https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #55 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ua1hj7yv1mll9j3/nuvolaplayer.spec?dl=0
SRPM URL:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/86ge8s5u38nlgi8/nuvolaplayer-2.4.2-2.fc20.src.rpm?dl=0
%changelog
* Fri Aug 29
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701866
--- Comment #11 from Theodore Lee theo...@gmail.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: php-pecl-yaml
New Branches: el6 epel7
Owners: remi
InitialCC: antiaircraft
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701866
Theodore Lee theo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jstri...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127173
--- Comment #3 from Christian Dersch chrisder...@gmail.com ---
Oh yes, thank you :) Will be fixed soon, but I'm still waiting for a detailed
review...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135386
Bug ID: 1135386
Summary: Review Request: koschei - Continuous integration for
Fedora packages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135411
Bug ID: 1135411
Summary: Review Request: python-XStatic-Angular-Cookies -
Angular-Cookies (XStatic packaging standard)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135411
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1134565
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135413
Bug ID: 1135413
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-celluloid - Actor-based
concurrent object framework for Ruby
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135413
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135424
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1134565
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135424
Bug ID: 1135424
Summary: Review Request: python-XStatic-JSEncrypt - JSEncrypt
(XStatic packaging standard)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #2 from David Parsons david.pars...@inria.fr ---
Thank you Pierre-Yves
I have applied your suggestions except for the last once since I indeed intend
to package for EPEL as well.
Here's the new SPEC and SRPM files :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135430
Bug ID: 1135430
Summary: Review Request: python-XStatic-jquery-ui - jquery-ui
(XStatic packaging standard)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135430
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1134565
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
Incrementing the release number was good, replacing the entry for 2.2.1-1 in
the changelog not :)
The changelog contains a description of the changes that occurred to the spec
file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #4 from David Parsons david.pars...@inria.fr ---
Yes, I should have seen that. Well, here come v3 then...
http://parsons.eu/tmp/kissplice.spec
http://parsons.eu/tmp/kissplice-2.2.1-3.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134742
--- Comment #2 from Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com ---
Human review upcoming, meanwhile, `fedora-review` tool output for the record:
`fedora-review` results
===
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135413
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1134835
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||505154 (FE-SCITECH)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135448
Bug ID: 1135448
Summary: Review Request: python-XStatic-QUnit - QUnit (XStatic
packaging standard)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135448
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1134565
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127173
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
%package doc
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
Even better, drop that dependency. This documentation package contains just
HTML files, which can be displayed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #6 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
2. Drop rm -rf %{buildroot}
Maybe you could pay attention to the discussion occurring on a ticket before
commenting?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135413
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
(In reply to Pierre-YvesChibon from comment #6)
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
2. Drop rm -rf %{buildroot}
Maybe you could pay attention to the discussion occurring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #8 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7)
(In reply to Pierre-YvesChibon from comment #6)
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
2. Drop rm -rf %{buildroot}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #9 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
@David you probably want to check that link as well, and if you are planning on
packaging this application for epel5, you probably want to look at the next
section ;-)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135457
Bug ID: 1135457
Summary: Review Request: python-XStatic-Rickshaw - Rickshaw
(XStatic packaging standard)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135457
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1134565
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
--- Comment #1 from Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135461
Bug ID: 1135461
Summary: Review Request: python-XStatic-Spin - Spin (XStatic
packaging standard)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135461
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1134565
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617986
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617986
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701866
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701866
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
--- Comment #1 from Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122244
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122244
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135465
Bug ID: 1135465
Summary: Review Request: kde-cli-tools - Tools based on KDE
Frameworks 5 to better interact with the system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
--- Comment #2 from Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com ---
According to the author, FSF address correction has been communicated to
upstream. No problem.
Specfile defines %global ldflags_harden, but uses _ldflags_harden in LDFLAGS.
Licenses are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135413
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135413
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134108
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134108
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135468
Bug ID: 1135468
Summary: Review Request: kf5-kfilemetadata - A Tier 3 KDE
Framework for extracting file metadata
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135468
Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||kf5-kfilemetadata
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135465
Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||kde-cli-tools
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135470
Bug ID: 1135470
Summary: Review Request: kf5-kscreen - A Tier 3 KDE Frameworks
5 Library with API to control screen settings
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #10 from David Parsons david.pars...@inria.fr ---
Hi Christopher and thank you for adding your comments.
I had seen that point 1. (BR gcc-c++) wasn't needed but I thought it was
harmless so I had left it in. I will remove it.
For
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
--- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Jan Synacek from comment #2)
Thanks for the review, new vesion:
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/amprd/amprd.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609817
Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120865
Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jchal...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135413
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135413
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791263
--- Comment #30 from Marcin Zajaczkowski msz...@wp.pl ---
The version is already feature complete, but there are some continuous
delivery related things in progress. I think the first part of September is
pretty possible.
1.10.0 is the next
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609817
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132670
--- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Mo Morsi from comment #3)
The upstream compass test suite isn't minitest5 compatible yet, filed a few
PR's and will update the latest to the most recent master shortly.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609817
--- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791263
--- Comment #31 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Marcin Zajaczkowski from comment #30)
The version is already feature complete, but there are some continuous
delivery related things in progress. I think the first part
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Hi David,
Ralf's comments are right, IMO less legacy RPM stuffs in SPEC will make it
cleaner. Also one more important, if you don't use EPEL, don't maintain
packages on that branch.
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135495
Bug ID: 1135495
Summary: Review Request: kf5-libmm-qt - A Tier 1 KDE Frameworks
module wrapping ModemManager DBus API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
--- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #5)
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029348
Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dpie...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135499
Bug ID: 1135499
Summary: Review Request: kf5-libnm-qt - A Tier 1 KDE Frameworks
5 module that wraps NetworkManager DBus API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590625
Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dpie...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128395
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
--- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #6)
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117223
Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kaperan...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135502
Bug ID: 1135502
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-cors - Middleware for
enabling Cross-Origin Resource Sharing in Rack apps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135503
Bug ID: 1135503
Summary: Review Request: khelpcenter - Application to show KDE
Application's documentation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134351
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Module-Install-TestBase-0.86-2.fc21,perl-Makefile-DOM-0.006-9.fc21 has
been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954
Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
amprd-1.4-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/amprd-1.4-2.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
amprd-1.4-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/amprd-1.4-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135509
Bug ID: 1135509
Summary: Review Request: kinfocenter - KDE Info Center
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135511
Bug ID: 1135511
Summary: Review Request: kmenuedit - KDE menu editor
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo