https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120299
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
Bug ID: 1127091
Summary: Review Request: perl-PerlIO-buffersize - Set the
buffersize of a handle
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
--- Comment #1 from Jan Holcapek holca...@gmail.com ---
Additional note: the reason why there is a patch that avoids (build) dependency
to PerlIO::Layers (dont-use-perlio-layers.patch) is quite simple: because this
module were not used
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Are you going to package it for EL5?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
--- Comment #3 from Jan Holcapek holca...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #2)
Are you going to package it for EL5?
No (unless someone would be interested in having this package in EPEL 5).
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456
--- Comment #14 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
I still see value as using Fedora rpm packages.
For one, this is properly integrated with the whole ecosystem ( ie, integrated
in kickstart, ansible/puppet/chef, satelite ). While you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Fine.
Transient SPEC review:
1. Drop these:
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125945
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125945
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
--- Comment #5 from Jan Holcapek holca...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #4)
Fine.
Transient SPEC review:
1. Drop these:
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u}
-n)
rm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123583
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125225
--- Comment #4 from Tomas Tomecek ttome...@redhat.com ---
I have updated the srpm and spec file. Correct links:
Spec URL: https://ttomecek.fedorapeople.org/alot-0.3.6/alot.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkund...@v3.sk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123399
--- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk ---
I'm wondering if you're expecting me to update the package at this point? I
can't do that as the package is supposed to build in releases f21; the patch
can surely be removed in future
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125225
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|i...@cicku.me |
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
--- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk ---
You should consider upstreaming the patch, or adding a comment clarifying why
isn't the patch upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123583
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
Jan Holcapek holca...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841
--- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
What about that bundled xmlrpc++? Is it approved by FESCo?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102950
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123401
--- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk ---
SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/python-scraperwiki.spec
SRPM:
http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/python-scraperwiki-0.3.11-2.el7.centos.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126990
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|20 |rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102950
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
Daniel E. Wilson d...@bureau-13.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(d...@bureau-13.or |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126940
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126940
--- Comment #1 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
Correct License is ASL 2.0
0.50 has been released in the last 24 hours. Do you want to use that instead?
I'm happy to review either version.
examples can be added to %doc
Following BRs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123400
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123400
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127169
Bug ID: 1127169
Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Reporter - Adds CPAN Testers
reporting to CPAN.pm
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127169
--- Comment #1 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
koji builds
rawhide at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7247220
f20 at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7247243
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127173
Bug ID: 1127173
Summary: Review Request: liborigin2 - Library for reading
OriginLab OPJ project files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127173
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126940
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr ---
(In reply to David Dick from comment #1)
Correct License is ASL 2.0
One day, I'll get this right...
0.50 has been released in the last 24 hours. Do you want to use that
instead?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125222
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123583
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127190
Bug ID: 1127190
Summary: Review Request: rhash - Computing hash sums and
creating magnet links
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126940
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123400
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PerlIO-buffersize-0.001-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PerlIO-buffersize-0.001-1.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PerlIO-buffersize-0.001-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PerlIO-buffersize-0.001-1.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123400
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Misformatted, no owner(s) specified.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123400
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123583
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123583
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125222
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
NOTE: Misformatted request.
WARNING: No new branches requested.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125222
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126796
Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127212
Bug ID: 1127212
Summary: Review Request: python-oslo-utils - OpenStack Oslo
Utility library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127212
Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127212
--- Comment #1 from Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com ---
Review upcoming, meanwhile, successful koji scratch build result:
-
$ koji build --scratch rawhide python-oslo-utils-0.1.1-1.fc22.src.rpm
Uploading srpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126990
--- Comment #4 from Brent Baude bba...@redhat.com ---
My FAS id is 'baude'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127091
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PerlIO-buffersize-0.001-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PerlIO-buffersize-0.001-1.el6
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126990
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125222
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125222
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Complete.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125222
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841
--- Comment #12 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #11)
What about that bundled xmlrpc++? Is it approved by FESCo?
I think this is in the grey area because:
1. Upstream is dead (last update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060841
--- Comment #13 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Here our guidelines seem to conflict a bit but from this page[1]:
Packages which contain bundled libraries (bundled libraries being defined as
libraries which exist and are maintained
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126617
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkund...@v3.sk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126617
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126622
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126620
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116142
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-require_all-1.3.2-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-require_all-1.3.2-4.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116142
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126940
Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126623
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123400
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121084
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120982
--- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net ---
The description says:
[...] We
provide ease of use through three primary mechanisms:
(1)Operator and function over-loading.
(2)Numerous pre-fabricated utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127324
Bug ID: 1127324
Summary: Review Request: librasterlite2 - Stores and retrieves
huge raster coverages using a SpatiaLite DBMS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdaw...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdaw...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125225
--- Comment #6 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624490
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdaw...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdaw...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdaw...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553908
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdaw...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122996
--- Comment #2 from Steve Linabery slina...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
https://slinabery.fedorapeople.org/openstack-tempest/openstack-tempest.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125953
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674587
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdaw...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102950
--- Comment #8 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
Thank you very much for the review, Nikos.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102950
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122996
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378
--- Comment #41 from Shawn Starr shawn.st...@rogers.com ---
alternatives might be a good idea, we do use it for configuration not just
DSOs, executables.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361191
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdaw...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716469
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdaw...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361191
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361191
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428
--- Comment #39 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo