https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189611
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
fedpkg-minimal-1.0.0-3.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189611
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
fedpkg-minimal-1.0.0-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982588
Juan Orti juan.o...@miceliux.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209366
Bug ID: 1209366
Summary: Review Request: qmapshack - GPS mapping and management
tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206295
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-curtsies-0.1.19-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205793
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199567
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199567
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ExchangeIR-0.0.8.2-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ExchangeIR-0.0.8.2-2.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208764
--- Comment #3 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/vagrant-cachier.spec
SRPM URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/vagrant-cachier-1.2.0-2.fc23.src.rpm
I fixed the above + spelling[0]
[0]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199567
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ExchangeIR-0.0.8.2-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ExchangeIR-0.0.8.2-2.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206295
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200157
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208821
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199829
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com ---
I have looked a bit more closely at the Makefile included with the project
(which is a bit of a mess). Really, I think the best way to set CFLAGS reliably
is to break the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.1.el7
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.1.fc22
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.1.fc21
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182358
Radek Steiger rstei...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||TestBlocker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165354
Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165354
--- Comment #14 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch ---
I'm guessing there is a reason there is no .el6 version?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
--- Comment #14 from Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com ---
Thanks Ralf!
I've fixed the warning due to %check inside changelog.
I've also included all directories for -docs package to clean properly. I guess
I also should put sysconfdir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209446
Bug ID: 1209446
Summary: Review Request: carbonate - Utilities for managing
graphite clusters
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.2.el7
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.2.fc22
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186501
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196957
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Updated SPEC and SRPM:
SPEC:
http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-XStatic-Angular-lrdragndrop.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.2.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dibbler-1.0.1-0.RC1.2.fc21
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206639
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200157
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165354
--- Comment #15 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se ---
(In reply to Steve Traylen from comment #14)
I'm guessing there is a reason there is no .el6 version?
There is no bouncycastle-mail package in epel 6.
There is a maintainer,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208904
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208821
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208821
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200157
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200157
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874
--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Please use FAS in InitialCC, not email.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989792
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208904
Ari LiVigni alivi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alivi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982588
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982588
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208904
--- Comment #3 from Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #2)
Hi Colin, would you be ok with me renaming this to simply
jenkins-job-builder ? I noticed dcaro's package was named this way, and I
think it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208738
--- Comment #13 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
(In reply to Taylor Braun-Jones from comment #12)
…
I'm not able to reproduce the rawhide error that you're are seeing. Since
what you were seeing was an internal compiler error, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874
Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124111
Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196289
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsvet...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208738
--- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
Created attachment 1011857
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1011857action=edit
licensecheck.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124111
--- Comment #8 from Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com ---
Spec URL: https://mayorga.fedorapeople.org/python-spec.spec
SRPM URL: https://mayorga.fedorapeople.org/python-spec-1.0.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
Thanks for the review.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874
--- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199567
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205587
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124111
--- Comment #7 from Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu ---
You made a small mistake in the changelog: you forgot the release number.
Everything else looks fine.
Once you have corrected the changelog, I will approve this package.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124111
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124111
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186501
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186501
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200157
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-nenv-0.2.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-nenv-0.2.0-2.el7
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186501
Ben Rosser rosser@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124111
Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200157
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200157
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-nenv-0.2.0-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-nenv-0.2.0-2.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200157
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-nenv-0.2.0-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-nenv-0.2.0-2.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204445
Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209645
Bug ID: 1209645
Summary: Review Request: bbcp - Securely and quickly copy data
from source to target
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203067
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-em-worker-0.0.2-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-em-worker-0.0.2-2.el7
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208904
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Greg Swift gregsw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204445
--- Comment #2 from William Moreno williamjmore...@gmail.com ---
I an lookiing for how to define the %license macro for Epel 6 and 7 branch, can
you help me to find this to update the spec.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975259
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/grizzly-npn.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/grizzly-npn-1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
- use system JVM jsse apis
- fix felix plugin configuration
76 matches
Mail list logo