https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184381
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642601
Bug 642601 depends on bug 1177697, which changed state.
Bug 1177697 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-macaddr - MAC Address
Determination for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177697
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177805
Bug 1177805 depends on bug 1177697, which changed state.
Bug 1177697 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-macaddr - MAC Address
Determination for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177697
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177697
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177697
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-macaddr-1.7.1-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190361
--- Comment #7 from David King ---
I don't see why it shouldn't be packaged for F21, especially as F22 won't be
out for quite a while still. As a developer, it would be nice to play with this
on the stable branch (and it should not impact othe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192969
Dmitry Tantsur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Dmit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174974
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1024368 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195153
Bug ID: 1195153
Summary: Review Request: python-lmiwbem - package rename
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #135 from jiri vanek ---
SPEC:
https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/elasticsearch/review/v8/elasticsearch.spec
SRPM:
https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/elasticsearch/review/v8/elasticsearch-1.4.4-0.fc23.src.rpm
changes:
add missing depend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159
--- Comment #33 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Fedora Update System from comment #32)
> libsbml-5.11.0-11.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsbml-5.11.0-11.fc21
libsbml is no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093
--- Comment #26 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
---
> I'll see about poking fpc to update that to be clearer somehow
> (suggestions welcome).
The current wording likely has been inherited from very old guidelines that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195153
Michal Minar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194628
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1)
> Note: All the patched files are read-only. I assume the patching could
> fail, even though it currently doesn't. Perhaps making them writable before
> patching wo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171205
--- Comment #7 from Petr Šabata ---
(In reply to Jose Pedro Oliveira from comment #6)
> Hi,
>
> Would it also be possible to have this package branched and built for EPEL6
> and EPEL7? A new version of the nagios plugin check-updates is alrea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194628
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178912
--- Comment #29 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
ping again? I would really want to import this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180723
--- Comment #21 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
ping again?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159
--- Comment #34 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I know ;)
If segfaults in tests fairly reliably. I was hoping that this might be caused
by some gcc issues and resolve itself on its own. If you could take a look,
it'd be great.
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194628
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195255
Bug ID: 1195255
Summary: Review Request: compat-tolua++ - lua-5.1 compatible
version of tolua++ (C++ Lua integration)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195255
Martin Preisler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mprei...@redhat.com
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730
Donald Pellegrino changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740814
--- Comment #13 from Donald Pellegrino ---
I made an attempt at updating the .spec file for the latest release of Apache
Jena. The new .spec is attached to the review request at bug#1193730. I am
willing to maintain this package however this is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #136 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
- There's no such thing as systmed-units. Please remove BR:systemd-units.
- I think you might want to remove printing of the jar list in the wrapper
script. It is rather long and ends up in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akurt...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com
F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195279
Bug ID: 1195279
Summary: Review Request: preupgrade-assistant - Preupgrade
assistant a tool for assess system before an upgrade
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #137 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #136)
> - There's no such thing as systmed-units. Please remove BR:systemd-units.
will be fixed ( I thought it was)
> - I think you might want to remove
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123399
Bug 1123399 depends on bug 1126521, which changed state.
Bug 1126521 Summary: Please update dateutil to 2.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126521
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195279
Petr Hracek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164378
javierwilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: pulse - |Review Request: syncthing -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192969
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Tantsur ---
sorry, an update:
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-hardware
Short Description: Hardware detection and classification utilities
Upstream URL: https://pypi.python.org/py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195255
--- Comment #1 from Martin Preisler ---
The Source0 URL doesn't work - 404 error. Do we have any working source for
these tarballs? I tried to google for it for a while with no success.
The %define macro should be changed to %global.
There a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #22 from Russell Harrison ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: rubygem-puppet-lint
New Branches: epel7
Owners: rharrison
I was reminded by a user that I forgot to request a el7 branch when RHEL7 was
relea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956147
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|wide-dhcpv6-20080615-13.1.f |wide-dhcpv6-20080615-13.1.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018057
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-googlecode-goprotobu |golang-googlecode-goprotobu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148456
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-onsi-ginkgo-0 |golang-github-onsi-ginkgo-0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956147
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|wide-dhcpv6-20080615-13.1.e |wide-dhcpv6-20080615-13.1.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009967
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-googlecode-net-0-0.1 |golang-googlecode-net-0-0.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|nodejs-jsonparse-0.0.6-5.el |nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.el
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085890
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-spf13-pflag-0 |golang-github-spf13-pflag-0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188895
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-GridDataFormats-0.2. |python-GridDataFormats-0.2.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172198
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-davecgh-go-sp |golang-github-davecgh-go-sp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.el |nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.el
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172603
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-ghodss-yaml-0 |golang-github-ghodss-yaml-0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194058
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195255
--- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
Thanks for the review. I've done a new version fixing the Source0 problem by
not using an url. You can verify the md5sum of the sources by looking in the
lookaside cache for the normal tolua++ package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194058
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
There's a problem with git branch creation at the moment, we're working on it.
Once we have it worked out I'll run the whole queue ASAP.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824083
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rosser@gmail.com|
--- Comment #11 from Petr Šabata ---
Pi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191042
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
Sorry about the delay,I got distracted by other stuff.
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1)
>
> Missing BRs:
Fixed.
> Many missing dependencies from the resulting binary RPM. This is mostly
> fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
Bug ID: 1195375
Summary: Review Request: autoconf268 - autoconf 2.68 for epel6
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
Dave Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1174292
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191042
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692
Adam Williamson (Fedora) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195255
Martin Preisler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Niemantsverdriet ---
I have updated and tested the spec file and fixed the systemd service issues.
The updated files are located here:
SPEC URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~kaptk2/burp.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorape
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141494
--- Comment #24 from Tonet Jallo ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-flask-whooshalchemy
Short Description: Whoosh extension to Flask/SQLAlchemy
Upstream URL: https://github.com/gyllstromk/Flask-WhooshAlche
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194188
Florian "der-flo" Lehner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1143032
Solly Ross changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sr...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178528
--- Comment #3 from Christian Krause ---
Here are the update files using a lowercase package name:
Spec URL: https://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/python-send2trash.spec
SRPM URL:
https://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/python-send2trash-1.3.0-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183258
David Dick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from David Di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183286
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Crypt-PWSafe3-1.16-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-PWSafe3-1.16-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183286
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Crypt-PWSafe3-1.16-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-PWSafe3-1.16-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187944
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piotr1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195054
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665733
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195058
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187961
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piotr1...@gmail.com
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
No owners listed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183258
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692
--- Comment #10 from Adam Williamson (Red Hat) ---
christ, this bureaucracy is so ridiculous. clearly, the person who filed the
damn review request is an owner. why do we still have this ludicrous system?
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692
Adam Williamson (Fedora) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183258
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093
--- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178912
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jpokorny@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188530
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188530
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188018
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piotr1...@gmail.com
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188514
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piotr1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195153
Michal Minar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mimi...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187944
--- Comment #2 from Gerard Ryan ---
Hi Piotr,
Thanks for the reviews this evening! Do you have any open reviews on which I
could return the favor?
I'll have a look at this one tomorrow and hopefully push a working version.
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191042
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Emm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186497
--- Comment #4 from Ben Rosser ---
Added new documentation subpackage and fixed a few other things:
Spec: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/libtifiles2.spec
SRPM: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/libtifiles2-1.1.6-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190411
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-requests-toolbelt-0. |python-requests-toolbelt-0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190418
Bug 1190418 depends on bug 1190411, which changed state.
Bug 1190411 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-syndtr-gosnappy -
Implementation of the Snappy compression format for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190411
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190411
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-syndtr-gosnap |golang-github-syndtr-gosnap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|layla-fonts-1.4-1.fc21 |layla-fonts-1.4-1.fc20
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.el |nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #35 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183286
Bug 1183286 depends on bug 1183258, which changed state.
Bug 1183258 Summary: Review Request: perl-Bytes-Random-Secure - Perl extension
to generate cryptographically-secure random bytes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183258
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo