https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075595
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|ghc-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075595
--- Comment #7 from Ricky Elrod ---
Spec URL:
http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/ghc-transformers-compat/ghc-transformers-compat.spec
SRPM URL:
http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/ghc-transformers-compat/ghc-transformers-compat-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097985
Daiki Ueno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Daiki Ue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075595
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen ---
The best way to enable the three flag is to use run:
cabal-tweak-flag three True
in %prep. Failing that patching is also okay, but using cabal-tweak-flag
is much easier to maintain.
(What I said on i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112072
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible lice
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075598
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-contravariant-0.5.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-contravariant-0.5.2-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075598
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-contravariant-0.5.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-contravariant-0.5.2-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075598
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058628
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||Ready
--- Comment #1 from Christop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114187
--- Comment #2 from Robin Lee ---
Spec URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/python-shadowsocks.spec
SRPM URL:
http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/python-shadowsocks-2.0.8-2.fc20.src.rpm
2.0.8-2 Change:
- Explicitly use python2 macros
(In rep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001452
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001452
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091483
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047647
--- Comment #13 from Denis Fateyev ---
Any changes here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116653
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from De
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116653
--- Comment #4 from Denis Fateyev ---
> we want to apply Fedora CFLAGS for make.
I got it looking at the koji build. I patched all CFLAGS options in spec, it
gave me the same result. Anyway, not so important when it works. And with
`configure`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116653
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #2)
> Funny, I've just finished package for it, too ;-)
:-)
> One question: what's the reason to create bogus configure script and run it?
we want to apply Fedora CF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116653
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116653
--- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko ---
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7110365
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116653
Bug ID: 1116653
Summary: Review Request: abduco - Session management in a clean
and simple way
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114696
--- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Only one issue -
repo_manager.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/repo_manager/__init__.py 0644L /usr/bin/env
---> This needs to be fixed.
Package Review
===
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116517
David Tardon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtar...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116517
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116517
David Tardon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1116641
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116625
Bug ID: 1116625
Summary: Review Request: mp3unicode - Convert MP3 tags to
Unicode
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957715
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|Ready
--- Comment #6 from Christoph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
Han Frederic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1104802 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #30 from Han Frederic ---
Thank you,
so I have remove these lines.
http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~han/fedora/1083941/comment30/giac.spec
The 1.1.1 tests have been updated with the legal pari syntax so the pari crash
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #18)
> (In reply to nucleo from comment #17)
> > Can you describe what should be done?
>
> add:
> # The version is used from src/md5.c line:
> # /* $Id: md5.c,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744
nucleo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1116582
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #29 from Christopher Meng ---
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128/mimetypes
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
--- Comment #28 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #27 from Han Frederic ---
I have updated to giac 1.1.1 version (current stable) and cleanup the giac.spec
accordingly.
Also add a new dependency because of some new features in 1.1.1
http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~han/fedora/1083941
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116548
--- Comment #4 from David Nichols ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3)
> (In reply to David Nichols from comment #2)
> > from a review of the spec file:
> >
> > in %setup
> > sed -i -e 's|-s|%{?__global_ldflags}|g' \
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116548
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to David Nichols from comment #2)
> an informal review:
>
> from rpmlint:
>
> g800.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US programme ->
> programmer, programmed, program me
>
> http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691
--- Comment #27 from David Nichols ---
I did my first informal review here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116548#c2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116548
David Nichols changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||da...@qore.org
--- Comment #2 from Da
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116560
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to David Nichols from comment #2)
> Theres something wrong with the SRPM:
>
> cpio: premature end of file
> WARNING: Cannot unpack
> /export/home/dnichols/fr/shelxle-1.0.663-1.fc21.src.rpm in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115049
Florian "der-flo" Lehner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116560
David Nichols changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||da...@qore.org
--- Comment #2 from Da
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116560
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Comment #1 from Chris
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116560
Bug ID: 1116560
Summary: Review Request: shelxle - Qt graphical user interface
for SHELXL
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: med
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116552
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt ---
> I do check my script everytime,
A guard in the spec file (such as a well-crafted grep match) would automate
that task during version upgrades.
You'll burn your hands sooner or later, if you miss a s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028206
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|m...@zarb.org |nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116552
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #1)
> As much as you may like "sed -i …" based substitutions in files, be aware
> that this road is not a safe one. If the match fails, nothing gets
> substitu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116552
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt ---
As much as you may like "sed -i …" based substitutions in files, be aware that
this road is not a safe one. If the match fails, nothing gets substituted.
Using patches is to be preferred, unless you add
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116552
Bug ID: 1116552
Summary: Review Request: ustl - A size-optimized STL
implementation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
47 matches
Mail list logo
