https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170231
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141569
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166923
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Plack-Middleware-FixMi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170074
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149407
Bug 1149407 depends on bug 1138455, which changed state.
Bug 1138455 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-occi-core - OCCI toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138455
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169895
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-sievelib-0.8-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141569
Bug 1141569 depends on bug 1138455, which changed state.
Bug 1138455 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-occi-core - OCCI toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138455
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138455
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151072
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|fig-0.5.2-1.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138455
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|rubygem-occi-core-4.3.2-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167478
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165584
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|pg_view-1.2.0-2.20141118git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168419
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169863
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166984
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166982
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141569
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|rubygem-occi-api-4.3.1-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170149
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165584
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|pg_view-1.2.0-2.20141118git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164496
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|statsd-0.7.2-3.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169918
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Bug 1169966 depends on bug 1148704, which changed state.
Bug 1148704 Summary: Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-crypto -
Supplementary Go cryptography libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148704
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166984
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.76-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165688
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148704
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166923
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Plack-Middleware-FixMi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166919
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166982
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Pcap-Easy-1.4209-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169485
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164496
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|statsd-0.7.2-3.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
(In reply to Adam Williamson (Fedora) from comment #1)
The 'autoloader' for purpose of running the unit tests is of course
ridiculous and would break the moment upstream touches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239157
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-Pcap-0.17-7.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-Pcap-0.17-7.el7
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
I forget to say, big plus for using a PSR-0 tree, it can be used by PSR-0 and
PSR-4 autoloaders ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891139
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809806
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dd...@cpan.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165641
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Text-BibTeX-0.70-4.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-BibTeX-0.70-4.fc21
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173378
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328
--- Comment #101 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru ---
Skip it. cmake-2.1.0 now is in Fedora repo. So no any problems. Now we need to
have unbundled iris.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173839
Bug ID: 1173839
Summary: Review Request: fstrm - Frame Streams implementation
in C
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173846
Bug ID: 1173846
Summary: Review Request: GBall - The Console Ball and Racket
Game
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173839
Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
--- Comment #5 from Adam Williamson (Fedora) adamw+fed...@happyassassin.net
---
My only real problem with PSR-0ing PSR-4 libraries is, as I said in email, that
we can't entirely rely on them being uniquely named purely by class path, or
about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328
--- Comment #102 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
(In reply to Ivan Romanov from comment #101)
…
to have unbundled iris.
Yeah, we wait for that upstream fix with the official psi package, too.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167076
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173839
--- Comment #2 from Jan Včelák jv+fed...@fcelda.cz ---
Hi Florian,
thank you for taking the review.
I like to track the changes in the spec during a review, so that's why I'm
adding a version to the filename. For your comfort, there is also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127636
--- Comment #4 from Christian Dersch lupi...@mailbox.org ---
Thank you for the review :) I also recognized the missing pistin/postun
scripts, that's what i meant by small issues.
About the plugins: Point 1.) matches the situation, but what do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
--- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson (Fedora) adamw+fed...@happyassassin.net
---
spec updated, new .src.rpm:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/php-bantu-ini-get-wrapper/php-bantu-ini-get-wrapper-1.0.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
(fc21 not fc22,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170824
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-async-each-0.1.6-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-async-each-0.1.6-2.fc21
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170824
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-async-each-0.1.6-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-async-each-0.1.6-2.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170824
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170824
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-async-each-0.1.6-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-async-each-0.1.6-2.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171263
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-istanbul-0.3.2-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-istanbul-0.3.2-3.fc21
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171263
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171263
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-istanbul-0.3.2-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-istanbul-0.3.2-3.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171263
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-istanbul-0.3.2-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-istanbul-0.3.2-3.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171263
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-istanbul-0.3.2-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-istanbul-0.3.2-3.el7
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173839
Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112938
Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140914
Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173839
--- Comment #4 from Jan Včelák jv+fed...@fcelda.cz ---
Before uploading, please
[ ] Rename .spec to {%name}.spec
I will.
[ ] Delete Release-Tag - it is not required and used
OK. I missed that.
= Solution =
APPROVED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166916
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173839
Jan Včelák jv+fed...@fcelda.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821917
--- Comment #22 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Several points raised in comment 17 remain.
Additionally:
* build.log output mentions make check. This could be done in the %check
section of the spec file. If it cannot be done,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
--- Comment #7 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
I really think PSR-4 have no collision risk.
All libraries/classes name use a prefix vendor (as in PSR-0, even if some
libraries doesn't have it...)
PSR-4 is only a shorcut for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091659
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
--- Comment #8 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Quick notes:
I understand why you were confused by PSR-4: you forget the vendor part in
the installation tree ;)
%global php_vendor bantu
%global php_namespace
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
OK, I'm pretty happy with this version. Sorry for the all the updates. This one
uses cmake, all tests pass, and documentation is built properly, and there's a
python3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013836
--- Comment #22 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #21)
- I don't want to use %license. It's mainly target at cloud packages (which
this is not) and complicates the spec for EPEL6 (which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173373
Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173373
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164257
--- Comment #1 from Benoît Marcelin serein...@online.fr ---
The new version is available:
https://sereinit.fedorapeople.org/review/efl-1.12.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
--- Comment #9 from Adam Williamson (Fedora) adamw+fed...@happyassassin.net
---
I understand why you were confused by PSR-4: you forget the vendor part in
the installation tree ;)
Huh. Well, no, I didn't forget it - I was sure I checked the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
Adam Williamson (Fedora) adamw+fed...@happyassassin.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
--- Comment #11 from Adam Williamson (Fedora) adamw+fed...@happyassassin.net
---
new spec and .src.rpm up with things other than the tarball addressed; I'm
leaving the tarball as-is for now pending clarification.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013836
--- Comment #23 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #22)
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #21)
- I don't want to use %license. It's mainly target at cloud packages (which
this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013836
--- Comment #24 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #23)
I just don't see the gain worth the pain of confusing conditionals in the
spec. In any case the guideline is a suggestion, not a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013836
--- Comment #25 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
I am not saying that %license is mandatory, however highly recommended, and the
fact because EPEL6 does not support it) is very weak reasoning.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013836
--- Comment #26 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Yes - for packages that there is no clear benefit for using %license, i.e.
packages that aren't core components of size sensitive products. Unless there
is some other compelling use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013836
--- Comment #27 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
The main reason using %license rather %doc is that (as written in the ticket
and some other) %license files is to be included even when --nodoc is explicity
specified. As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013836
--- Comment #28 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
So %license means that we explicitly distinguish license file with other %doc
and we ensure that it is always included as normal files to comply with license
issue - size issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013836
--- Comment #29 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Thanks, somehow I ended up focusing on the other discussion around this.
Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/scorep.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119164
--- Comment #3 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
Just a ping for this one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
--- Comment #13 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Created attachment 968361
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=968361action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
87 matches
Mail list logo