https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969773
--- Comment #5 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Missing BuildRequires:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191803
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-statuses-1.2.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-statuses-1.2.1-1.el7
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #70 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com ---
Please, this official review request on cleaned specfile:
spec:
https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/elasticsearch/review/v1/elasticsearch.spec
srpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169924
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169924
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-supports-color-1.2.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-supports-color-1.2.0-2.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190426
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-prometheus-prometheus-0-0.1.git4e6a807.el6 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169924
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-supports-color-1.2.0-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-supports-color-1.2.0-2.fc21
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190426
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-prometheus-prometheus-0-0.1.git4e6a807.fc20 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190426
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190426
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-prometheus-prometheus-0-0.1.git4e6a807.fc21 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169924
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-supports-color-1.2.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-supports-color-1.2.0-2.el7
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185002
--- Comment #5 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
2 issues, please fix this:
1. Generic:
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached
diff).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191803
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-statuses-1.2.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-statuses-1.2.1-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107800
--- Comment #13 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #12)
From https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags
Adding to and overriding or filtering parts of these flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #71 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/java/
# I'm not aware of any JNI being built
mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_jnidir}/elasticsearch.jar
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_javadir}/elasticsearch.jar
sed -i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969773
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #5)
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191803
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-statuses-1.2.1-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-statuses-1.2.1-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191803
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188763
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193175
Bug ID: 1193175
Summary: Review Request: skylable-sx - Scalable public and
private cloud storage
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185002
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190373
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169925
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-esprima-harmony-jscs-1.1.0-0.2.dev.fc21 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169925
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-esprima-harmony-jscs-1.1.0-0.2.dev.fc20 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169925
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188763
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188763
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-ultron-1.0.1-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-ultron-1.0.1-3.fc21
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190373
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
livestreamer-1.11.1-7.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/livestreamer-1.11.1-7.fc21
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169925
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-esprima-harmony-jscs-1.1.0-0.2.dev.el7 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185002
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188763
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-ultron-1.0.1-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-ultron-1.0.1-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106415
--- Comment #10 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
One more issue, rather cosmetic:
Buildrequires: curl-devel
has to be
BuildRequires: curl-devel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969773
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106415
--- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to MartinKG from comment #8)
Spec URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/2cnhsow8i72mput/sayonara.spec?dl=0
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158872
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193210
Bug ID: 1193210
Summary: Review Request: sxc - Simple XML Compiler
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106415
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106415
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192866
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193207
Bug ID: 1193207
Summary: Review Request: maven-scr-plugin - Maven tool to ease
the development of OSGi components and services
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192866
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192078
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Hrcka thr...@redhat.com ---
Thank you for taking this Josef here is updated srpm and spec file.
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~humaton/rpms/rubygem-fake_ftp.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075605
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|Ready
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969877
Tomas Hrcka thr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987558
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987558
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846561
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/groovy-gram.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/groovy-gram-1.2-0.1.20150216.fc20.src.rpm
Task info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #72 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
- Use %license for the license file
- Consider adding (from sigar):
# Use the same directory of the main package for subpackage licence and docs
%global _docdir_fmt %{name}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186494
Ben Rosser rosser@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #73 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
- Consider removing explicit requires on jpackage-*. Dependency on maven-local
should add it automatically. Also there's no jpackage-tools afaics.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186494
--- Comment #10 from Ben Rosser rosser@gmail.com ---
The -doc sub package is a good idea; I remember considering it and I'm not sure
why I never did so. I will add one.
Thanks for the review(s). :)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190373
--- Comment #24 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #23)
(In reply to Thomas Spura from comment #21)
2. Name it livestreamer and either assume that the python3 module is not
used anywhere or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190418
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707016
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551763
--- Comment #37 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236158
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #48 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707016
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551763
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901365
--- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901365
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169925
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169924
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169924
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Swapped EOL f19 for freshly branched f22.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169925
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191803
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191803
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190373
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190418
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-syndtr-goleveldb-0-0.1.gite9e2c8f.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190418
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-syndtr-goleveldb-0-0.1.gite9e2c8f.fc21 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190418
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-syndtr-goleveldb-0-0.1.gite9e2c8f.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236158
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901365
Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177019
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177019
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #69 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com ---
lucene 4.10.2-4.10.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #75 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Must removing these lines see above
mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/java/
# I'm not aware of any JNI being built
mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_jnidir}/elasticsearch.jar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #76 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
it would be better to upgrade elasticsearch to the latest stable version
(1.4.3)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #80 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #79)
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #71)
this is probably occur because a class or classes try to use
System.loadLibrary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #81 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #80)
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #79)
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #71)
this is probably occur because a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #77 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #74)
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #73)
- Consider removing explicit requires on jpackage-*. Dependency on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191212
--- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Hm. Well, a nodejs_fixdep can take care of that (in this next release)... but
we don't have nodejs-expresso yet to run the test suite.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #78 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #77)
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #74)
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #73)
- Consider removing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #79 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #71)
this is probably occur because a class or classes try to use System.loadLibrary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181726
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Rpmlint output:
dejavu-fonts.src:300: W: non-break-space line 300, char 19
dejavu-fonts.src:304: W: non-break-space line 304, char 21
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #74 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #73)
- Consider removing explicit requires on jpackage-*. Dependency on
maven-local should add it automatically. Also there's no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181726
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Also for reference the previous and only koji el5 build was:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=355715
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192866
--- Comment #3 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to ---
I tested using ghc-bytestring-show for the hedgewars server and things seemed
to work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192078
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089962
--- Comment #7 from Fabian Deutsch fdeut...@redhat.com ---
I missed to push the tags:, here is the commit:
https://github.com/fabiand/radeontop-spec/commit/b48f8c2e7653b58431d42d40c4b49936eba6f91d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074515
--- Comment #29 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #28)
Jan - any reason not to push this F21?
I would ask the other way: Any reason to push this into F21?
F21 is stable and from my POV, this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089962
--- Comment #8 from Fabian Deutsch fdeut...@redhat.com ---
And the link to the raw 0.8-1 spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fabiand/radeontop-spec/b48f8c2e7653b58431d42d40c4b49936eba6f91d/radeontop.spec
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190373
--- Comment #23 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Thomas Spura from comment #21)
2. Name it livestreamer and either assume that the python3 module is not
used anywhere or package it in a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #68 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #64)
I think that so far the tight bundling requirements have not proven to be
true. What is required instead is latest (or at least
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969773
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106415
--- Comment #11 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/sayonara.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/sayonara-0.6.2-3.svn1018.fc21.src.rpm
Mon Feb 16 2015 Martin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158872
--- Comment #4 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
new rpm files:
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/diorite.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/diorite-0.1-0.4git888cb5f.fc21.src.rpm
on Feb 16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192866
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Bruno Wolff III from comment #2)
cabal-rpm had the initial changelog entry owned by the Fedora Haskell SIG
and I wasn't sure if that was OK. Should I change it or add one
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
