https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759712
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
dragonegg-3.4-1.el7.2 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dragonegg-3.4-1.el7.2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135519
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to David Parsons from comment #18)
> (In reply to Pierre-YvesChibon from comment #16)
> > (In reply to David Parsons from comment #10)
> > > As for point 3. I had read this:
> > > http://fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #56 from Christopher Meng ---
1. Drop unique, it's not needed since 2.0, not sure why you added(fault?)?
2. FTBFS:
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.wKqPtm
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd nuvolaplayer-2.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890772
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Felix Kaechele from comment #5)
> I was thinking about the rpmlint warning regarding unused direct library
> dependencies.
> Those can be fixed by passing "-Wl,--as-needed" to the LDFLAGS fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716402
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
ckermit-9.0.302-7.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ckermit-9.0.302-7.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
zile-2.4.11-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zile-2.4.11-3.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
ckermit-9.0.302-7.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ckermit-9.0.302-7.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226535
Parag changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #27 from Parag ---
Pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082656
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127720
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134108
Bug 1134108 depends on bug 1127720, which changed state.
Bug 1127720 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooX-ConfigFromFile - Moo eXtension
for initializing objects from config file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127720
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986608
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
weasyprint-0.22-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/weasyprint-0.22-1.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134020
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135528
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135654
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065054
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128754
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135654
Bug ID: 1135654
Summary: Review Request: libpuma - Library for parsing and
manipulating C/C++ source code
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086790
Mohammed Isam changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #26 from Moha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129902
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
--- Comment #5 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081782
Luis Bazan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Luis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
yadifa-1.0.3-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yadifa-1.0.3-2.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
yadifa-1.0.3-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yadifa-1.0.3-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
yadifa-1.0.3-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yadifa-1.0.3-2.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154
Milan Bouchet-Valat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nalimi...@club.fr
Depends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
Milan Bouchet-Valat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||505154 (FE-SCITECH)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621
Susi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||libint
Flags|fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903380
Susi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #30 from Susi L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398
Susi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #49 from Susi L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129902
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670541
Susi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #19 from Susi L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129902
--- Comment #4 from Julien Enselme ---
I included the license file.
I have corrected the rpmlint errors.
Concerning shebang: I didn't find any (and I think than rpmlint can spot this).
Spec URL:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/v
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116653
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|abduco-0.1-1.fc19 |abduco-0.1-1.el6
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117112
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|biblesync-1.0.2-4.fc19 |biblesync-1.0.2-4.el6
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643332
Luke Macken changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890772
--- Comment #7 from Denis Arnaud ---
Yes, for sure, I am still very much interested in having that package finding
its way to Fedora/CentOS/RedHat, as it is the main entry point for the whole
Travel Market Simulator project (http://www.travel-m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134020
Florian "der-flo" Lehner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128395
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande ---
Package build fails: libtoolize package is missing.
> autoreconf -fiv
It's advisable to patching on 'configuration' and 'make' files instead of
include an 'autoreconf' task into package building.
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #18 from David Parsons ---
(In reply to Pierre-YvesChibon from comment #16)
> (In reply to David Parsons from comment #10)
> > As for point 3. I had read this:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Libexecdir (file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134020
--- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Florian "der-flo" Lehner from comment #9)
> hi!
>
> Looks good, but hrere are still some issues:
>
> [ ] You didn't increase the release number
This is not compulsory. Please se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134340
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #17 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Pierre-YvesChibon from comment #14)
> I only partly agree with this, I prefer to review the most complete spec
> file even if things are later cleaned in git.
I've seen way too many rotten
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134020
--- Comment #9 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
hi!
Looks good, but hrere are still some issues:
[ ] You didn't increase the release number
[ ] Source0 doesn't work.
Please replace
https://github.com/%{module_name}/%{module_name}/a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134020
--- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Florian "der-flo" Lehner from comment #7)
> What about these words from pykalman itself:
>
> "This module implements two algorithms for tracking: the Kalman Filter and
> Kalman Smo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #16 from Pierre-YvesChibon ---
(In reply to David Parsons from comment #10)
> As for point 3. I had read this:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Libexecdir (files in lib
> are indeed "executable programs that are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #15 from Pierre-YvesChibon ---
> Finally, you need a sponsor first, *sigh... Hope you can get sponsored soon.
Unless I'm mistaking, I already see two sponsors on that review :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #14 from Pierre-YvesChibon ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #11)
> (In reply to David Parsons from comment #10)
> > However, if EPEL5 is still being used, I suppose it would be best to
> > support it and hence keep the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
--- Comment #49 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029348
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029348
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla ---
Branch exists.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590625
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590625
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134020
--- Comment #7 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
What about these words from pykalman itself:
"This module implements two algorithms for tracking: the Kalman Filter and
Kalman Smoother. In addition, model parameters which are traditionally
sp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086790
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #25 from Pet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134020
--- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Florian "der-flo" Lehner from comment #5)
> hi!
>
> Did you miss to upload the updated spec? Apart from the release number
> nothing has changed.
Yikes! Sorry. Uploaded now:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134003
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134351
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133869
Florian "der-flo" Lehner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129700
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106415
--- Comment #3 from MartinKG ---
(In reply to NIWA Hideyuki from comment #2)
> Hi
> This is my informal review. I comment about the spec file etc.
>
> 1. Source0:sayonara-player-%{svnrev}.tar.gz
>
> URL is necessary for the Source0 t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134020
--- Comment #5 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
hi!
Did you miss to upload the updated spec? Apart from the release number nothing
has changed.
To the description: "The summary should be a short and concise description of
the package. The d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135528
Bug ID: 1135528
Summary: Review Request: kwrited - KDE Write Daemon
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135522
Bug ID: 1135522
Summary: Review Request: kwin - KDE window manager
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #13 from David Parsons ---
OK I will remove "rm -rf %{buildroot}" from %install and add it back into the
EPEL5 package when needed.
As for the %{_prefix}/lib vs %{_libdir} (or %{_libexecdir}), I'm a former
member of the developmen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135519
Bug ID: 1135519
Summary: Review Request: kio-extras - Additional components to
increase the functionality of KIO Framework
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
ampr-ripd-1.11-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ampr-ripd-1.11-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
ampr-ripd-1.11-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ampr-ripd-1.11-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135511
Bug ID: 1135511
Summary: Review Request: kmenuedit - KDE menu editor
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135509
Bug ID: 1135509
Summary: Review Request: kinfocenter - KDE Info Center
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
amprd-1.4-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/amprd-1.4-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
amprd-1.4-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/amprd-1.4-2.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #17 from Steve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134351
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-Install-TestBase-0.86-2.fc21,perl-Makefile-DOM-0.006-9.fc21 has
been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Install-TestBase-0.86-2.fc2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135503
Bug ID: 1135503
Summary: Review Request: khelpcenter - Application to show KDE
Application's documentation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135502
Bug ID: 1135502
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-cors - Middleware for
enabling Cross-Origin Resource Sharing in Rack apps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117223
Fl@sh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kaperan...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
--- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #6)
> Git done (by process-git-requests).
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128395
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590625
Darryl L. Pierce changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dpie...@redhat.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135499
Bug ID: 1135499
Summary: Review Request: kf5-libnm-qt - A Tier 1 KDE Frameworks
5 module that wraps NetworkManager DBus API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029348
Darryl L. Pierce changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dpie...@redhat.com
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
--- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #5)
> Git done (by process-git-requests).
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135495
Bug ID: 1135495
Summary: Review Request: kf5-libmm-qt - A Tier 1 KDE Frameworks
module wrapping ModemManager DBus API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng ---
Hi David,
Ralf's comments are right, IMO less legacy RPM stuffs in SPEC will make it
cleaner. Also one more important, if you don't use EPEL, don't maintain
packages on that branch.
I can help you by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791263
--- Comment #31 from Darryl L. Pierce ---
(In reply to Marcin Zajaczkowski from comment #30)
> The version is already "feature complete", but there are some continuous
> delivery related things in progress. I think the first part of September i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124483
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124482
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
