https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186503
--- Comment #13 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #12)
Some ignorable things:
* False positive spelling errors
* desktopfile-without-binary: we use xdg-open as a wrapper only
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190361
David King amigad...@amigadave.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194576
--- Comment #3 from Kushal kushal...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194995
David King amigad...@amigadave.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192493
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 994215
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=994215action=edit
fedora-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192493
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 994214
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=994214action=edit
phpcompatinfo.log
phpCompatInfo version 3.7.2
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188530
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 994212
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=994212action=edit
phpcompatinfo.log
phpCompatInfo version 3.7.2
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188530
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 994213
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=994213action=edit
fedora-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842107
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1143032
Kushal kushal...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kushal...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193481
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193481
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 994211
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=994211action=edit
fedora-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193481
--- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 994210
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=994210action=edit
phpcompatinfo.log
phpCompatInfo version 3.7.2
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188530
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158872
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190373
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155376
Sergio Durigan Junior sergi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192493
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188530
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186503
--- Comment #14 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
I had a deeper look at the licensing scenario, and hopefully I figured out what
it really is.
GPL is not applicable, it refers to xml2po.py, which is a helper script
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bjoern.es...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||opensou...@till.name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192493
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194993
--- Comment #2 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com ---
Thank you for the quick response. I was in doubt of the version name and
decided to name the new one *1 to prevent a package rename. But you are right,
I will update the packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179982
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(projects.rg@smart |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968136
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1166655
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193481
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093
--- Comment #18 from John Dulaney jdula...@fedoraproject.org ---
Spec URL: https://jdulaney.fedorapeople.org/qtile-0.9.1-1.fc22.src.rpm
SRPM URL: https://jdulaney.fedorapeople.org/qtile.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
--- Comment #9 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name ---
COPYING.txt needs to be marked as %license if it contains the license text
(this is a recend packaging guideline change)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183193
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
*** Bug 1128662 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183193
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Oh, you don't need to step aside this time because I don't have plenty of time,
please continue. ;)
Next time please search bugzilla before submitting packages, because there are
always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128662
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188530
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974707
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974707
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106415
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193481
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #131 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Issues:
- please reflow %description into paragraphs separated with empty lines. rpm -i
and other tools treat it as preformatted text and it looks a bit ugly right
now.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093
--- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
As mentioned:
1. MUST fix Licensing: NOT ok
In addition to MIT licensed stuff, we have
libqtile/widget/pacman.py:GPL (v3 or later)
libqtile/widget/google_calendar.py:Apache (v2.0)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141494
--- Comment #21 from Tonet Jallo tonet6...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://tonet666p.fedorapeople.org/python-flask-whooshalchemy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://tonet666p.fedorapeople.org/python-flask-whooshalchemy-0.6-6.fc21.src.rpm
Hi, i just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192493
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #10 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
Bother. That should have been
SRPM: https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/hypre-2.8.0b-16.el6.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665733
--- Comment #28 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Ok, first a couple of non-blockers from a spec review:
1. Group tags have not been required for some time.
2. Fedora 20 is the oldest supported release so the conditional really isn't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554
--- Comment #6 from Raman Gupta rocketra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Tom spot Callaway from comment #5)
Is there any update on clarifying the actual licenses for these files?
Does this Asterisk wiki page (dated 2014) count as clarification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194545
--- Comment #3 from Adam Williamson (Red Hat) awill...@redhat.com ---
I find the guidelines wonderfully unhelpful on the topic:
When naming packages for Fedora, the maintainer must use the dash '-' as the
delimiter for name parts. The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194798
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
I was thinking to update this roughly quarterly, and then anyone that wanted
updates more often could use the cron scripts.
If you wanted to co-maintain and push updates monthly though
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183193
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
I'm confused now. I asked you in comment 1 to see if you would let me finish
this since I'm the first, and you never asked me in private before you
submitted this.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193990
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186503
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build fails:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9017448
From build.log:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X954tf: line 49: desktop-file-install: command not found
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191212
Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1150500 |1194993
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194993
Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1191212
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194576
--- Comment #2 from Kushal kushal...@gmail.com ---
-Fixed the issue with tests at upstream.
-Bumped to new version
-Added python3 packaging
SRPM : https://kushal124.fedorapeople.org/python-docx-0.8.4-1.fc20.src.rpm
SPEC :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186503
--- Comment #9 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
new rpm package:
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/openclonk.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/openclonk-5.5.1-4.fc21.src.rpm
%changelog
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194993
Bug ID: 1194993
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-colors1 - Get colors in your
Node.js console
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183193
--- Comment #5 from Taylor Braun-Jones tay...@braun-jones.org ---
Hi Christopher, That sounds fine to me. You'll just need to fix the broken
links to your spec and SRPM.
Antonio, once bug 1128662 is updated with with working spec and SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171205
--- Comment #6 from Jose Pedro Oliveira jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com ---
Hi,
Would it also be possible to have this package branched and built for EPEL6 and
EPEL7? A new version of the nagios plugin check-updates is already using this
perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194993
Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rb...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #9 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
I made some updates, particularly to survive el6 and rawhide scratch builds,
not just copr.
SRPM: https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/hypre-2.8.0b-15.el6.src.rpm
Scratch builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869
--- Comment #21 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
The current version doesn't build, with
error: Directory not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/hpl-2.1-4.fc23.x86_64/etc/mpich-x86_64/hpl
etc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186503
--- Comment #12 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build (I started my own because I wasn't aware of yours):
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9018116
The rpmlint output is attached.
Some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184381
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
meson-0.22.0-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/meson-0.22.0-3.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184381
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194993
--- Comment #1 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
When we introduce parallel-installable library packages of any language in
Fedora, we typically package the older version as a separate SRPM, and leave
the unversioned name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148452
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-onsi-gomega-0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191212
--- Comment #9 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com ---
I've requested a review for multiversioned nodejs-colors. Please remove both
fixdeps (including the caret) and enable tests. The multiversion doesn't seem
to work with the fixdeps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194995
Bug ID: 1194995
Summary: Review Request: clutter-gst3 - GStreamer integration
for Clutter
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186503
--- Comment #10 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
moch build and Scratch build are successfully:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9018065
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665733
--- Comment #29 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
FWIW, I was taking a break from something else I was working on and decided to
try adding boost-devel and rm -rf include/boost and was able to build packages
for rawhide.
I also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692
Adam Williamson (Red Hat) awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186503
--- Comment #11 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 994199
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=994199action=edit
rpmlint output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173773
Adam Williamson (Red Hat) awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
74 matches
Mail list logo
