https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223627
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
fllog-1.2.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fllog-1.2.0-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
fllog-1.2.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fllog-1.2.0-1.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
fllog-1.2.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fllog-1.2.0-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System ---
flamp-2.2.02-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flamp-2.2.02-2.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System ---
flamp-2.2.02-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flamp-2.2.02-2.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System ---
flamp-2.2.02-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flamp-2.2.02-2.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173625
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from Robin Lee -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1225692
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224390
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1225692
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829097
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1225692
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1225692
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055837
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1225692
Flags|needinfo?(rich
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richmat...@gmail.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093522
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richmat...@gmail.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093521
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richmat...@gmail.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093516
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richmat...@gmail.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060920
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1225692
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
--- Comment #37 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223673
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nonamed...@gmail.com
Fl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223673
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220779
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Ding-Yi Chen from comment #3)
> As legal team said, music does not have correct term.
You could use autodownloader to request from user to download additional (but
optional) content. Look at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225648
--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember ---
For reference, here's the diff to the F22 libvpx package:
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/226292
I'd like to keep the diff to the original package down to the minimum in order
to be able to easily share fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225648
Bug ID: 1225648
Summary: Review Request: compat-libvpx1 - Compat package with
libvpx libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #36 from Richa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #17 from Richa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs-
--- Comment #16 from Richa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
--- Comment #15 from Richard Shaw ---
Ok, all 3 fixed! Thanks for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #35 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221293
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221293
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
--- Comment #34 from Richard Shaw ---
SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flamp.spec
SRPM: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flamp-2.2.02-2.fc21.src.rpm
* Wed May 27 2015 Richard Shaw - 2.2.02-2
- Use %%license macro where appropriat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
--- Comment #33 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #32)
> Are all the blockers resolved at this point?
Please, post definitive SPEC/SRPM files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #13 from Richard Shaw ---
Do you still see the licensing as a blocker?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804
--- Comment #32 from Richard Shaw ---
Are all the blockers resolved at this point?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
--- Comment #13 from Richard Shaw ---
Tom, do you have time to review this package? It should be pretty
straightforward now with the new xmlrpc library.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222690
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221293
Zuzana Svetlikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Z
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199285
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-inflight-1.0.4-5.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-inflight-1.0.4-5.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199285
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222690
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013
--- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System ---
proxychains-ng-4.8.1-8.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/proxychains-ng-4.8.1-8.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166919
--- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski ---
Would you be okay with this?
--- a/python-fastcache.spec
+++ b/python-fastcache.spec
@@ -6,20 +6,26 @@
Name: python-%{pkgname}
Version:1.0.2
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013
--- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System ---
proxychains-ng-4.8.1-8.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/proxychains-ng-4.8.1-8.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc21 |fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc20
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224420
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223549
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221272
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207847
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194926
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221545
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196373
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|stockfish-7-0.3.20150506git |stockfish-7-0.3.20150506git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168260
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206946
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168260
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Parse-Debian-Packages- |perl-Parse-Debian-Packages-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168263
Bug 1168263 depends on bug 1168260, which changed state.
Bug 1168260 Summary: Review Request: perl-Parse-Debian-Packages - Parse the
data from a debian Packages.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168260
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc22 |fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc21
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221212
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
xdg-app-0.2-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218025
Pavel Odvody changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james.ant...@redhat.com
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222690
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224385
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #20 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
silly question:
can you use texlive-pdftex-bin and texlive-tex-bin
for re-generate documentation and htm files
using make_doc script?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Math-Base-Convert-0.08-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Math-Base-Convert-0.08-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Math-Base-Convert-0.08-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Math-Base-Convert-0.08-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113310
--- Comment #26 from Erik Johnson ---
Sorry for the extended delay on this. Updated SPEC and SRPM with license file
added. See below links:
SRPM:
https://terminalmage.fedorapeople.org/pkg_review/python-libnacl-1.4.2-1.fc22.src.rpm
SPEC: https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013
--- Comment #58 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220779
--- Comment #3 from Ding-Yi Chen ---
As legal team said, music does not have correct term.
Comment #2 also addressed.
Spec URL: https://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/7kaa.spec
SRPM URL: https://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/7kaa-2.14.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225406
--- Comment #3 from Michal Srb ---
Updated spec+srpm:
Spec URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/2/rubygem-jruby-openssl.spec
SRPM URL:
https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/2/rubygem-jruby-openssl-0.9.7-2.fc23.src.rpm
%changelog
* Wed May 27 2015 Mic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184446
--- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
any updates here? can this be closed now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225406
--- Comment #2 from Josef Stribny ---
* This package is intended for JRuby only and fails on CRuby, so proper
Requires: jruby should be used.
# irb
irb(main):001:0> require 'jopenssl/load'
Loading jruby-openssl in a non-JRuby interpreter
Load
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062315
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151462
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|panem...@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157273
--- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
if there will be no updates here in next 15 days I am going to remove myself
from this review just to make sure I have not to work on this :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Petr Ša
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969820
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
latest build:
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9857007
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013
Pranav Kant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013
--- Comment #57 from Pranav Kant ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: proxychains-ng
Short Description: Redirect connections through proxy servers
Upstream URL: https://github.com/rofl0r/proxychains-ng
Owners: pran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969820
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jclouds.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jclouds-1.9.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
- update to 1.9.0
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9856858
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225406
Josef Stribny changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225406
Michal Srb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1198676
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225406
Bug ID: 1225406
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-jruby-openssl - JRuby's
OpenSSL gem
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223831
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1218315
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219411
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Since there's already a python3 package in Fedora, I'll comment on the diff
between the current master and this package.
My comments are inlined in the diff below, and start with "--> "
@@ -16,3 +16,3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218025
--- Comment #6 from James Antill ---
The stupid incoherent-version-in-changelog warning still persists, because of
the way I'm building the new rpms without adding changelogs atm. I think I've
fixed up everything else though. Blob specfile URL
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo