https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203134
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Remi Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203132
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Remi Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206737
Cleber Rosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Cle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215342
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Kalev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215341
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Kalev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215341
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215342
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215341
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215342
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215342
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Yeah, I don't see anything else on this subject in the guidelines. Package
builds fine and seems to provide the old .so version correctly. Let's hope we
don't need it for too long.
Package i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206739
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190390
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|carbon-c-relay-0.39-2.el6 |carbon-c-relay-0.39-2.el7
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201662
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190390
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|carbon-c-relay-0.39-2.fc22 |carbon-c-relay-0.39-2.el6
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215342
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember ---
Thanks Zbigniew!
I don't know of any explicitly written down guidelines and Toshio's post is
probably the best we have.
The rule of thumb that I've always tried to follow is to use the compat- prefix
when
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215341
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
fedora-review has nothing interesting to say, I'll not paste the full output
here, except for rpmlint.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: compat-libcdio15-0.92-1.fc23.i686.rpm
compat-libcdi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215342
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
fedora-review has nothing interesting to say, I'll not paste the full output
here, except for rpmlint.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: compat-libcdio-paranoia1-10.2+0.90+1-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204445
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215341
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215342
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203132
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203132
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1018903
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1018903&action=edit
fedora-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
Command line :/usr/b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203132
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203134
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203134
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1018902
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1018902&action=edit
fedora-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
Command line :/usr/b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204445
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203134
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204445
--- Comment #5 from William Moreno ---
Spec URL:
https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/python-email_reply_parser.spec
SRPM URL:
https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/python-email_reply_parser-0.3.0-20140523git76e9481.fc21.s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208001
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Depends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Depends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211362
--- Comment #16 from Paulo Andrade
---
As far as I could check, the samples that create output
files, write them to the current directory. If some sample
uses a prefix to choose the name, it probably should not
be too difficult to patch.
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206826
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
z3-4.3.2-3.20150329git.29606b5.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/z3-4.3.2-3.20150329git.29606b5.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206826
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206826
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
z3-4.3.2-3.20150329git.29606b5.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/z3-4.3.2-3.20150329git.29606b5.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #53 from Gerald Cox ---
If the above description is too long, use this one.
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: copyq
Short Description: copyq - Advanced Qt based clipboard manager
Upstream URL: http://s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204445
--- Comment #4 from William Moreno ---
Spec URL:
https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/python-email_reply_parser.spec
SRPM URL:
https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/python-email_reply_parser-0.3.0-20140523git76e9481.fc21.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
Gerald Cox changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #52 from Gerald
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1215354
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215354
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||505154 (FE-SCITECH)
Referenced Bugs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215354
Bug ID: 1215354
Summary: Review Request: assimulo - Ordinary differential and
differential algebraic equations solver
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #51 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215345
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #50 from Gerald Cox ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #49)
> (In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #48)
> > Antonio,
> How this issue can influence user experience with copyq on Gnome?
Under normal operation I don't thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208101
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Kopeček ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #8)
> Fedora yajl maintainer denied the extension. So we can:
> ...
> (2) Fork yajl in Fedora.
Fork and maintain it there under a different name or use an already exi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215345
Bug ID: 1215345
Summary: Review Request: stella - A multi-platform Atari 2600
VCS emulator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215342
--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember ---
For reference, here's the diff to the F21 libcdio-paranoia package:
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/215478/
I'd like to keep the diff to the original package down to the minimum in order
to be able to easil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215341
--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember ---
For reference, here's the diff to the F21 libcdio package:
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/215477/
I'd like to keep the diff to the original package down to the minimum in order
to be able to easily share f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344
Bug ID: 1215344
Summary: Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy
modules for plowshare
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #49 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #48)
> Antonio,
>
> I tested under gnome and the tests fail for me also. Looks like an
> incompatibility with the desktop, so appears you need a kde or lxqt
> enviro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215341
--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember ---
Err, accidentally linked to a binary rpm instead of the srpm above. Here are
corrected links:
Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/compat-libcdio15.spec
SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/compat-l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215342
Bug ID: 1215342
Summary: Review Request: compat-libcdio-paranoia1 - Compat
package with libcdio-paranoia libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215341
Bug ID: 1215341
Summary: Review Request: compat-libcdio15 - Compat package with
libcdio libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #4 from marcindulak ---
Update:
Spec URL:
https://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/exciting/r01.new/exciting.spec
SRPM URL:
https://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/exciting/r01.new/exciting-7-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #48 from Gerald Cox ---
Antonio,
I tested under gnome and the tests fail for me also. Looks like an
incompatibility with the desktop, so appears you need a kde or lxqt environment
to run. Not sure if it would work with kwin under
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028
--- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188105
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla ---
Fedora review flag not set.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188105
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166092
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166092
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Branch exists.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202265
Sinny Kumari changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #47 from Gerald Cox ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #45)
> (In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #44)
> > Antonio, I think I missed something big here. When you mentioned you
> > couldn't run copyq that set off some al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #46 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #41)
> >
> > - Have you looked why some tests fail ?
> The tests all run fine for me. http://goo.gl/dHoKlS
> Remember, these tests are not intended for packaging, a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #45 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #44)
> Antonio, I think I missed something big here. When you mentioned you
> couldn't run copyq that set off some alarm bells...
>
> Requires: qt, qtwebkit,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787350
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Rusinov ---
Looks like rspec-puppet folks submitted a workaround:
https://github.com/rodjek/rspec-puppet/issues/56
It's not ideal but as far as I can see there should be no dependency cycle
anymore.
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #44 from Gerald Cox ---
Antonio, I think I missed something big here. When you mentioned you couldn't
run copyq that set off some alarm bells...
Requires: qt, qtwebkit, libXtst, libXfixes
That is a big embarrassing oops...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206737
--- Comment #9 from Athmane Madjoudj ---
Sorry, it was copy-and-paste typo, here's SRPM url:
SRPM:
https://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/fabric-el6/python-paramiko1.10-1.10.1-2.el6.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #43 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #41)
>
> >
> > - copyq does not work for me.
> That is strange, I have run it on two separate machines with no problem.
> This probably would be an instance where y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #42 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #41)
> >
> > - Have you looked why some tests fail ?
> The tests all run fine for me. http://goo.gl/dHoKlS
> Remember, these tests are not intended for packaging, a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #41 from Gerald Cox ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #40)
>
> Gerald, you can follow Michael's advice of course.
Antonio, if you know of another method to resolve the duplicate file issue,
please let me know. I am a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206737
--- Comment #8 from Cleber Rosa ---
Athmane,
Sorry but the SRPM is missing. The link actually points to the noarch RPM.
Can you please upload the SRPM so that I can do another review.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #40 from Antonio Trande ---
> There is _nothing wrong_ with a longer explicit %files section,
> which only includes what %find_lang doesn't
> (not limited to the /usr/share/copyq/locale directory). If Gerald prefers
>
> %dir %{_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203134
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Update to 1.0.1
Spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/3d35747a03d31a4815467b0a454814d6d5a516f2/php/pecl/php-pecl-apfd/php-pecl-apfd.spec
Srpm: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206737
--- Comment #7 from Athmane Madjoudj ---
Thanks for the patches, please find the updated SPEC and SRPM.
SPEC: https://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/fabric-el6/python-paramiko1.10.spec
SRPM:
https://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/fabric-el6/py
74 matches
Mail list logo
