https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047788
Leon Weber l...@leonweber.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|l...@leonweber.de |nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047788
Leon Weber l...@leonweber.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726
--- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #4)
I only have one question about the license - It is my understanding that
license not provided by upstream cannot be included.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999047
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962836
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962839
Bug 962839 depends on bug 962836, which changed state.
Bug 962836 Summary: Review Request: beanvalidation-tck - Bean Validation (JSR
349) TCK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962836
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962836
Bug 962836 depends on bug 962838, which changed state.
Bug 962838 Summary: Review Request: jboss-test-audit - Test Audit Utils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962838
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962838
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081966
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
(In reply to David Dick from comment #1)
Package built ok for rawhide only at
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6685344
FIX
BR: Moose::Conflicts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726
--- Comment #7 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #6)
Is this (unresponsive/unable, etc.) the case or would you prefer to wait a
couple of days for upstream to (potentially) add the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726
Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081434
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078588
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Consider pointing the fedora-review tool at this ticket,
fedora-review -b 1078588
since it performs many helpful checks (it takes the package from the Spec/SRPM
URLs).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894594
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080498
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000799
--- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info ---
Christopher thank you for take review, but it is really not ready yet (you have
cler that flag). By provided link you may find hot and interesting discussing
about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726
--- Comment #9 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Thanks Mukundan!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081966
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081966
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977638
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-espeak-0.5-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-espeak-0.5-7.el6
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075218
--- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
License: GPLv3
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#NoticeInSourceFile
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
These scriptlets are not needed, because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965095
Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058094
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074651
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
From the koji build log I saw this:
checking for doxygen... no
configure: WARNING: doxygen not found - documentation targets will be skipped
WIll you consider adding BR doxygen and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998483
--- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
0.2.3.1 is out. I will review this once you update the package.
I hope you can create a new bug and mark this as duplicate of the one you
create.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #24 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
1. F20+ has solved this bug, you can drop these:
# we don't want to provide private python extension libs, snippet from:
#
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994859
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994859
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079484
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080669
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081026
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Koji built fine.
License file issued upstream.
Spelling errors cleaned.
Once addressed over, I will post new SPEC + SRPM here again.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079618
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
34 matches
Mail list logo