https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152804
--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #6)
> That said, I regret not to be able to have negative feelings on this
> package. In short, I feel this package should not be included into Fedora.
Sorry, typ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152804
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #6 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151747
pjp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from pjp ---
New P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152245
--- Comment #1 from Michal Srb ---
Similarly as in unsafe-mock review. This package doesn't make much sense in
Fedora, as we have Java 8 (f21+). It's only a build-time dependency of JRuby
and it can be safely omitted when building in Fedora. S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152244
--- Comment #1 from Michal Srb ---
This package is a bit controversial, because it basically bundles
sun.misc.Unsafe from JDK8. And it looks like it's not really needed in Fedora.
If I understand it correctly, it's only a build-time dependency
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152394
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152804
--- Comment #5 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #4)
> I'm also unsure about including the source .c file in -devel -- that seems
> out of the ordinary, but seems to be in line with the _intent_ of upstream
> as a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152804
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Miller ---
I'm also unsure about including the source .c file in -devel -- that seems out
of the ordinary, but seems to be in line with the _intent_ of upstream as a
copylib (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152804
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Miller ---
And sorry to hit you with things one by one here, but: license should be
"Unlicense" -- see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Unlicense and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152804
--- Comment #2 from Scott Talbert ---
Done: https://code.google.com/p/miniz/issues/detail?id=40
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150762
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-xcffib-0.1.7-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-xcffib-0.1.7-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150762
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152804
Matthew Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mat...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152804
Bug ID: 1152804
Summary: Review Request: miniz - Deflate/Inflate compression
library with zlib API, ZIP read/write, PNG write
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151464
--- Comment #7 from Christian Dersch ---
Detailed review below :) There are two (small) points I want to discuss. One is
the documentation already mentioned by Raphael. Can you explain if the part
below is still required? At least my buildsyst
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152575
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152575
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Ignoring.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150762
John Dulaney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RELEASE_PENDING
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150653
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
libosmo-dsp-0.3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libosmo-dsp-0.3-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151747
--- Comment #13 from Robert Mayr ---
Yes sure!
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150653
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
libosmo-dsp-0.3-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libosmo-dsp-0.3-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150653
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
libosmo-dsp-0.3-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libosmo-dsp-0.3-1.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151747
--- Comment #12 from pjp ---
(In reply to Robert Mayr from comment #11)
> Ok, works for me now!
Cool! Thanks so much for the review Robert, I appreciate it. Would you like
to co-maintain 'onionshare' package with me?
Thank you. :)
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151711
--- Comment #4 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #3)
> (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #2)
> > (As also noted by Ralf, but with more details, thus he was quicker:)
> Actually, I read about the new LXQt r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148816
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151369
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248291
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151778
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151779
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148484
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148956
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150284
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152247
--- Comment #2 from Mo Morsi ---
Thanks for review
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #1)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Issues:
> - ASL 2.0 license requires the license text to be included in the RPM
> - Incorrect changelog fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151711
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #2)
> (As also noted by Ralf, but with more details, thus he was quicker:)
Actually, I read about the new LXQt release in the press today and was trying
to check the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152246
--- Comment #2 from Mo Morsi ---
Thx for review. Mostly copy-n-paste errors.
Spec URL: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/joda-timezones.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/joda-timezones-2013d-2.fc20.src.rpm
Koji buil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149300
Paul Wouters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151462
--- Comment #9 from Carlos Morel-Riquelme ---
(In reply to Samuel Sieb from comment #8)
> > note: belen.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/icons/belen.svg ?
> > shebang is a icon file ?
>
> "shebang" is the "#!" line at the start o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151711
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ---
(As also noted by Ralf, but with more details, thus he was quicker:)
Wouldn't liblxqt make more sense as a package name in this case? I know we
often use the *-libs naming convention in Fedora, but we use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151711
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151462
--- Comment #8 from Samuel Sieb ---
> note: belen.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/icons/belen.svg ?
> shebang is a icon file ?
"shebang" is the "#!" line at the start of most script files. For some reason,
it thinks your svg is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151462
--- Comment #7 from Carlos Morel-Riquelme ---
Thank for all help friend :)
well i follow your tips, now i have new spec and srpm
new SPEC https://n0oir.fedorapeople.org/belen.spec
new SRPM https://n0oir.fedorapeople.org/belen-0.1-3.fc21.src.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151711
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||lxqt-libs
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151711
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150504
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry Tantsur ---
Done, links are the same.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1730743/ironic-discoverd/openstack-ironic-discoverd.spec
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1730743/ironic-discoverd/openstack-ironic-discove
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152653
Bug ID: 1152653
Summary: Review Request: miniz - Compression library
implementing the zlib and Deflate
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152247
--- Comment #1 from Michael Simacek ---
Package Review
==
Issues:
- ASL 2.0 license requires the license text to be included in the RPM
- Incorrect changelog format (missing version-release)
- Group tag is obsolete, please don't u
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150504
--- Comment #7 from Haïkel Guémar ---
* You should remove bundled eggs-info in %prep
* I suggest you use the %license tag to mark license files
(For the record, since packaging guidelines has not been updated, you may read
the FPC ticket: http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151462
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855656
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Safe-Isa-1.05-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Safe-Isa-1.05-2.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855656
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Safe-Isa-1.05-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Safe-Isa-1.05-2.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855656
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Safe-Isa-1.05-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Safe-Isa-1.05-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150653
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150666
Bug 1150666 depends on bug 1150653, which changed state.
Bug 1150653 Summary: Review Request: libosmo-dsp - A library with SDR DSP
primitives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150653
What|Removed |A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152246
--- Comment #1 from Michael Simacek ---
Issues:
- Upstream URL doesn't exist
- Source0 URL doesn't exist
- Missing BR exec-maven-plugin and joda-time
- Missing period at the end of description
- Undetermined license - ask upstream to include i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150610
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
kalibrate-rtl-0.4.1-3.20141008gitaae11c8a.el7 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kalibrate-rtl-0.4.1-3.20141008gitaae11c8a.el7
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152575
Pierre-YvesChibon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rb...@redhat.com
Flags|fedora-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151462
--- Comment #5 from Carlos Morel-Riquelme ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248291
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
libXNVCtrl-169.12-12.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libXNVCtrl-169.12-12.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248291
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152575
Pierre-YvesChibon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152575
Bug ID: 1152575
Summary: python-kitchen branch for epel7
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: pin...@p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634036
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634036
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152247
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632808
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632808
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151419
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141872
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-stretchr-testify-0-0.4.gitda775f0.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-stretchr-testify-0-0.4.gitda775f0.el6
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151414
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151369
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Crypt-URandom-0.34-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-URandom-0.34-1.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634036
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rb...@redhat.com
Flags|fedora-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151369
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632808
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rb...@redhat.com
Flags|fedora-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152246
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152245
Michal Srb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152244
Michal Srb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@redhat.com
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141864
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-stretchr-objx-0-0.3.gitcbeaeb1.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-stretchr-objx-0-0.3.gitcbeaeb1.el6
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152244
Michal Srb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148700
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-bmizerany-assert-0-0.2.gite17e998.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-bmizerany-assert-0-0.2.gite17e998.el6
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148702
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-bmizerany-pat-0-0.2.gitb8a3500.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-bmizerany-pat-0-0.2.gitb8a3500.el6
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152394
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152394
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152047
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152047
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148460
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema-0-0.2.gita713d26.el6 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema-0-0.2.gita713d2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874720
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874720
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860424
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860424
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855656
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855656
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674676
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674676
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674674
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo