https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242328
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10338522
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242328
--- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Fixing incorrect URL.
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mizdebsk/newpkg/b622854ae711b3d0312fb5977e38c687992a7a9b/takari-tycho-support.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/cli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242328
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242328
Bug ID: 1242328
Summary: Review Request: takari-tycho-support - Takari Tycho
Base
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459
--- Comment #4 from Marcin Haba ---
Hello Dave,
About blocker #1216264, right. I missed this blocker in this ticket. Thanks for
point me this SWIG binding bug in subversion-python.
Also thanks for explain Mercurial me dependecies.
I will ba
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459
--- Comment #3 from Dave Johansen ---
(In reply to Marcin Haba from comment #1)
> During build process occurs following traceback:
This is a problem with the SWIG bindings in subversion-python. See blocker
bugzilla (#1216264).
(In reply to Ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114215
--- Comment #1 from František Dvořák ---
Spec URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-ws-test-1.4.11-1/glite-lb-ws-test.spec
SRPM URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-ws-test-1.4.11-1/glite-lb-ws-test-1.4.11-1.fc23.src.rpm
Chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242289
Danilo Falcão changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Depends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242289
Danilo Falcão changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242289
Bug ID: 1242289
Summary: Review Request: rubygems-fpm - Ruby Package Builder
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=127
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
breathe-4.0.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/breathe-4.0.0-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=127
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
breathe-4.0.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/breathe-4.0.0-1.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=127
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
breathe-4.0.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/breathe-4.0.0-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=127
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231459
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
I'll do a koji build once osmpbf is in rawhide, and I'll look at the doc thing.
It's only the devel package that is noarch (as described in the comment at the
top) so the tests should run everywhere - that s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231459
Jeff Backus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeff.bac...@gmail.com
Assignee|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231458
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Tom Hug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231458
Jeff Backus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Jeff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #16 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-6.6-0.fc22.src.rpm
I updated to the new upstream (6.6), and created a subpackage for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241944
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242056
--- Comment #4 from Paulo Andrade ---
Some extra comments. I see you were following documentation :)
Since I am actually not much experienced with ruby, I was
checking all build stages, and noticed that %gem_install
receives a -d argument, tha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223990
--- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck ---
Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/openssl101e.spec
SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/openssl101e-1.0.1e-2.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242056
Paulo Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231460
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
New upstream version:
Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/osmium-tool.spec
SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/osmium-tool-1.1.1-1.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231459
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
New upstream version:
Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/libosmium.spec
SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/libosmium-2.2.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231458
--- Comment #8 from Tom Hughes ---
New version:
Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/osmpbf.spec
SRPM URL:
http://download.compton.nu/tmp/osmpbf-1.3.3-5.20150712git17fd0cc.fc22.src.rpm
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236328
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239148
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: thefuck
Short Description: This application corrects your previous console command
Upstream URL: https://github.com/nvbn/thefuck
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240116
--- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
There's nothing "usual" about that practice. It was introduced only because
2to3 was used to modify sources during build, so the same directory could not
be used for both 2.x and 3.x. But thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231458
Jeff Backus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeff.bac...@gmail.com
Assignee|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242011
Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239273
--- Comment #10 from Julien Enselme ---
> 1) the main packages does not need golang as a runtime dependency
> 2) if you keep Requires: golang in devel subpackage it will brings troubles
> to > secondary architectures as there is not golang on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202805
Jibec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb.holcr...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Ji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186558
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
- In the build-log i see:
+ appstream-util validate-relax --nonet
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gfm-1.07-1.fc23.x86_64//usr/share/appdata/gfm.appdata.xml
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gfm-1.07-1.fc23.x86_64//usr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239273
--- Comment #9 from Jan Chaloupka ---
You are welcome.
> I clean the unseful Require and Provides.
1) the main packages does not need golang as a runtime dependency
2) if you keep Requires: golang in devel subpackage it will brings troubles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239273
--- Comment #8 from Julien Enselme ---
Jan, thanks for your advise. I just updated the spec and srpm based on the one
you post as an attachment. gofed lint reports no problem. I clean the unseful
Require and Provides.
I added %dir %{gopath}/s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239273
--- Comment #7 from Jan Chaloupka ---
> Shouldn't the -devel package require the main package?
No. As the main packages provides only binaries and once build it does not
depend on its source codes.
> will be located in /usr/share/gocode/src/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241919
--- Comment #4 from Jackson Isaac ---
(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #3)
> Your package is not buildable due to missing dependencies. As communicated
> earlier, try running fedora-review on it:
>
> fedora-review -b 1241919
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241944
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Underwood ---
(In reply to Marcin Haba from comment #9)
> Thanks for kind words and Spec update.
>
> I checked your latest package 0.1.3-3. RPMs packages install well and work
> for me, at least in interactive py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241944
--- Comment #9 from Marcin Haba ---
Thanks for kind words and Spec update.
I checked your latest package 0.1.3-3. RPMs packages install well and work for
me, at least in interactive python and python.3.4 mode the module imports
successfully.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239273
--- Comment #6 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Better inspiration are spec files of etcd or cadvisor packages.
> In my opinion, the fact that /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/BurntSushi
> shouldn't cause trouble the the files for golang-github-BurntS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239273
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|text/x-matlab |text/plain
#1051097 mime type|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239273
--- Comment #5 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Created attachment 1051097
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1051097&action=edit
spec file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239273
--- Comment #4 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Hi Julien, Jonathan,
thanks for cc'ing me.
To generate a spec file for a golang project, you can use gofed tool [1].
It is already packaged in Fedora. If you install the latest build in rawhide,
you can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241944
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Underwood ---
@Marcin - good catch on the six.py bundling, and thanks for the informal
review, very helpful.
@William Thanks for the %%check catch, good eyes! I've changed the URL to not
use the macro. However, pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241944
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Underwood ---
Spec URL: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/python-importmagic.spec
SRPM URL: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/python-importmagic-0.1.3-3.fc22.src.rpm
* Sun Jul 12 2015 Jonathan Underwood - 0.1.3-3
- Fix ty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239273
--- Comment #3 from Julien Enselme ---
New SRPM:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SRPMS/golang-github-BurntSushi-toml-test-0.2.0-0.2git85f50d0.fc22.src.rpm
New SPEC:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SPECS/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239273
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jchal...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 f
49 matches
Mail list logo