https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172198
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-davecgh-go-spew-0-0.3.git3e6e67c.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172198
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-davecgh-go-spew-0-0.3.git3e6e67c.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172198
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-davecgh-go-spew-0-0.3.git3e6e67c.fc22 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 22.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213599
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141807
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-coreos-go-etcd-2.0.0-0.1.git0424b5f.fc21 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213596
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com ---
1. Fixed
2. Have asked upstream, in the same email as #3
4. Yes, there should, and some other libraries. Added them.
New Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213596
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213595
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com ---
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9522610
I'm only interrested in EPEL7.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213596
Bug ID: 1213596
Summary: Review Request: mediawiki123-openid - Allow users to
login with OpenID
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213599
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213595
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mediawiki123-intersection-1.7.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki123-intersection-1.7.0-1.el7
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213595
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172198
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-davecgh-go-spew-0-0.3.git3e6e67c.fc21 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196361
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-gorilla-websocket-0-0.2.gitecff5aa.fc22 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 22.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196361
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-gorilla-websocket-0-0.2.gitecff5aa.fc21 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213595
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213596
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013
Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|opensou...@till.name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213596
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mediawiki123-openid-4.4.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki123-openid-4.4.0-1.el7
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202591
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202591
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
muon-5.2.2-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/muon-5.2.2-2.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141807
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-coreos-go-etcd-2.0.0-0.1.git0424b5f.fc22 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 22.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213599
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mediawiki123-RSS-2.25.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki123-RSS-2.25.0-1.el7
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213599
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213595
Bug ID: 1213595
Summary: Review Request: mediawiki123-intersection - Create a
list of pages that are listed in a set of categories
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213595
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213596
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPLv2+)
OK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213596
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213599
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com ---
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9522654
I'm only interrested in EPEL7.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213599
Bug ID: 1213599
Summary: Review Request: mediawiki123-RSS - Displays one or
more RSS feeds on a wiki page
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141807
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-coreos-go-etcd-2.0.0-0.1.git0424b5f.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213596
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com ---
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9522614
I'm only interrested in EPEL7.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196361
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-gorilla-websocket-0-0.2.gitecff5aa.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196361
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-gorilla-websocket-0-0.2.gitecff5aa.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209971
Bug 1209971 depends on bug 1210753, which changed state.
Bug 1210753 Summary: Review Request: spdlog - Super fast C++ logging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199055
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199055
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mediawiki123-1.23.9-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki123-1.23.9-1.el7
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212699
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212699
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mediawiki123-HTTP302Found-2.0.1-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki123-HTTP302Found-2.0.1-3.el7
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #13)
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11)
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #10)
Sorry i don't understand.
Agree about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211346
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211346
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111
Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|l...@redhat.com |mgold...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178911
Jan Pokorný jpoko...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180723
Jan Pokorný jpoko...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211346
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211346
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #14 from Gerald Cox gb...@bzb.us ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) from comment
#12)
What becomes easier?
You can rearrange the lines in your spec file to move Name:, Version:
and Release: to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #13 from Gerald Cox gb...@bzb.us ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11)
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #10)
Sorry i don't understand.
Agree about what?
Those files should be removed before to compile because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178912
Jan Pokorný jpoko...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #16 from Gerald Cox gb...@bzb.us ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15)
Okay but does copyq need it or not?
In both cases a way out exists.
Thanks again for your quick replies and help.
Yes, copyq needs the files.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
Petr Lautrbach plaut...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||plaut...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211488
--- Comment #8 from Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
http://plain.resources.ovirt.org/repos/staging/ldapsdk-3/unboundid-ldapsdk.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #17 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
I'm gonna look through my disk to find my spec and post it here if there are
any substantial differences.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
%global name copyq
%global version 2.4.6
%global release 1
It's a stylistic choice, I think it makes it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
liblas-1.8.0-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liblas-1.8.0-3.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211488
--- Comment #7 from Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #6)
i have a doubt about this:
unboundid-ldapsdk.noarch: W: invalid-license UnboundID-LDAPSDK
add to Fedora Legal Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
liblas-1.8.0-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liblas-1.8.0-3.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211488
Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #11 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #10)
Antonio,
I got a response from upstream. Basically the few files that were from
qt-examples the developer needed to make some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
liblas-1.8.0-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liblas-1.8.0-3.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
liblas-1.8.0-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liblas-1.8.0-3.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
liblas-1.8.0-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liblas-1.8.0-3.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
liblas-1.8.0-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liblas-1.8.0-3.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Petr Lautrbach from comment #2)
40 cp -vR include/spdlog %{buildroot}%{_includedir}
You should use 'cp -p' or 'install -p' to preserve timestamps.
Fixed.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
--- Comment #4 from Petr Lautrbach plaut...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237333
--- Comment #13 from Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA
New Branches: el7
Owners: hardaker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237333
Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
--- Comment #5 from Petr Lautrbach plaut...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Petr Lautrbach from comment #4)
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202591
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=408171
Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237338
--- Comment #15 from Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: perl-Net-DNS-SEC
New Branches: el7
Owners: hardaker pwouters
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237338
Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs-
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~dkopecek/usbguard/spdlog.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~dkopecek/usbguard/spdlog-0-3.20150410git.211ce99.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209971
--- Comment #19 from Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~dkopecek/usbguard/usbguard.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~dkopecek/usbguard/usbguard-0.3p3-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202591
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
Petr Lautrbach plaut...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|plaut...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #18 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #16)
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15)
Okay but does copyq need it or not?
In both cases a way out exists.
Thanks again
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #19 from Gerald Cox gb...@bzb.us ---
Antonio what about this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Treatment_Of_Bundled_Libraries
Conditionalized functionality
Packages which bundle specific subsets of third-party source code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212699
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #22 from Gerald Cox gb...@bzb.us ---
I submitted this question to the Fedora packagers list:
I am working on packaging a program which includes a very small subset of files
from these packages.
From qt-examples, there are four
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=408171
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237333
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=408171
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
--- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #21 from Gerald Cox gb...@bzb.us ---
Antonio,
What I am saying is that this particular instance I believe falls under the
category of Conditionalized functionality. The package does not bundle the
entire library, only a subset.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177453
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jxmpp-0.4.1-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jxmpp-0.4.1-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211346
--- Comment #6 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Thanks. Pushed to Rawhide for now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #20 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #19)
Antonio what about this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Treatment_Of_Bundled_Libraries
Conditionalized functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212909
Dean Jansa dja...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dja...@redhat.com
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202591
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202591
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196290
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
