https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131825
Bug ID: 1131825
Summary: Review Request: qtile - Small, flexible, scriptable
tiling window manager
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127169
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126046
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev...@gunduz.org,
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104291
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122777
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121601
--- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Bill McGonigle from comment #7)
> Just in case anybody runs into this, my install of 4.0.21 has a problem
> working with Pg - mysql code paths are called in some cases (reason
> currently unk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122777
--- Comment #2 from Paul Wouters ---
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/tcpcrypt/tcpcrypt.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/tcpcrypt/tcpcrypt-0-2.cacd9789.fc19.src.rpm
* Wed Aug 20 2014 Paul Wouters - 0-2.cacd9789
- Updated to latest git, remove
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123511
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114737
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng ---
Ok.
I think that my server(multiple VMs isolated in KVM) should be tweaked to
allocate more memory for the review, because linking is a memory intensive job.
Looks like I have to use my another powerf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130097
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Permissions on files are set properly.
Note: See rpmlint output
See: htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131284
--- Comment #7 from Michael Catanzaro ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #6)
> The last one is the ANGLE project which, in my understanding, is not meant
> to be a separate project and is just copied between chromium and webkit.
> Don'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #13 from John Zaitseff ---
Unfortunately, I have not heard anything from Jason Tibbitts since 2012. His
comments have certainly been helpful, but I'm wondering whether he is MIA.
Could someone else be reassigned this bug?
I have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131731
Bug ID: 1131731
Summary: Review Request: php-pimple - A simple dependency
injection container for PHP
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118528
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski ---
COPR builds:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/siwinski/php-experimental/build/24093/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118528
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: php-ctwig - |Review Request: php-twig -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130674
--- Comment #6 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
(In reply to Florian "der-flo" Lehner from comment #5)
> [!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
> Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131284
Michael Catanzaro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126459
Michael Catanzaro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986712
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #17 from Eric Smi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240
--- Comment #9 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
I actually got time again to do a new run on this package. Upstream has
released a new version, but the old homepage is down, so I got the source from
github.
In this version, the license is fixed upstre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130674
--- Comment #5 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not conta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129677
--- Comment #11 from Stefan Ringel ---
new specs and srpm:
Spec URL: http://stefanringel.de/pub/gstreamer1-rtsp-server.spec
SRPM URL:
http://stefanringel.de/pub/gstreamer1-rtsp-server-1.4.0-2.fc22.src.rpm
rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130674
--- Comment #4 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
Spec URL: https://mayorga.fedorapeople.org/python-pyo.spec
SRPM URL: https://mayorga.fedorapeople.org/python-pyo-0.6.9-3.fc20.src.rpm
* Tue Aug 19 2014 Eduardo Mayorga Téllez - 0.6.9-3
- Removing dupli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131284
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131309
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
All looks fine except that there is no license text, so you will need to add it
and ask upstream to add it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131309
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060920
--- Comment #18 from Jiri Kastner ---
seems development moved here:
http://structure.io/openni
and git is here
https://github.com/occipital/openni2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060920
Bug 1060920 depends on bug 1094787, which changed state.
Bug 1094787 Summary: kinect drivers path for openni
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094787
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131309
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129889
--- Comment #3 from Adam Miller ---
Sorry, wrong SRPM in previous comment.
Spec URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/fig.spec
SRPM URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/fig-0.5.2-1.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126459
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126459
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924350
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924350
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924350
Wolfgang Ulbrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924350
Wolfgang Ulbrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129889
--- Comment #2 from Adam Miller ---
1) Removed.
2) Removed.
3) Fixed.
4) It's a dep on docker.io (docker-io package), it's x86_64-only which is what
fig exists to orchestrate so I didn't think it made sense to have fig
build/install on othe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #5 from Denis Fateyev ---
All done, the updated spec:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora20/testing/yadifa.spec
Koji scratch builds:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7427953 (Rawhide)
https://koji.fedoraproject.o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071554
--- Comment #14 from Erik Schilling ---
Builds are running now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129677
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt ---
$ rpm -qpR gstreamer1-rtsp-server-devel-1.4.0-2.fc21.x86_64.rpm |grep pkg
/usr/bin/pkg-config
pkgconfig
pkgconfig(gstreamer-1.0)
pkgconfig(gstreamer-1.0)
pkgconfig(gstreamer-base-1.0)
pkgconfig(gstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130674
--- Comment #3 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or pyt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
--- Comment #40 from Denis Fateyev ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #39)
> (In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #38)
> > --
> > Notes:
> ...
> >
> > 3) If system xulrunner can be used here, we can put "Provides:
> > bundled
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130617
Florian "der-flo" Lehner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113310
--- Comment #19 from Erik Johnson ---
Sorry, it is now fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302
--- Comment #86 from Thomas Spura ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #85)
> My view is that Jared Smith has taken over the packaging effort, and
> requested help for unbundling ilbc in comment 67. And I would be the
> reviewer.
He shoul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://copr-fe.cloud.fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
--- Comment #39 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #38)
> --
> Notes:
...
>
> 3) If system xulrunner can be used here, we can put "Provides:
> bundled(xulrunner)" into conditionals since it won't be really bun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209
--- Comment #18 from Rex Dieter ---
the OpenSDP variant looks close to "BSD with attribution" variant. so, maybe
we can go with that for now, and use:
5. License: (BSD with attribution) and OpenSSL
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128393
--- Comment #3 from Sandro Mani ---
Hi Christopher,
What do you think about continuing with this regardless of the qhexedit
situation? I think the sqlitemanager is a really nice tool to have, and
personally I'm not overly concerned about the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079745
--- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius ---
Sorry, it took so long to return to this review. I have been on vacation which
had caused this review to drop off my personal radar.
APPROVED.
One remark: The "Requires: perl(Spreadsheet::WriteExcel) >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209
--- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter ---
3. SHOULD drop unused
BuildRequires: automake
I don't see this actually needed or used anywhere.
If you're going to be installing stuff by hand...
4. SHOULD use 'install -p' flag to preserve timestamps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991753
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el5
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991753
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209
--- Comment #16 from Rex Dieter ---
and trying an initial build, I see
...
gcc -Wall -O-c -o sscep.o sscep.c
...
2. $RPM_OPT_FLAGS MUST be used (or rationale given why not),
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packagi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209
--- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter ---
Initially,
1. SourceURL MUST be fixed
Source: %{name}.tar.gz
MUST be a full URL, or instructions provided on how to reproducibly create the
source tarball, see also:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packagi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131616
Bug ID: 1131616
Summary: Review Request: python-copr-client - Python client to
access copr service
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113310
--- Comment #18 from Sergio Pascual ---
This link is broken
http://terminalmage.net/redhat/python-libnacl/python-libnacl-1.3.2-1.el6.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104291
--- Comment #5 from Jerry James ---
Christopher: ping.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131423
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131423
--- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #5)
> How is this different from the existing ocaml-menhir package?
Am I gonna look stupid here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131423
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||loganje...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126459
Michael Catanzaro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126459
--- Comment #13 from Michael Catanzaro ---
Thanks Jon, sorry about that!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209
--- Comment #13 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Ah you did update the package once. I missed that comment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126459
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
WARNING: "Catanzaro" is not a valid FAS account.
WARNING: Invalid branch f22 requested
f22 is master/devel and is automatic.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126459
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131423
François Cami changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||f...@fcami.net
Assignee|nob..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128384
Adam Samalik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asama...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
--- Comment #38 from Denis Fateyev ---
Updated review for "icecat-24.0-12".
Koji rawhide build is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7413668 , everyone involved
is encouraged to look through, make some tests and give fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071554
--- Comment #13 from Erik Schilling ---
I sadly have a lot less time than expected. Also I wanted to sync this with the
flare package update. I already made all changes and in theory only need to
push. I hope I will be able to do a final test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126459
Michael Catanzaro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: libqqwing - |Review Request: qqwing -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129677
--- Comment #9 from Stefan Ringel ---
new specs and srpm:
Spec URL: http://stefanringel.de/pub/gstreamer1-rtsp-server.spec
SRPM URL:
http://stefanringel.de/pub/gstreamer1-rtsp-server-1.4.0-2.fc22.src.rpm
rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkab...@redhat.com
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253
--- Comment #14 from Kashyap Chamarthy ---
Addressed Dan's concern,removed the needless circular dependency of "Requires:
gerrymander".
Updated:
SPEC - https://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/spec-files/gerrymander.spec
SRPM - https://kashyapc.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543
--- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7427397
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543
Bug ID: 1131543
Summary: Review Request: python-flask-xml-rpc - Adds support
for creating XML-RPC APIs to Flask
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082656
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082656
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-diff-cover-0.6.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-diff-cover-0.6.0-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253
--- Comment #13 from Daniel Berrange ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #12)
> I don't remember any package that pulls its python2 and python3 subpackage
> for main package. Does anyone knows any such example in Fedora?
It is totall
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253
--- Comment #12 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
I don't remember any package that pulls its python2 and python3 subpackage for
main package. Does anyone knows any such example in Fedora?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253
--- Comment #11 from Daniel Berrange ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #10)
> so I can use gerrymander without installing python2-gerrymander and
> python3-gerrymander?
>
> I installed gerrymander only and tried to run gerrymander
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253
--- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
so I can use gerrymander without installing python2-gerrymander and
python3-gerrymander?
I installed gerrymander only and tried to run gerrymander
$ gerrymander
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129677
--- Comment #8 from Stefan Ringel ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #7)
>
> > Group: Development/Libraries
> > License:LGPLv2+
> > Requires: pkgconfig
>
> Automatic these days, provided that the package c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Berrange ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #6)
> Fix this
>
> 2) Add Requires: gerrymander to both subpackages
That makes no sense. The subpackages exist precisely so the modules can be
installed on thei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253
--- Comment #7 from Kashyap Chamarthy ---
Thanks a lot to Parag for your comments and help on IRC.
New SPEC and SRPM with some more changes with updated files section correctly
and add correct "Requires".
SPEC: https://kashyapc.fedorapeople
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|v850|All
--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(परा
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071163
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
--- Comment #25 from Dan Ho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130756
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130756
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130755
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130755
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082656
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082656
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225910
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225910
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253
Kashyap Chamarthy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|All |v850
--- Comment #5 from Kashyap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114737
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #2)
> Hello, it seems that this package is pretty large and complex... I spent 5
> hrs on my old laptop and the review still can't be performed, then I used my
>
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
