitted upstream. If it's okay with
you, what I will actually import into git is ver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055396
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Jerr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906843
Darryl L. Pierce changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #15 from Da
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055395
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Jerr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057766
--- Comment #13 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
I checked with the developers about this one -
They informed me that they have used Squid source code with minor modifications
directly in the clustal omega source. So, they mention that it would not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060443
--- Comment #11 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Changes made -
* Fixed the changelog
* Added BuildRequires: libICE-devel
* Added more detailed description
* Changed to %setup -q
* Added export CFLAGS="%{optflags}" in %build
Now, it compiles wit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063045
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063045
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
gnome-pkg-tools-0.19.3-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-pkg-tools-0.19.3-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043573
--- Comment #4 from Sandro Mani ---
Full review below. Issues:
- Missing in post and postun:
/usr/bin/update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || :
- These BR are not needed: gcc-c++
- Must require hicolor-icon-theme
- Sould use -p with instal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063428
Bug ID: 1063428
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-bogus - Create fakes to make
your isolated unit tests reliable
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056335
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056335
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
scalacheck-1.11.3-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/scalacheck-1.11.3-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036901
--- Comment #5 from Ken Dreyer ---
Thanks for reviewing. Here's the update to 0.9.0.
* Mon Feb 10 2014 Ken Dreyer - 0.9.0-1
- Update to org-mode 0.9.0
- Remove %%{gem_instdir}/bin/org-ruby from -doc sub-package
Exact changes in Git:
http:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058623
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060443
--- Comment #10 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Yup! That fixes it. :)
I have also addressed Christopher Meng's other comments. I am looking at
Christopher Meng's comment 2 now - IceConnectionNumber. Once I fix that, I will
upload the new spec and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044
--- Comment #3 from Sandro Mani ---
debhelper owns %{perl_vendorlib}/Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/:
$ rpm -ql debhelper
[...]
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Debian/Debhelper/Sequence
[...]
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Debian/Debhelper/Seq
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #2 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060443
--- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #7)
> ./configure with Fedora default flags throws up error.
>
> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/75748/92002850/
>
> I am looking into this and based on the intera
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060651
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Ken D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062314
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Blocks|652183 (FE
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
