https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125225
Tomas Tomecek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Toma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125225
--- Comment #9 from Tomas Tomecek ---
Flo, thank you for doing the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128366
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
1. 1.4.55(japanese version page) is out.
2. Can't "make check" work?
3. I'm not sure if --enable-longlong is needed on 64 bits arch, you'd better
drop an email to the upstream.
4. WRONG:
%package do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128373
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng ---
1. Missing BRs of module itself:
perl(Carp)
perl(Class::Struct)
perl(IO::File)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
2. Missing BR of tests:
perl(File::Basename)
3. Drop this in the SPEC:
find $RPM_BUILD_ROO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128373
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128366
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960645
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302
--- Comment #82 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Tristan Matthews from comment #81)
> FYI, ilbc is already packaged for Fedora:
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ilbc
Thanks. Then I think ilbc in Fedora needs an update maybe.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128378
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng ---
1. Please, unset %global _hardened_build 1, I don't know why you prefer adding
this to all packages.
2. LDFLAGS still not set:
cc -Wall cv.o sizes.o hlist.o -o cv -lncurses -lm
In your spec:
LDFLAGS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302
--- Comment #81 from Tristan Matthews ---
FYI, ilbc is already packaged for Fedora:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ilbc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302
--- Comment #80 from Christopher Meng ---
Notes:
I've seen ilbc in many opensource projects, chromium, freeswitch. As ilbc is
part of webrtc now, I still can download it from the original homepage:
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/voipcod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302
--- Comment #79 from Sandro Mani ---
Reading through the above I see that unbundling the ilbc is simply a matter of
hacking the build scripts. This seems to be feasible, I'll try to post a patch
by tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pa...@hubbitus.info |manisan...@gmail.com
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302
--- Comment #78 from Sandro Mani ---
Created attachment 925597
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=925597&action=edit
licensecheck
I'll take over the review if no-one minds.
- Group unnecessary
- lconfig on devel unnecessary
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128480
--- Comment #1 from Matej Stuchlik ---
Spec URL: https://mstuchli.fedorapeople.org/python-pipsi.spec
SRPM URL: https://mstuchli.fedorapeople.org/python-pipsi-0.4-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128480
Bug ID: 1128480
Summary: Review Request: python-pipsi - Wraps pip and
virtualenv to install scripts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
--- Comment #34 from Antonio Trande ---
Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/Icecat/icecat.spec
SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/Icecat/icecat-24.0-12.fc20.src.rpm
HTTPS-everywhere and RequestPolicy are not packaged in Icecat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
--- Comment #4 from Scott K Logan ---
Christopher -
Thanks for the feedback.
(1) and (2) have been fixed as described.
For (3), I assume you were looking for the -devel package to depend on the
base. I added that.
For (0), I'm sorry to rep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=388
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
gmsh-2.8.5-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmsh-2.8.5-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
engrid-1.4.0-3.gite6d55f5.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/engrid-1.4.0-3.gite6d55f5.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128378
--- Comment #8 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
ok - here we are again.
I hope I have understood you and implemented the points correctly.
Spec URL: https://flo.fedorapeople.org/cv.spec
SRPM URL: https://flo.fedorapeople.org/cv-0.4.1-3.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197565
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128393
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani ---
I see. I guess [1] would be an alternative, though Qt5 only. Is there somewhere
where one can follow the upstream discussion?
[1] https://github.com/Dax89/QHexEdit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128378
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
If you don't use my patch, simply hack from command line won't work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128378
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #4)
> 2. Passing LDFLAGS is not required.
> => Remove LDFLAGS+="%{?__global_ldflags}"
No. It's linked against ncurses. It's a MUST.
(In reply to Florian "der-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||niveusl...@niveusluna.org
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961223
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kalevlem...@gmail.com
--- Comment #19 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128378
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128378
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #4 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128366
--- Comment #2 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
Spec URL: https://flo.fedorapeople.org/lis.spec
SRPM URL: https://flo.fedorapeople.org/lis-1.4.53-2.fc20.src.rpm
koji-Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7269578
* Sun Aug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128378
--- Comment #3 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
hi!
Thanks for assigning!
I know there is a patch merged already for a manpage. But it's not part of the
current stable version. I am quite sure there will be a new release containing
this man
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
--- Comment #6 from Yajo ---
(In reply to T.C. Hollingsworth from comment #4)
> In the meantime, see if you can get going with koji. Also, try giving a few
> other packages an informal review:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
> How_to_get_sp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077301
Yajo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yajo@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Yajo -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127720
David Dick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1123336
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123336
David Dick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1127720
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128409
David Dick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1126598 |1124313
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124313
David Dick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1128409
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128409
David Dick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1126598
--- Comment #1 from David Dick
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128409
Bug ID: 1128409
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Data - Introspect context
information about modules in @INC
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128145
David Dick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from David Di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128145
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
42 matches
Mail list logo