https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076840
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074651
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074651
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074418
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074418
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074268
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074268
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070941
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069453
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070941
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758
--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069453
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059942
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057872
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057872
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050805
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050805
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968603
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968603
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965095
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965095
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070946
Luis Bazan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.red
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069257
--- Comment #18 from Till Hofmann ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #17)
> They have chosen to patch it as well, but differently. They add an Autotools
> > based configure script and include a pkgconfig file in their -dev packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282
Adrien Devresse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|needinfo?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076463
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt ---
> I am surprised that rpmlint didn't catch this issue.
> Generally those error caught by rpmlint.
That would be usual. Why should it know?
| Version:%{commit}
| Release:1%{?dist}
| Sou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
--- Comment #7 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052040
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #20 from Petr Šabata ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069629
Stanislav Ochotnicky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||socho...@redhat.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075822
Flavio Percoco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment #4 is|1 |0
private|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075822
Flavio Percoco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jober...@redhat.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059803
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ade...@gmail.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845115
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|Stalled Reviewer|
--- Comment #18 from Bohus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081
--- Comment #6 from Jan Holcapek ---
(In reply to Jan Holcapek from comment #1)
> spread.src: W: file-size-mismatch spread-src-4.2.0.tar.gz = 736189,
> http://www.spread.org/download/spread-src-4.2.0.tar.gz = 2628
This is due to registration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081
--- Comment #5 from Jan Holcapek ---
Regargind the invalid-license warning: I've dropped a question to
le...@lists.fedoraproject.org asking whether Spread Open Source License is
suitable for a Fedora package.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024589
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Argh, wrong url:
Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/js-zlib.spec
SRPM URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/js-zlib-0.2.0-3.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024589
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Tom, sorry for the slow response. I think that the naming proposed by Jamie is
OK: nodejs-zlibjs and js-zlib. The tarball is called zlibjs, so even upstream
seems to skip the dot.
Jamie, tha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081
--- Comment #4 from Jan Holcapek ---
$ rpmlint spread-static-4.2.0-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm
spread-static.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
spread-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081
--- Comment #3 from Jan Holcapek ---
$ rpmlint spread-devel-4.2.0-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm
spread-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on spread/spread-libs/libspread
spread-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
spread-devel.x86_64: W
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081
--- Comment #1 from Jan Holcapek ---
$ rpmlint spread-4.2.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
spread.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Spread
spread.src: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
spread.src: W: file-size-mismatch spread-src-4.2.0.tar.gz = 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081
--- Comment #2 from Jan Holcapek ---
$ rpmlint spread-4.2.0-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm
spread.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Spread
spread.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
spread.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary flush_us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081
Bug ID: 1077081
Summary: Review Request: spread - cluster messaging toolkit
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076463
--- Comment #4 from Praveen Kumar ---
Thanks Meng for pointing version tag issue, I am surprised that rpmlint didn't
catch this issue. Generally those error caught by rpmlint.
for snapshot capture version tag:-
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075595
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|999011 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.
101 - 147 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
