https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204812
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204151
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204777
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203167
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-docopt-docopt-go-0-0.1.git.854c423.fc22 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 22.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204172
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204777
Aurelien Bompard aurel...@bompard.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204151
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203167
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-docopt-docopt-go-0-0.1.git.854c423.el7 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204812
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910798
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910798
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204172
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204898
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202850
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312
--- Comment #26 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Some remaining issues:
- I missed one more bundled library in the first pass, my apologies.
Fortunately it is already packaged, so this is an easy fix.
This also depends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203167
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205479
--- Comment #1 from Zygmunt Krynicki m...@zygoon.pl ---
The correct URLs are below:
Spec URL: http://pi.zygoon.pl/~zyga/python-morris.spec
SRPM URL: http://pi.zygoon.pl/~zyga/python-morris-1.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205479
Bug ID: 1205479
Summary: Review Request: python-morris - An announcement
(signal/event) system for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205489
Bug ID: 1205489
Summary: Review Request: edeploy - Linux system provisioning
and upgrades made easy
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205248
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140914
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204009
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135700
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1197395
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055712
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204151
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204151
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186501
--- Comment #11 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #10)
I think the tests are failing as a result of running inside a chroot
(probably because they try to do something with USB?), but I'm not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204151
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202063
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
now it seems to me that rpmbuild wants to find sources inside tarball in
directory named packagename-version and if I change package name, the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055712
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
docker-1.5.0-24.git5ebfacd.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docker-1.5.0-24.git5ebfacd.fc22
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204151
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204176
Bug 1204176 depends on bug 1204151, which changed state.
Bug 1204151 Summary: Review Request: perl-PBKDF2-Tiny - Minimalist PBKDF2 (RFC
2898) with HMAC-SHA1 or HMAC-SHA2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204151
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894602
Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376
Bug ID: 1205376
Summary: Review Request: spooky-c - C port of Bob Jenkins'
spooky hash algorithm
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205361
Bug ID: 1205361
Summary: Review Request: postproof - Mail abuse incident tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204898
--- Comment #4 from Kaleb KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com ---
- The build system seems suboptimal. Why does it need to be patched in
spec file, *and* then fixed up afterwards in %install?
1) The patch and the fixups should eventually go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894602
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894602
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #11 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL http://cthugha.org/fedora/hyperrogue-5.5a-2.fc21.src.rpm
I followed your instructions:
- Compile with right flag (I think,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015253
Anders Blomdell anders.blomd...@control.lth.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1143032
Alexander Bokovoy aboko...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(abokovoy@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204777
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094042
Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910798
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204151
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204151
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Invalid branches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204898
--- Comment #5 from Kaleb KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com ---
Or I could just remove the `make install` and install everything explicitly
in the spec.
Yes, I think I like that best.
New spec and SRPM at the above location
Koji scratch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204898
Kaleb KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: libntirpc - |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Erik van Pienbroek from comment #1)
Taking for review
* Is there a particular reason why you're running 'autoreconf'? There are no
patches bundled which require the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060920
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
I noticed myself that I'd put wrong license tag in the spec file. Here are
updated files:
* Tue Mar 24 2015 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com - 1.2-2
- Package review fixes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200955
--- Comment #3 from Chandan Kumar chkumar...@gmail.com ---
Hey Parag,
Thanks for the review.
Here is the updated
SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-wrapt.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204779
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-XStatic-Magic-Search-0.2.0.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204779
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204779
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-XStatic-Magic-Search-0.2.0.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-XStatic-Magic-Search-0.2.0.1-1.fc22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202604
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312
--- Comment #27 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com ---
SPEC: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra.spec
SRPM: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra-0.14.21-2.fc20.src.rpm
* Mon Mar 23 2015 Jonathan G. Underwood
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312
--- Comment #28 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com ---
Will run fedora-review against these packages and report back.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: xpra - |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312
--- Comment #29 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com ---
SPEC: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra.spec
SRPM: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra-0.14.21-3.fc20.src.rpm
* Tue Mar 24 2015 Jonathan G. Underwood
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204898
--- Comment #3 from Kaleb KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com ---
- ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
Note: /sbin/ldconfig not called in libntirpc
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries
Fixed,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205346
Bug ID: 1205346
Summary: Review Request: php-bartlett-umlwriter - Create UML
class diagrams from your PHP source
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184446
--- Comment #4 from Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com ---
New Spec URL: https://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/tunir.spec
New SRPM URL: https://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/tunir-0.5-1.fc21.src.rpm
No Python3 for now.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182770
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182770
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203167
Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182770
--- Comment #7 from Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com ---
Both the SPEC file and mod_proxy_fcgi backport looks OK to me. SetHandler with
proxy won't work unless you patch it into httpd, you can't do that just with
a module, so that's expected.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892
Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203105
--- Comment #5 from Lon Hohberger l...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- gems should require rubygems package
Note: Requires: rubygems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203067
--- Comment #6 from Lon Hohberger l...@redhat.com ---
Reviewed spec diff - looks good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203067
Lon Hohberger l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203105
--- Comment #6 from Lon Hohberger l...@redhat.com ---
So, base package needs:
Requires: rubygems
This will resolve the general issue reported by fedora-review and the specific
issues of the directories not being correctly owned by the
101 - 173 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
