https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
OK.
I wil propose a patch to upstream, but use this hack for a while.
If no problems here, please approve. Thanks again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6524731
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7)
OK.
I wil propose a patch to upstream, but use this hack for a while.
If no problems here, please approve. Thanks again.
You did
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060440
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
1. I saw init file, so it meant to be that systemd support need to be added
also.
2. %postun
if [ $1 -ge 1 ] ; then
/sbin/service script condrestart /dev/null 21 || :
fi
What's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #9)
If no problems here, please approve. Thanks again.
You did you change anything on your package? You once againd did increment
the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064713
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047497
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
A koji scratch is needed:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6524991
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001452
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #24 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
New Informations from the developer of nuvola player
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nuvola-player/+bug/1263705/comments/11
...
Anyway, the crashes seems to occur inside webkitgtk and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064455
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Vinzenz Feenstra [evilissimo] from comment #4)
There was a request for them to move to waf (which is a fork of scons)
https://github.com/okamstudio/godot/issues/15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060519
--- Comment #2 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
Yes, that's the source code repository for qm-vamp-plugins (request #1060520).
qm-dsp helper library has repository at
https://code.soundsoftware.ac.uk/projects/qm-dsp/repository .
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044
--- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Ok, sorry missed that. So I take debhelper is also wrong by doing
%dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Debian
%{perl_vendorlib}/Debian/Debhelper
- Filed #1064783.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653917
--- Comment #13 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/gimagereader.spec
SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/gimagereader-2.90-3.fc21.src.rpm
* Thu Feb 13 2014 Sandro Mani
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653917
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #11 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Issues:
- ldconfig is not called in %post and %postun if required.
Note: /sbin/ldconfig not called in libnatpmp
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653917
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
RPM doesn't pick it up because no ldconfig executed, I will fix and post
tomorrow.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #13 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
I thought so as well, but rebuilding with ldconfig didn't help...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #14 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
This is suspect as well:
libnatpmp.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libnatpmp.so.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #14)
This is suspect as well:
libnatpmp.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libnatpmp.so.1
Got it.
Fix tomorrow.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #16 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Just found out that the issue is that libnatpmp.so.1 has permissions 0644, but
auto-provides / auto-depends requires 0755 to work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064455
--- Comment #6 from Vinzenz Feenstra [evilissimo] vfeen...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
(In reply to Vinzenz Feenstra [evilissimo] from comment #4)
Ah yeah see, I missed that, I had that previously but due
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064817
Bug ID: 1064817
Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Soup - HTTP client/server
library for GNOME
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064817
--- Comment #1 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6525284
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064817
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064817
--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Missing BRs:
perl
perl(base), lib/HTTP/Soup.pm:62
perl(DynaLoader), lib/HTTP/Soup.pm:62
perl(File::Spec), Makefile.PL:7
The correct License tag for LGPLv2.1 is LGPLv2, change your License
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209906
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209906
--- Comment #42 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484159
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484159
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800
--- Comment #65 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653917
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036901
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653917
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036901
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057418
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057418
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060651
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057919
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064486
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057919
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064486
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060651
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #25 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
hi guys,
please could you test the version 2.3.0, i've only test this version on
vmware. I know it's not revision 805.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062911
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974
--- Comment #26 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Any objection to me submitting a new review request?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #27
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653917
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gimagereader-2.91-0.1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimagereader-2.91-0.1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653917
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974
--- Comment #28 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #27)
Have you get in touch with Eric Smith? Avoid duplicate works.
No, should I? A little more detail or a link would be helpful for me to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653917
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gimagereader-2.91-0.1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimagereader-2.91-0.1.fc19
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974
--- Comment #29 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Check the link in comment 25 IIUC.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047013
Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(chat-to-me@raveit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974
--- Comment #30 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Thanks, I read the email but didn't catch the author of it, just Tom's
response. I just sent him an email, we'll see what he says.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061902
Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051152
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060440
--- Comment #6 from Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com ---
Updated SPEC http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/calendarserver.spec
Updated SRPM http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/calendarserver-5.1-1.el7.src.rpm
Building in COPR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051152
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051152
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064656
Will Benton wi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039163
Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@ianweller.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051152
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064995
Bug ID: 1064995
Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Slurp-Tiny - A simple, sane
and efficient file slurper
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064995
Leon Weber l...@leonweber.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@leonweber.de
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064656
--- Comment #1 from Will Benton wi...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for packaging this, Marcin. I've successfully built locally and am
waiting for a koji build to complete now. Here are some initial notes on the
package, though:
* The most serious
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036901
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055395
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.sky...@iki.fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064995
--- Comment #2 from Leon Weber l...@leonweber.de ---
(In reply to Leon Weber from comment #1)
- Package probably should not own the dir %{perl_vendorlib}/File/, but its
contents
Oh, actually, it should. Nevermind this point. I had to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064579
David King amigad...@amigadave.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064995
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
- %build section should likely use %{__perl} instead of perl
The guidelines generally discourage the use of macros for commands except where
there's a need for the command path to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com ---
Koji build succeeded:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6527004
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||loganje...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055395
--- Comment #11 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name ---
(In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #10)
Created attachment 862933 [details]
Build with -g
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
2) Build a usable -debuginfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #27 from Harvey Harrison harvey.harri...@gmail.com ---
Sure, at this point I'm down to a single dependency, the Font3D class which
uses tesselation code from the j3dutils package. I don't have huge amounts of
time these days to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061902
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
Oops. Fixed the issue with qepcad.help not being packaged. New URLs:
Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/qepcad/qepcad-B.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064661
Leon Weber l...@leonweber.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@leonweber.de
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089
Luis Pabon lpa...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bjoern.es...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047013
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dan.mashal@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059805
--- Comment #1 from Will Benton wi...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for packaging this, Rob! There are a few problems to address.
Issues and notes:
=
* There is some bundled code included in the project; see below for details.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065054
Bug ID: 1065054
Summary: Review Request: virt-sandbox-runner - Qt wrapper for
virt-sandbox utility
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065054
Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968947
Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||puiterw...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378
Shawn Starr shawn.st...@rogers.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(shawn.starr@roger |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065058
Bug ID: 1065058
Summary: Review Request: textql - Execute SQL against
structured text like CSV or TSV
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065058
Fabio Alessandro Locati fabioloc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065058
Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047013
Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(chat-to-me@raveit |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378
--- Comment #9 from Michael Friedrich michael.friedr...@gmail.com ---
Just a short note with my lead core dev hat on:
Icinga 1.x is ~5 years old after forking from Nagios. It runs smooth and stable
in small and large scale environments and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065058
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Alessandro Locati fabioloc...@gmail.com ---
Hi :),
Thanks for the comment. I've ignored the error since another package is created
(textql-debuginfo-0.0-1.gita7fbbe2.fc20.i686.rpm) which contains all debug
files:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058019
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
The Group tag for runtime libraries is System Environment/Libraries for many
years.
Alternatively, especially for modern releases of Fedora, the tag can be
omitted:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047013
--- Comment #6 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from comment #5)
* Thu Feb 13 2014 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.7.0-1
- update to 1.7.0
- add --with-x configure flag
- use -devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055837
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
(This is not official review)
All publicly posted reviews are official. It's just that for approval there are
special requirements (such as becoming the reviewer to take the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #8)
Ok, I have updated the license tag to:
License:GPLv3+ and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+
I admit licenses are not my strong suit so does
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055799
--- Comment #6 from Will Benton wi...@redhat.com ---
The bundling exception was granted in today's FPC meeting:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-02-13/fpc.2014-02-13-17.00.html
I expect the ticket will be closed out
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024779
--- Comment #6 from Louis Lagendijk lo...@lagendijk.xs4all.nl ---
Thanks for the feedback Christopher,
Re 1. First question, do we need to follow SUSE's way of handling plugins? I
don't agree with the packaging here, one -plugins package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047013
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065058
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986641
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
So do you prefer to continue the review with the current version
or to wait for bumping to shakespeare-1.2?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057919
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #2)
%packagedevel
Treating them like static libs (since the header-only stuff will be built
in) is not a strict requirement
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
