https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442
Alec Leamas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leamas.a...@gmail.com
Assignee|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695
--- Comment #5 from Pete Zaitcev ---
Instead of using the CPPFLAGS trick that Alan showed in comment #4,
I chose to apply a patch to configure.am. I'm going to submit it
upstream.
Licensing is not fixed yet.
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203476
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
sslh-1.17-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sslh-1.17-1.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203476
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
sslh-1.17-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sslh-1.17-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202231
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/jbehave.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/jbehave-3.9.5-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203380
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: gherkin - A |Review Request:
|fast
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
boost148-1.48.0-7.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/boost148-1.48.0-7.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
boost148-1.48.0-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/boost148-1.48.0-7.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #10 from Devrim GÜNDÜZ ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: liblas
Short Description: LAS 1.0/1.1/1.2 ASPRS LiDAR data translation toolset
Upstream URL: http://www.liblas.org/
Owners: devrim
Branches: e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
Devrim GÜNDÜZ changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Devri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
boost148-1.48.0-7.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/boost148-1.48.0-7.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210939
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9501012
Well, it builds, but Taskotron will complain once the package is in the repos.
One of the runtime dependencies is unresolvable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693137
Jonathan Underwood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Un
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821727
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Underwood ---
I am afraid I don't have time to maintain this package on my own, no. I'd be
willing to review the package if someone else wanted to lead the charge. I'd
love to see it in Fedora as I put quite a lot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184446
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184446
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693137
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832804
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197709
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821727
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194545
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-cached_property-1.0. |python-cached_property-1.0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183255
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Crypt-Random-Seed-0.03 |perl-Crypt-Random-Seed-0.03
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204898
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
libntirpc-1.2.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204898
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
libntirpc-1.2.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187869
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|kdocker-4.8-2.fc21 |kdocker-4.9-1.el7
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194428
Bug 1194428 depends on bug 1194545, which changed state.
Bug 1194545 Summary: Review Request: python-cached_property - A
cached-property for decorating methods in Python classes.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194545
W
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194545
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678925
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Math-Random-ISAAC-1.00 |perl-Math-Random-ISAAC-1.00
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261
--- Comment #49 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
---
Let me quote:
| If you're using LGPLv3 in your project, be sure to include copies
| of both GPLv3 and LGPLv3, since LGPLv3 is now written as a set of
| additional per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196290
Bug 1196290 depends on bug 1196289, which changed state.
Bug 1196289 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-defaults - A simple one level
options merge utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196289
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196289
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211362
--- Comment #9 from Paulo Andrade ---
I suggest only installing *.ReleaseDynamic, source code will
be in the debuginfo and srpm, and ide project files should not
be installed. Also, instead of having a directory, could remove
it, and in the to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184446
Kushal Das changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Kushal D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212909
--- Comment #1 from Jan Pokorný ---
Was meant to be:
This package will enable *removal* of temporary bundling of clufter
library with pcs as introduced in RHEL 7.1...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182358
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1212909
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212909
Bug ID: 1212909
Summary: New package request: clufter - Tool for
transforming/analyzing cluster configuration formats
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Version: 7.2
Compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Rex D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #7 from Devrim GÜNDÜZ ---
Hi,
Ok, put liblas-config back into the package, and fixed #3:
Spec URL: http://www.gunduz.org/epel/liblas.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.gunduz.org/epel/liblas-1.8.0-3.f21.src.rpm
Regards, Devrim
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter ---
I'd venture liblas-config is built only if pkgconfig is disabled (I'd argue
pkgconfig is superior in that regard).
That said,
15. both the pkgconfig and/or liblas-config MUST be in the -devel subpkg
inste
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212148
--- Comment #10 from Alan Pevec ---
Need to add BuildRequires: python-setuptools
otherwise
File "setup.py", line 39, in
from distribute_setup import use_setuptools
ImportError: No module named distribute_setup
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211488
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
Devrim GÜNDÜZ changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #11 from Devr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
--- Comment #10 from Devrim GÜNDÜZ ---
Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #5 from Devrim GÜNDÜZ ---
Hi,
I think I fixed everything:
Spec URL: http://www.gunduz.org/epel/liblas.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.gunduz.org/epel/liblas-1.8.0-3.f21.src.rpm
One of these changes affected the build though -- we ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Rex D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
--- Comment #8 from Devrim GÜNDÜZ ---
Hi,
Thanks for the tip!
Here you go:
Spec URL: http://www.gunduz.org/epel/laszip.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.gunduz.org/epel/laszip-2.2.0-4.f21.src.rpm
Regards, Devrim
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter ---
for 2, use instead:
%files
%{_libdir}/liblaszip.so.6*
...
%files devel
%{_libdir}/liblaszip.so
As for no cmake, because it isn't needed or used here. This library is
autoconf/automake-based.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211488
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
i have a doubt about this:
unboundid-ldapsdk.noarch: W: invalid-license UnboundID-LDAPSDK
add to Fedora Legal Tracker
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235) the reference of this bug
for know
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211488
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Created attachment 1015612
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1015612&action=edit
fix javadoc errors
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
--- Comment #6 from Devrim GÜNDÜZ ---
BTW, what is the reason of dropping cmake from BR?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212148
Pete Zaitcev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(zait...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
--- Comment #5 from Devrim GÜNDÜZ ---
Hi Rex,
Thanks for the review. I think I fixed most of these, except item #2:
"2. MUST move %{_libdir}/liblaszip.so symlink to -devel subpkg"
How can I do that?
Current versions are here:
Spec URL: h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211488
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212522
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261
--- Comment #48 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) from comment
#47)
> > 1)
>
> Note that .la files are libtool archives and are not related to static libs.
> It's just Fedora's guidelines w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211488
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261
--- Comment #47 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
---
> 1)
Note that .la files are libtool archives and are not related to static libs.
It's just Fedora's guidelines where both .a and .la are covered in the same
section.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212835
Mattias Ellert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1210948
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212835
Bug ID: 1212835
Summary: Review Request: castxml - C-family abstract syntax
tree XML output tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter ---
14. SHOULD build with -DWITH_PKGCONFIG:BOOL=ON flag (unless you have some good
reason not to)
regarding 13 for now, you can use cmake build flag: -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON
as a big hammer to kill rpaths.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
--- Comment #15 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Good to see issues found in packaging and their fixes provided in the review.
Then generally I check few things in the review like package build successfully
in rawhide, source checksum of tarball in srp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter ---
naming: ok
1. license: NOT ok. close though, there's some bundled modified boost headers
included, so MUST use:
License: BSD and Boost
in that vein, due to how dependencies work out, I'd suggest droping
%li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
--- Comment #14 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Hi, I updated all the font packages together, on the 14th.
I have found a few packages that I intend to review, but I have a lot of
reading to do before submitting reviews. Do I need to replicate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter ---
10. MUST fix %build section missing 'make' cmd, I'd suggest adding:
make %{?_smp_mflags}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1199296 (laszip)
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1199298 (liblas)
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||laszip
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9497308
$ rpmlint laszip laszip-devel
laszip.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) compant -> company, compact, com
pant
laszip.i686: W: sp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202265
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #46 from Parag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212148
--- Comment #8 from Alan Pevec ---
They are:
ec_driver = ECDriver(k=1, m=1, ec_type='jerasure_rs_vand')
liberasurecode[27246]: liberasurecode_backend_open: dynamic linking error
libJerasure.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202591
--- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter ---
fwiw, the close button thing is a kwin bug I think (fixed in kwin-5.2.2-2), I
hit it too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208222
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212148
--- Comment #7 from Alan Pevec ---
> See also the packages required by PyECLib:
> bug 1094570: gf-complete
> bug 1095012: jerasure
Those two are blocked on legal issues, are they really required?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695
--- Comment #4 from Alan Pevec ---
> FIX: The sources does not build in F23
> (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9456796):
Mindless quickfix which seems to have worked:
-%configure --disable-static
+%configure --disable-stati
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #2 from Devrim GÜNDÜZ ---
Hi Michael,
Thank you for the comment. I improved the spec file significantly:
Spec URL: http://www.gunduz.org/epel/liblas.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.gunduz.org/epel/liblas-1.8.0-2.f21.src.rpm
Regards,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212522
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212399
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212399
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
--- Comment #2 from Devrim GÜNDÜZ ---
Hi,
Thanks for the review. I fixed most of the stuff, except:
(In reply to Sinny Kumari from comment #1)
>
> Issues found
> -
> * Any significance of having ._configure.ac, ._Makefile.am an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Ala
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212148
--- Comment #6 from Alan Pevec ---
Created attachment 1015512
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1015512&action=edit
pyeclib-1.0.7 from SRPM vs PyECLib-1.0.7 from PyPI
Attaching diff between tarball in SRPM vs tarball from Py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212148
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zait...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212148
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1212670
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212148
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Ala
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212148
--- Comment #3 from Haïkel Guémar ---
1. use %{__python2} and %{__python2_sitelib} instead of
%{__python}/%{__python_sitelib} as we're switching to python3, it could be
confusing.
2. use %{__python2_sitearch} instead of %{_libdir}/python2*/si
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212148
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1212148
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210754
--- Comment #30 from Daniel Kopeček ---
Also, the description of the package in pkgdb is wrong. It should be "JSON for
Modern C++".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210754
--- Comment #29 from Daniel Kopeček ---
Created a rel-eng ticket to unblock the package:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6148
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210754
--- Comment #28 from Daniel Kopeček ---
Well, this is a problematic package... I cannot build it. Koji says:
FAILED: BuildError: package json is blocked for tag f23
and it's the same for other branches.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212399
Alec Leamas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Alec Le
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212399
--- Comment #7 from Alec Leamas ---
New release:
- Removing native/ and *zip files
- The WakeOnLan files are not bundled.
Thanks for review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
99 matches
Mail list logo
