https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177805
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-uuid-2.3.7-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177805
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-uuid-2.3.7-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203167
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142491
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-ox-2.1.8-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199184
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142491
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-ox-2.1.8-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203167
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-docopt-docopt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202805
Eugene A. Pivnev ti.eug...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208904
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208904
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208509
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208509
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-License-Syntax-0.13-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-License-Syntax-0.13-1.fc22
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208509
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-License-Syntax-0.13-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-License-Syntax-0.13-1.fc21
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
The plugins ships with some bundled libraries, if I am not mistaken. Not sure
how much of the code is original and how much of it is just copied from
somewhere.
Also, the components are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203801
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
osbs-0.2-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osbs-0.2-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203801
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
osbs-0.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osbs-0.2-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209809
Bug ID: 1209809
Summary: Review Request: rubyripper - cdparanoia based high
quality cd ripper
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203801
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
osbs-0.2-2.c1216ba.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osbs-0.2-2.c1216ba.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210004
Bug ID: 1210004
Summary: Review Request: libkindrv - Driver for controlling
robotic arms by Kinova
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203801
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
osbs-0.2-2.c1216ba.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osbs-0.2-2.c1216ba.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libspf2-1.2.10-5.20150405gitd57d79fd.fc22 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libspf2-1.2.10-5.20150405gitd57d79fd.fc22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208816
--- Comment #13 from Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com ---
Addressed pending comments. On Fedora 22 %dir was required in order to own all
created directories.
Built with mock on Fedora 22.
Tested with rpmlint and fedora-review on Fedora 22.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209946
Bug ID: 1209946
Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Meta-TypeConstraint-Mooish
- Translate Moo-style constraints to Moose-style
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209946
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1209926
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203476
--- Comment #12 from James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com ---
spec file updated fixing the odd tabs hiding inside and adding the CFLAGS to
the make invocation
Having trouble running fedora-review locally right now since I moved to F22
beta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203476
--- Comment #13 from James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com ---
Sorry wrong srpm url there...
Spec URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/sslh/sslh.spec
SRPM URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/sslh/sslh-1.17-1.fc22.src.rpm
Fedora Account
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209946
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libspf2-1.2.10-5.20150405gitd57d79fd.el7 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libspf2-1.2.10-5.20150405gitd57d79fd.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libspf2-1.2.10-5.20150405gitd57d79fd.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209974
Bug ID: 1209974
Summary: Review Request: usbguard-applet-qt - USBGuard Qt
applet
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libspf2-1.2.10-5.20150405gitd57d79fd.fc21 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libspf2-1.2.10-5.20150405gitd57d79fd.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209974
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com ---
The usbguard-devel package is needed to build this one. The review bug for
usbguard is here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209971.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209946
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libspf2-1.2.10-5.20150405gitd57d79fd.el6 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209971
Bug ID: 1209971
Summary: Review Request: usbguard - A tool for implementing USB
device usage policy
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204445
--- Comment #3 from Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com ---
Look at this example on how to define %license:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/twms.git/tree/twms.spec#n41. This is needed
only for EPEL 7.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200157
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202146
Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203476
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208816
--- Comment #14 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com
---
For formal information, this is fedora-review output with
some redundancies removed.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202146
Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208816
Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174479
Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1210053
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #1)
1) When I ran fedora-review on this package, I see
Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
I must have picked the wrong file from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
Bug ID: 1210054
Summary: Review Request: rc - Re-implementation for Unix of the
Plan 9 shell
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203801
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
osbs-0.2-2.c1216ba.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osbs-0.2-2.c1216ba.el6
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203801
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
osbs-0.2-2.c1216ba.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osbs-0.2-2.c1216ba.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203801
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
osbs-0.2-2.c1216ba.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osbs-0.2-2.c1216ba.el7
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
--- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de ---
I think the license is zlib, but I would appreciate a careful cross-check.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208816
--- Comment #16 from Paulo Andrade pandr...@redhat.com ---
Sandro, be welcome as a fedora packager!
This time using my hatter account not by mistake :)
If you need any further assistance feel free to ping me,
I am pcpa in freenode, and in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196925
--- Comment #8 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Please update the changelog and release when updating spec. Also provide new
links after your changes [1]
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196925
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ngomp...@gmail.com ---
I've replaced the spec and srpm with updated versions to correct those issues.
However, I prefer not to remove the version declarations for the plugins and
junit as it isn't hurting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199693
Nathan Scott nath...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174479
Bug 1174479 depends on bug 1210053, which changed state.
Bug 1210053 Summary: Update to python-enum34 1.0.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210053
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199829
--- Comment #10 from Tonet Jallo tonet6...@gmail.com ---
Ok Jonathan, sorry if I still have errors, I still have problems with english,
but i'm learning. I will communicate with the developer for work in that.
Thank you again Jonathan.
Have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203476
James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
OK, I have uploaded the matching source rpm, I'll sit on the rest of them until
you weigh in on the documentation issue.
Meanwhile, I'm looking at packages to review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209974
Antti Järvinen antti.jarvi...@katiska.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
62 matches
Mail list logo