https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
Sinny Kumari changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ksi...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179665
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|php-true-punycode-1.0.1-1.f |php-true-punycode-1.0.1-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158670
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-Sirupsen-logr |golang-github-Sirupsen-logr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176277
Bug 1176277 depends on bug 1179261, which changed state.
Bug 1179261 Summary: Provide debug flags and useful macro for rpmbuild to
generate valid debuginfo packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179261
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176277
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162103
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-dgnorton-goba |golang-github-dgnorton-goba
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162106
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-kimor79-golle |golang-github-kimor79-golle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179711
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|php-horde-Horde-Idna-1.0.1- |php-horde-Horde-Idna-1.0.1-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172800
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|dwgrep-0.1-6.fc21 |dwgrep-0.1-6.fc20
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1153733
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-rackspace-gop |golang-github-rackspace-gop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174650
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179711
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038274
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162091
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-rakyll-statik |golang-github-rakyll-statik
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167830
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158670
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-Sirupsen-logr |golang-github-Sirupsen-logr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162091
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085840
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-fsouza-go-doc |golang-github-fsouza-go-doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1153733
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-rackspace-gop |golang-github-rackspace-gop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085840
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-fsouza-go-doc |golang-github-fsouza-go-doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165688
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-coreos-go-sys |golang-github-coreos-go-sys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181197
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170201
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166721
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172800
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162103
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179711
Bug 1179711 depends on bug 1179665, which changed state.
Bug 1179665 Summary: Review Request: php-true-punycode - A Bootstring encoding
of Unicode for IDNA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179665
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179665
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162106
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179233
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179309
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071507
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||python-tuskarclient-0.1.3-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183169
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
--- Comment #1 from M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426990
--- Comment #26 from Mark McKinstry ---
Barry,
EPEL 7 RPM is built and just marked as stable, see bug #1126412 for when it
finally hits the stable repo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183195
--- Comment #1 from Jon Ludlam ---
koji link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8648292
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183195
Bug ID: 1183195
Summary: Review Request: ocaml-uutf - Non-blocking streaming
codec for UTF-8, UTF-16, UTF-16LE and UTF-16BE
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183193
Bug ID: 1183193
Summary: Review Request: ceres-solver - A non-linear least
squares minimizer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191
--- Comment #1 from Jon Ludlam ---
koji link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8647847
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191
Bug ID: 1183191
Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability
Description Format (CUDF) library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183001
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler ---
> sed -i "s/set(KDECORATION2_INCLUDEDIR
> \"\${CMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR}\/KDecoration2\")//" CMakeLists.txt
> sed -i
> "s/\${KDECORATION2_INCLUDEDIR}/\${KF5_INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR}\/KDecoration2/g"
> src/CM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183169
Benjamin Pereto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183169
Bug ID: 1183169
Summary: Review Request: ykfde - opening LUKS with yubikey
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218183
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||do...@seketeli.org
Flags|f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851680
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(greg.hellings@gma |needinfo+ fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166947
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166947
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151369
--- Comment #8 from David Dick ---
Hi Petr,
Could you add this package for F20 and F21? Dancer2 has been approved, and i
would like to make it available for the current fedora releases. If you don't
want to, i would happy to maintain the pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166947
David Dick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from David Di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181212
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181105
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182533
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181100
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144802
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
> > > 8. %files should have (note extra dot)
> > > %{_libdir}/libglobus_net_manager.so.*
> >
> > This looks like a cut and paste err
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144802
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Mattias Ellert from comment #2)
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
>
> Many thanks for taking on the review!
>
> > The same as #1181118:
> > 5. %descri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181118
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Mattias Ellert from comment #2)
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
>
> Many thanks for taking on the review!
>
> > 1. remove pkgdocdir definition, Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180723
--- Comment #8 from Jan Pokorný ---
OK, point taken. I will see what I can do about that ... in the corner
case I may use the current arrangement as a meta-specfile (but then,
I have to figure out how not to expand system-defined macros).
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178911
--- Comment #5 from Jan Pokorný ---
> Note that "cairo-dock" is a metapackage, which also depends on
> cairo-dock-plug-ins{,-python2} (ref: bug 1178912), however I can cope
> with
> - build cairo-dock srpm
> - build cairo-dock-plug-ins srpm af
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178911
--- Comment #4 from Jan Pokorný ---
Briefly:
- minor BSD-licensed file discovered
- some dates in changelog would deserve fixing
Below I commented also on some items that are OK:
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135465
Florian "der-flo" Lehner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(d...@der-flo.net) |
--- Comment #12 from Flo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180723
--- Comment #7 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
No, again the point is that it is very difficult for other people including me
to read your spec file. Even if you comment on your macros, readability does
not get better.
Other people may touch your spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869
--- Comment #19 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #17)
> By the way, the reason I moved HPL.dat is that I think it's much more an
> example
> than a system config file; I wouldn't expect hpl typically to be run with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869
--- Comment #18 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Spec URL: http://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/hpl/hpl.spec
SRPM URL: http://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/hpl/hpl-2.1-4.fc21.src.rpm
Merged changes from Dave.
Again, reviewer wanted :) I am ready to trade t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144800
--- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
> 1. %setup -q -n %{_name}-%{version} --> %setup -q
No "%setup -q" is equivalent to "%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}", not to
"%setup -q -n %{_n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181118
--- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
Many thanks for taking on the review!
> 1. remove pkgdocdir definition, Fedora versions which didn't have this are
> EOL
> 2. remove BuildRoot
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144802
--- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
Many thanks for taking on the review!
> The same as #1181118:
> 5. %description reads like an advertisement. It should at least mention what
> "
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169498
--- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to William Moreno from comment #3)
> In the links for Source 1, Source 2, Source 3 %srcname is
> https://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/ReText and the correct URL is
> https://mariobl.fedorapeople.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175302
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178912
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jpoko...@redhat.com
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175302
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178911
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jpoko...@redhat.com
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180723
--- Comment #6 from Jan Pokorný ---
Would it help if I commented on those macros in the specfile directly
so one has a better picture of what is going on?
The point is to omit tedious stuff and touch the specfile as little as
possible later o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179309
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
maxmind-db-java-1.0.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/maxmind-db-java-1.0.0-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179309
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065682
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178911
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
Thank you for taking. I took your review request in exchange.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180723
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175302
--- Comment #5 from Jan Grulich ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: ksysguard
Short Description: KDE Process Management application
Upstream URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/workspace/ksysguard
Owners: g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175302
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182446
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
php-phpseclib-file-asn1-0.3.9-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpseclib-file-asn1-0.3.9-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182446
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
php-phpseclib-file-asn1-0.3.9-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpseclib-file-asn1-0.3.9-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182446
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
php-phpseclib-file-asn1-0.3.9-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpseclib-file-asn1-0.3.9-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182446
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
php-phpseclib-file-asn1-0.3.9-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpseclib-file-asn1-0.3.9-1.el7
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182358
--- Comment #2 from Jan Pokorný ---
Note that the same applies for RHEL 7 -- intended inclusion point is 7.2.
There is python-clufter package shipped in 7.1, but only as a subpackage
of pcs (due to package listing dead-line), which is its excl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180723
--- Comment #4 from Jan Pokorný ---
Two more spec changes:
-
https://github.com/jnpkrn/clufter/commit/a49bc927f0377f23cce2a4b2209148a8276972b4
-
https://github.com/jnpkrn/clufter/commit/b0ca43caa28c8b4272c9900a59ca7dd6261f0ab5
http://people.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175302
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175299
--- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter ---
No objection, Mind posting a new .spec for quick review of upgrade path (ie,
Obsoletes, etc...)?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135511
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(dvra...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135511
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(dvra...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135511
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rdie...@math.unl. |
|edu)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087895
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/argparse4j.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/argparse4j-0.4.4-1.fc20.src.rpm
- add sub-package docs
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?ta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135470
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter ---
-qt5 is fine with me if you don't want to use kf5- prefix for reasons(tm).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178912
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpoko...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182446
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182446
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178911
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpoko...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180058
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180058
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179309
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
