https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206295
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203610
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-GStreamer1-0.003-2.fc2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200384
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200520
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200520
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-debtcollector-0.3.0-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-debtcollector-0.3.0-3.fc22
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203155
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206080
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207116
Bug ID: 1207116
Summary: Review Request: groovy-sandbox - Groovy sandbox for
executing untrusted Groovy scripts safely
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207116
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207116
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207116
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207116
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036254
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168017
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167076
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201662
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202431
--- Comment #10 from Milan Crha mc...@redhat.com ---
Ah, there was an issue with a doc subpackage dependency. I dropped it and it
builds fine now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201662
--- Comment #15 from Marek Skalický mskal...@redhat.com ---
I agree. Sorry, moved.
Spec URL: https://mskalick.fedorapeople.org/wiredtiger/wiredtiger.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mskalick.fedorapeople.org/wiredtiger/wiredtiger-2.5.1-5.fc23.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207116
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
need asm-all-distroshaded
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202431
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libical-glib-1.0.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libical-glib-1.0.2-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199840
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #7)
Good. The W3C software license [1] requires the license text to be
distributed along the software, so it should be included as additional
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199840
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Created attachment 1008313
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1008313action=edit
W3C license
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207116
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
you could use antrun plugin to compile files groovy
e.g.
plugin
artifactIdmaven-antrun-plugin/artifactId
version1.4/version
dependencies
dependency
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201662
--- Comment #17 from Marek Skalický mskal...@redhat.com ---
Changed...
Jonathan, thank you very much for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199840
--- Comment #7 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
Good. The W3C software license [1] requires the license text to be distributed
along the software, so it should be included as additional source.
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204172
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204151
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201662
Marek Skalický mskal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: wiredtiger |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202431
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204176
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206080
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207116
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708402
--- Comment #13 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #12)
Unfortunately it can't currently go in EPEL6,
due to the boost version required, but it's in the above copr using the
boost scl if anyone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206086
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376
--- Comment #5 from Jeff Layton jlay...@poochiereds.net ---
Ok, new specfile/srpm here:
https://jlayton.fedorapeople.org/spooky-c/
...you'll want the '-2' package. This should cover all of the above concerns.
It adds a manpage and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202591
Martin Kho lists@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lists@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207163
Bug ID: 1207163
Summary: Review Request: jenkins-script-security-plugin -
Jenkins Script Security Plugin
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199840
--- Comment #12 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #11)
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #10)
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #8)
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207116
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1207163
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207163
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206080
--- Comment #4 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Why the weird source URL?
- The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676930
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gmock-1.6.0-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmock-1.6.0-3.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177055
--- Comment #7 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
It appears gmock has been submitted, and I submitted a bugzilla for an epel
branch for picojson.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988997
Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(pwouters@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708402
Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177055
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1207214
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261
--- Comment #39 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Correct me if I am wrong but I see your total package submission is 2. Your
informal package reviews are 2 which includes a single full package review yet.
I was waiting for more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070406
--- Comment #16 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
looks good to me thanks, approved++ double plus good
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187869
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187869
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugzilla.redhat.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168017
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070406
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kvo...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206528
Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207208
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com ---
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9365710
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187869
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989791
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206080
--- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #2)
Some things first from a manual review of your spec file:
%bcond_without bootstrap
What's this for?
This allows the same SRPM to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141817
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-google-gofuzz-0-0.6.gitbbcb9da.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206528
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205121
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206080
--- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #4)
- Why the weird source URL?
This is a way of forcing different local file name of given source. rpmbuild
sees only the part after last
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207208
Bug ID: 1207208
Summary: Review Request: flatbuffers - Memory Efficient
Serialization Library from Google
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165688
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
flannel-0.2.0-7.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flannel-0.2.0-7.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207208
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||flatbuffers
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165688
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
flannel-0.2.0-7.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flannel-0.2.0-7.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141817
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-google-gofuzz-0-0.6.gitbbcb9da.fc22 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 22.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141817
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-google-gofuzz-0-0.6.gitbbcb9da.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199840
--- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/thymeleaf.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/thymeleaf-2.1.4-3.fc20.src.rpm
- add W3C license
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199840
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204898
--- Comment #9 from Kaleb KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com ---
Everything looks good except for the one issue with the Requires described
above. Please fix that before pushing. Package is APPROVED.
fixed Requires, spec and srpm at above
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202604
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202604
--- Comment #19 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #18)
Packaging looks good, the comments above were all addressed, rpmlint output
is OK.
sscg.noarch: W: no-documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165688
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
flannel-0.2.0-7.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flannel-0.2.0-7.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141817
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-google-gofuzz-0-0.6.gitbbcb9da.fc21 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199840
--- Comment #10 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #8)
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #7)
Good. The W3C software license [1] requires the license text to be
distributed along the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207116
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199840
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #10)
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #8)
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #7)
Good. The W3C software license [1] requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207163
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1205637
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261
--- Comment #38 from Sinny Kumari ksi...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
Can I get sponsorship now in order to build this package for Fedora rawhide or
still more works need to be done from my side?
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199840
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206080
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
--- Comment #3 from Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 1008345
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1008345action=edit
Successful Koji *scratch* build log
--
$ koji build --scratch rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207163
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205121
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204898
Kaleb KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206080
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
--- Comment #127 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
(In reply to Steve Jenkins from comment #120)
Hey, Paul. Thanks for the great feedback. I'll make those changes.
On the macro usage, however, I wasn't sure how far to take it. :) I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126990
--- Comment #12 from Jaromír Cápík jca...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Sources used to build the package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
--- Comment #128 from Steve Jenkins st...@stevejenkins.com ---
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #127)
Well if you can grep -i the spec for opendmarc and it finds only the
Name: line, you're probably done :-)
LOL - alright! Noted!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207280
Bug ID: 1207280
Summary: Review Request: python-semantic_version - A library
implementing the 'SemVer' scheme
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203749
--- Comment #9 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
Thanks for taking it.
I made makefile use DESTDIR in the usual way (not as above) by patching it.
Is this covered by policy somewhere? It seems a waste of effort
to me, and I've made
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
--- Comment #129 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
(In reply to Steve Jenkins from comment #128)
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #127)
Well if you can grep -i the spec for opendmarc and it finds only the
Name: line, you're
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095012
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199055
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org//mediawiki123.spec
SRPM URL:
http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org//mediawiki123-1.23.8-1.fc21.src.rpm
- Make the mw-config directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197505
--- Comment #4 from Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Ross Lagerwall from comment #2)
Thanks for the review!
(In reply to Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) from comment
#1)
License: LGPLv2+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094570
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203749
--- Comment #10 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #9)
Thanks for taking it.
I made makefile use DESTDIR in the usual way (not as above) by patching it.
Is this covered by policy somewhere?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199840
Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199840
--- Comment #16 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo