https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783016
--- Comment #35 from Andres Pascasio ---
Here's the new files, I have taken into account the opinion of Christopher Meng
New Spec URL: http://morpheusv.fedorapeople.org/pilas/0.80-8/pilas.spec
SRPM URL:
http://morpheusv.fedorapeople.org/pila
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071163
--- Comment #5 from Gerd Pokorra ---
- add use-readline option to Configure.pl
- add BuildRequires readline-devel and libtommath-devel
- exclude linenoise and libtommath header file
- add patch to link with libtommath from the system and use i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069453
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-nats-0.1.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-nats-0.1.2-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069453
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-nats-0.1.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-nats-0.1.2-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069453
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077392
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter ---
OK,
Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kde/kfilemetadata.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kde/kfilemetadata-4.12.90-2.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Mon Mar 17 2014 Rex Dieter 4.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066346
Bug 1066346 depends on bug 1059942, which changed state.
Bug 1059942 Summary: Review Request: ghc-network - Network library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024589
--- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Package looks OK.
The rpmlint warning is bogus: "reimplemented" is what is commonly used, and
"re-implemented" looks foreign.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036755
--- Comment #19 from Miro Hrončok ---
OK, would you share your works, so I can try it and see what I can do?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036755
--- Comment #18 from Jamie Lennox ---
The spec is more or less complete unfortunately the python 3 tests don't pass.
This doesn't seem to be something that is the packages fault but i think that
there is some deterministic test cases upstream.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075822
Jon Bernard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jobernar@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066657
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
python-summershum-0.1.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048815
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|RdRand-1.0.5-1.fc20 |RdRand-1.0.5-1.el6
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|libmediainfo-0.7.67-2.fc19 |libmediainfo-0.7.67-2.el6
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077392
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ---
A -libs subpackage strikes me as not very useful for this package, which is a
library. The plugins are best shipped together with the library; if a package
needs the 32-bit library, it also needs the 32-bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024589
--- Comment #11 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Hmmm. They would be useful to have. I'm not sure what the guidelines would say
about having the *.map in jsdir along with the rest of the minified javascript,
but since they are useful in the web browser t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077392
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1077394 (baloo-widgets)
Referenced Bugs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077393
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1077394 (baloo-widgets)
Referenced Bugs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077394
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077394
Bug ID: 1077394
Summary: Review Request: baloo-widgets - Widgets for Baloo
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077393
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077392
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1077393 (baloo)
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077393
Bug ID: 1077393
Summary: Review Request: baloo - A framework for searching and
managing metadata
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077392
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077392
Bug ID: 1077392
Summary: Review Request: kfilemetadata - A library for
extracting file metadata
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036230
--- Comment #2 from Eric Smith ---
Thanks for looking at this.
I'm not completely certain that I understand the "development symlink" comment.
I reported upstream, but my explanation may not be accurate:
https://github.com/ffainelli/faifa/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077322
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen ---
(In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #1)
> [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
>
> I don't think the web-assets-filesystem require is needed?
Indeed. Thanks!
> [!]: Rpmlint is run on all i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
omniORBpy-3.7-5.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/omniORBpy-3.7-5.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033975
--- Comment #2 from Eric Smith ---
Thanks for reviewing! Updated to latest upstream, and spec updated per your
comments:
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/python-enum34/python-enum34.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077322
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= Issues =
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
I do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692131
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manisan...@gmail.com
--- Comment #21 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Mat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024589
--- Comment #10 from Tom Hughes ---
Other than the rpmlint warning, my other question is whether we should be
packaging the .map files?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024589
--- Comment #9 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues
==
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
js-zlib.noa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052040
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla ---
fedora-review flag not set
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052040
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059805
--- Comment #2 from Robert Rati ---
FPC exception granted:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/392
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069257
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #19 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071653
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkund...@v3.sk
--- Comment #5 from L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052040
Mohammed Isam changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #21 from Moha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
--- Comment #36 from Pete Travis ---
Good cath, José, thanks! I've updated the files in place.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077268
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077268
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-astroML-addons-0.2.1-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-astroML-addons-0.2.1-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077322
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
Lars Kellogg-Stedman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077268
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077268
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077268
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024589
--- Comment #8 from Jamie Nguyen ---
(And in case it wasn't obvious, the symlink is so that we aren't building the
same source twice, which would seem less than ideal.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077322
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
Referenced Bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024589
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|977137 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077322
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||977137
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977137
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1024589 |1077322
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077322
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1024589
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024589
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1077322
--- Comment #7 from Jamie Nguy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077268
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071456
Bug 1071456 depends on bug 1065446, which changed state.
Bug 1065446 Summary: Review Request: hive - Hadoop-compatible data warehouse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065446
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065446
Pete MacKinnon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077322
Bug ID: 1077322
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-zlibjs - JavaScript library
reimplementing compression, made available for Node.js
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019948
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-astroML-0.2-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-astroML-0.2-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019948
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070946
--- Comment #3 from Julien Enselme ---
SimpleCV provides tests. I tried to add a %check macro.
But some tests are performed on non-free functionalities of OpenCV that are not
packaged in Fedora. So the tests are compelled to fail. So I won't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070941
--- Comment #21 from Julien Enselme ---
I have successfully created the new package request. Everything seems good to
me.
If I understand correctly the next steps of the process, I have to wait for the
package to be pushed in testing and then
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070941
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
python-svgwrite-1.1.3-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-svgwrite-1.1.3-4.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070941
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
python-svgwrite-1.1.3-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-svgwrite-1.1.3-4.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070941
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036755
--- Comment #17 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
Btw, even though is was originally a review swap with Miro, I'll continue the
review anyway. So feel free to take it, you'd still have a reviewer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077268
--- Comment #3 from Christian Dersch ---
Thank you very much for the fast review :) Following spec/srpm should fix the
issues.
Spec URL:
http://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-astroML/python-astroML-addons.spec
SRPM URL:
http://lupin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036755
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(jlen...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077301
Vitaly Kuznetsov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Reference
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077301
Bug ID: 1077301
Summary: Review Request: python-aaargh - An astonishingly
awesome application argument helper
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077268
--- Comment #2 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
Issues:
===
- Permissions on files are set properly.
Note: See rpmlint output
See: http://fedoraproject.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077295
Bug ID: 1077295
Summary: Review Request: perl-Exporter-Tiny - An exporter with
the features of Sub::Exporter but only core
dependencies
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076516
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065446
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065446
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019948
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019948
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077268
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019948
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1077268
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077268
Bug ID: 1077268
Summary: Review Request: python-astroML-addons - Performance
add-ons for the astroML package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065446
Pete MacKinnon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Pete
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019948
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=100
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1019948 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019948
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Blocks|177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019948
--- Comment #6 from Christian Dersch ---
Thank you for reviewing :) Pushed fixed spec/srpm
Spec URL:
http://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-astroML/python-astroML.spec
SRPM URL:
http://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-astroM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065446
Will Benton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863
--- Comment #11 from Luis Pabon ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #10)
> It's "Development/Libraries" here, too:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cmocka.git/plain/cmocka.spec
>
> The group of that base package is wrong and sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064576
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-freezegun-0.1.12-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-freezegun-0.1.12-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt ---
It's "Development/Libraries" here, too:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cmocka.git/plain/cmocka.spec
The group of that base package is wrong and should be "System
Environment/Libraries".
However,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863
--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt ---
> %files devel
> %{_includedir}/cmockery*
> %{_libdir}/libcmockery.so
> %exclude %{_libdir}/libcmockery.a
> %exclude %{_libdir}/libcmockery.la
The proper Group tag for such library -devel packages has
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081
--- Comment #8 from Jan Holcapek ---
(In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #7)
> 0.) Please package a more recent version.
>
> 4.3.0 seems already available.
I understand your concern, however, this is intentional: the reason why I
decide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057872
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077192
Bug ID: 1077192
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-API - Test a list of
subroutines provided by a module
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019948
--- Comment #5 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Created attachment 875488
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=875488&action=edit
improved spec-file
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #12 from Matthias Runge ---
(In reply to Lars Kellogg-Stedman from comment #11)
> This latest spec file seems to resolve all the directory ownership issues,
> but you still need to fix the quoting on your find statements (bottom of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076463
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt ---
D'oh!
> That would be usual.
typo: _unusual_
It would be unusual for rpmlint to issue a warning related to the versioning,
if the hardcoded %version is also used in the tarball.
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076840
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
