https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114187
Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091216
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119986
Bug ID: 1119986
Summary: EPEL7 branch couchdb
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: wtog...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977646
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098480
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062911
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|srcpd-2.1.2-4.el5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062911
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119095
--- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name ---
Hi Brian,
Some notes regarding your latest revision -- the spec you link to is not the
spec used to build the SRPM, there's a typo in the latter.
Also you're using both
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119095
--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name ---
Full review -- there are several more issues
Summary:
- documentation probably should be split (end users don't need them)
- you should run the tests that upstream provide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062942
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081
--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name ---
Reviewing now; while I'm at it, the license field should probably be changed to
just LGPLv2 ?
Here are the commit logs for that file on Github:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098854
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098854
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pandoc-citeproc-0.3.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pandoc-citeproc-0.3.1-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075605
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Latest is 0.4.4.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081
--- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name ---
Apart from the license, there are a couple more issues:
- duplicate ocaml(runtime) and ocaml-runtime in Requires: -- the manually added
requirement is probably unnecessary?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062942
--- Comment #12 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
Created attachment 918315
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918315action=edit
Proposed perl-App-CSV.spec
To get you started, attached is a perl-App-CSV.spec, how I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030755
Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(m...@petetravis.com |
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo