https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070941
--- Comment #7 from Julien Enselme ---
Here is the python-svgwrite-1.1.3-2.fc20.src.rpm:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SRPMS/python-svgwrite-1.1.3-2.fc20.src.rpm
I really thought I put the right link. Sorry.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075047
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen ---
I'm only getting one error when running `npm test`:
1) standalone test-issue-36:
Error: exited with code 8
at ChildProcess.
(/home/tom/rpm/BUILD/package/test/test.js:49:33)
at ChildProce
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066026
--- Comment #11 from Kamil Dudka ---
Sure. I have filed a FESCO ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1253
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066028
--- Comment #8 from Kamil Dudka ---
Sure. I have filed a FESCO ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1253
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075030
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Jamie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075047
--- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Seems like we have three options:
1) Ignore the failing test. I'm really not sure how much impact this will have.
2) Package multiparty@2.1.9 (which uses readable-stream@1.0.x so it can be
patched out eas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075035
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
(In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #1)
> Issues:
> ===
> [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
>
> Test install failed due to dependency on unpackaged send module.
nodejs-send is already pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1069257
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069257
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||674008
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075254
Bug ID: 1075254
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-negotiator - An HTTP content
negotiator for Node.js
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075254
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075031
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1075254
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075031
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/connect/nodejs-serve-index.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/connect/SRPMS/nodejs-serve-index-1.0.1-2.fc21.src.rpm
* Tue Mar 11 2014 Jamie Nguye
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075254
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066672
--- Comment #7 from James Slagle ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/agroup/tripleo-rpm-spec-files/master/tripleo-image-elements/openstack-tripleo-image-elements.spec
SRPM URL:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack-m/openstack-m/fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075254
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075254
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075031
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075035
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075254
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Jamie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075031
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Jamie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075035
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Jamie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075047
--- Comment #6 from Tom Hughes ---
So the second test failure I was seeing is because I was running mocha by hand,
while "npm test" applies a ulimit first, and the test in question is testing
what happens when it runs out of file descriptors s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075027
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075047
--- Comment #7 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Ok cool. connect@2.14.1 still passes the whole test suite with the current
multiparty package so fingers crossed we'll not see any strange problems.
When I find the energy I might open FPC tickets for node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075027
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075027
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075047
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075022
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075047
--- Comment #9 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/connect/nodejs-multiparty.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/connect/SRPMS/nodejs-multiparty-3.2.3-2.fc21.src.rpm
* Tue Mar 11 2014 Jamie Nguyen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075047
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Jamie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075027
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Jamie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075022
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075022
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074411
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Thanks for the input T.C.!
When I find the energy I'll open an FPC ticket. It's quite a popular module (as
of right now, 247 other modules list it as a dependency) so it would probably
be worth getting int
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074411
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Blocks|1074418
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074418
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1074411 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075022
--- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: nodejs-csurf
Short Description: CSRF token middleware for Node.js and Connect
Owners: jamielinux patches
Branches: f19 f20 el6
InitialCC:
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071495
--- Comment #2 from Will Benton ---
Fixes to work with sbt 0.13.1-5.
Spec URL: http://freevariable.com/spark/spark.spec
SRPM URL: http://freevariable.com/spark/spark-0.9.0-0.3.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070941
--- Comment #8 from Luis Bazan ---
Hi Julien
- add %check
%check
{__python2} -m unittest discover -s tests
- please give space in changelog
%changelog
* Fri Feb 28 2014 Julien Enselme - 1.1.3-2
- Add python3 support
- Improve packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068937
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|js-json-20140204git3d7767b- |js-json-20140204git3d7767b-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051915
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977123
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|nodejs-grunt-contrib-concat |nodejs-grunt-contrib-concat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062921
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|php-google-apiclient-1.0.3- |php-google-apiclient-1.0.3-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075277
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pwout...@redhat.com
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066629
--- Comment #15 from Pádraig Brady ---
I see all the binaries listed in comment #8
They really should be confined to /usr/libexec/openstack-tripleo
If they are to be exposed to a standard user shell then they
should be prefixed with somethin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074916
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #7 from Toshi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070946
--- Comment #2 from Julien Enselme ---
I have just re-uploaded the spec and the srpm. Now the two specs are the same.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066629
--- Comment #13 from James Slagle ---
(In reply to Steven Dake from comment #10)
> James,
>
> The loads of binaries in /usr/bin needs to be fixed. You have a couple
> options.
>
> 1) Prefix every binary with tripleo
That wouldn't be ideal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058196
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|php-goutte-1.0.5-1.fc20 |php-goutte-1.0.5-1.el6
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066027
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|csdiff-1.0.2-2.fc20 |csdiff-1.0.2-2.el6
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066629
Steven Dake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pbr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955996
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler ---
There are more and more non-upstream changes to Qt. This package is just not
maintainable. Shipping a fork of the entire Qt is just not acceptable, and
applying all those patches to the system Qt is not goin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075277
Paul Wouters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Paul Wout
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058195
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|php-gitter-0.2.0-2.20131206 |php-gitter-0.2.0-2.20131206
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075277
Bug ID: 1075277
Summary: Review Request: irma_configuration - IRMA Card
configuration data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610857
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955996
Jeff Fearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jfe...@redhat.com
--- Comment #7 from Jef
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955996
--- Comment #9 from Jeff Fearn ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #8)
> There are more and more non-upstream changes to Qt. This package is just not
> maintainable. Shipping a fork of the entire Qt is just not acceptable, and
> applying
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955996
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler ---
IMHO, a bundling exception for something as large as Qt is not realistic
either. How do you plan to maintain that fork?
I see only 3 possibilities (with the reservation that I am not the one to make
the de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955996
--- Comment #11 from Jeff Fearn ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #10)
> IMHO, a bundling exception for something as large as Qt is not realistic
> either. How do you plan to maintain that fork?
Upstream does most of that work. For se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013836
--- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski ---
This turns out to be an openmpi 1.7.4 change triggering this. openmpi 1.7.5
should fix some of this. Once that is released (soon), I'll patch scorep to
build against it.
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328
Ivan Romanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dr...@land.ru)|
--- Comment #74 from Ivan Romanov ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
Pete Travis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1075410
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
201 - 264 of 264 matches
Mail list logo