https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076186
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from David Ki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057911
--- Comment #3 from Ivan Romanov ---
Try this
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{mingw32_prefix} | grep -e ".dll\$" | sed
s@"^$RPM_BUILD_ROOT"@"%%exclude "@ | sed s/".dll\$"/".dll.debug"/ >
mingw32-qt5-%{qt_module}.excludes
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{mingw64_p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057911
Ivan Romanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dr...@land.ru
--- Comment #2 from Ivan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091659
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
1. Summary suggestion:
C/C++ source files #include analyzer based on clang
2. %{_bindir}/fix_includes.py
Maybe you can rename it to %{_bindir}/fix_includes? I think this name is
shorter :)
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860146
Vinzenz Feenstra [evilissimo] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091659
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097089
Jan Kaluža changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Jan Kalu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094581
--- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Hi Sam,
Any updates on reviewing other people packages??
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076186
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086044
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@fedoraproject.org
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075605
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen ---
I can update this I am happy to review. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075598
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Je
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098854
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098854
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6861883
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098854
Bug ID: 1098854
Summary: Review Request: pandoc-citeproc - Citeproc support for
pandoc
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen ---
Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-hint/ghc-hint.spec
SRPM:
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-hint/ghc-hint-0.4.2.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
Scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454208
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
Flags|fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094041
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094041
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-inlinestyler-0.1.7-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-inlinestyler-0.1.7-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085030
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-openshift-go- |golang-github-openshift-go-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096188
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-ngram-3.3.0-1.fc20 |python-ngram-3.3.0-1.fc19
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093186
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
puppet-gluster-0.0.3-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087401
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093407
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||guayadeque-0.3.7-2.svn1893.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070549
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|tintii-2.8.2-1.fc19 |tintii-2.8.2-1.fc20
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070549
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096188
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098820
Bug ID: 1098820
Summary: Review Request: idfpml - Intel Decimal Floating-Point
Math Library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089409
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nonamed...@gmail.com
Assig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089409
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098700
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098700
--- Comment #2 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026252
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|volke...@gmx.at
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089425
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from David
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089500
--- Comment #14 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
I guess we're going to have to package openlibm without tests enabled for now.
I'll uncomment the relevant lines when upstream has had a chance to fix it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098807
--- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko ---
CC'ed Ankur Sinha, because he is maintainer of python-liblarch.
FYI, upstream no longer support py2/gtk2 of liblarch. Therefore I'm submitting
this package. I think we could retire in the near future py2-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098807
Bug ID: 1098807
Summary: Review Request: python3-liblarch - Data structures
helper library for python3
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089425
--- Comment #4 from Peter Oliver ---
Spec URL: http://mavit.fedorapeople.org/rpm/keepass.spec
SRPM URL: http://mavit.fedorapeople.org/rpm/keepass-2.26-4.fc19.src.rpm
- The licence is included in the file
/usr/share/doc/keepass/Chm/help/v2/lic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057766
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #26 from M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210323
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-DesktopEntry-0.08-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210322
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-MimeInfo-0.25-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055366
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098625
--- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) ---
Reason looks good for me. So, if you "feel that you have a good reason to own a
file or directory that another package owns" and guidelines give us such
possibility - let it be.
Only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057766
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #25 from Kev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058587
--- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #14)
> (In reply to Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #12)
> > > (In repl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087772
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Remi Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098625
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet ---
(In reply to Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) from comment #4)
> > So this seems a copy/paste/cleanup minor error.
> > So I think correct License is really LGPLv2.
> >
> > But we can wait a little for ups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825409
--- Comment #33 from Rich Mattes ---
Thanks for the review Scott. I've replied to your notes inline
(In reply to Scott K Logan from comment #32)
> Okay, I've completed the package review. This is a MASSIVE package, and I
> applaud your effort
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058587
--- Comment #14 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) from comment #13)
> (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) from comment #10)
> > Yes, becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866265
--- Comment #28 from Michael Schwendt ---
Spotting issues or oddities often is the easy part during review. ;) Fixing
them may be more difficult.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087772
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087769
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098625
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098625
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) ---
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #3)
> (In reply to Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) from comment #1)
> > 1)
> > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058587
--- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #12)
> (In reply to Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) from comment #10)
> Yes, because you are deleting source files. These files have no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098778
--- Comment #1 from David Dick ---
koji builds at
rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6860777
el6 at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6860771
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098778
Bug ID: 1098778
Summary: Review Request: perl-Redis - Perl binding for Redis
database
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088696
--- Comment #5 from José Matos ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #4)
> Thanks for the review. I'll add COPYING to %doc.
Glad to be of help. If you have other octave packages reviews place me in the
cc and I will do the review.
T
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076186
--- Comment #5 from David King ---
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #4)
>…
> Please inform upstream of the wrong address.
Sadly, upstream is no longer maintaining OpenSTV as Free Software. This is the
last version using the
59 matches
Mail list logo