https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241614
--- Comment #5 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Thanks.
This is still fairly simple. You should see some other perl packages ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241614
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223887
Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
Boris Ranto bra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244196
Bug ID: 1244196
Summary: Review Request: qt5-qtwebengine - Qt5 - QtWebEngine
components
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243915
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1131085
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243782
--- Comment #3 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
Upstream release 1.0.2 version but forgot to tag it, I have now used license.md
as source1 and updated this package.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242663
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Hash-Layout-1.02-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hash-Layout-1.02-2.fc22
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242663
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241614
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243499
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244196
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244196
Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241156
Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1243922
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241614
--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
Are you sure about the license? http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Reflow/
says Perl 5 license (artistic 1 and gpl 1). Source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102
Bug ID: 1244102
Summary: Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX
licenses list and validation library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102
--- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
No urgency... until https://github.com/composer/composer/pull/4264 is merged...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241838
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241838
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
yubico-piv-tool-1.0.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yubico-piv-tool-1.0.1-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184446
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tunir-0.6-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tunir-0.6-3.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111
--- Comment #7 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
Hi Marek, can we please get this one moving?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111
--- Comment #8 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
Michael, hope you're still interested in getting this in, if it helps makes
things easier, just 1 scratch build for the latest stable or rawhide should be
fine for package reviews.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383
--- Comment #9 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
Mmm I thought in SPEC.
Using --nogpg due to errors in GPG checks when building chrootdir for another
Fedora version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
Boris Ranto bra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225648
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
Nice, thanks Zbigniew! I'll fix these up in both libvpx and the new compat
package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225648
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
--- Comment #14 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com ---
Newer koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10389523
Spec URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/consul/consul.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383
--- Comment #8 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl ---
@Mosaab
It is in rpm in /usr/bin/mkchroot:47:
yum -y --nogpg --installroot=$directory --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fcdm
install yum
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243499
José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Update:
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/8162d32cbf9e0470aa078d252c2487c9eab125f8
Spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
New spec file and source rpm.
Spec URL:
https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/fonts/gdouros/gdouros-asea-fonts/gdouros-asea-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119986
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111
--- Comment #9 from Michael Hampton er...@ioerror.us ---
Oh yes I'm still interested. I will create new scratch builds shortly as it
seems the ones above are no longer in koji.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
I don't think this makes sense to make this into a package. We are moving to
dnf, so new dependencies on yum should not be added. dnf deals with chroot
installation just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228868
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
Fixed the links above and added license text and appstream validation check to
the spec file.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111
--- Comment #10 from Michael Hampton er...@ioerror.us ---
Spec URL: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2449/docker-compose.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2449/docker-compose-1.2.0-3.fc24.src.rpm
Scratch builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148331
Bug 1148331 depends on bug 1148329, which changed state.
Bug 1148329 Summary: EPEL-7 branch: gmrun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148329
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148329
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Hm, one more thing: why not just build use a single source package for
Alexander/Anaktoria/Aroania/Asea ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151839
--- Comment #6 from Pranav Kant pranav...@gmail.com ---
| Major events
|
| September 2014 - Snowball site and software no longer being
| actively maintained
| The code has all been loaded into Github, and we may still
| make very occasional
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #11 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #10)
Hm, one more thing: why not just build use a single source package for
Alexander/Anaktoria/Aroania/Asea ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244315
Bug ID: 1244315
Summary: Review Request: rpmdistro-gitoverlay - Manage an
overlay repository of RPMs from upstream git
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228868
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228868
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228868
Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #7)
%description seems to contain a private use unicode character (1480
1561).
Thanks, there was a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228868
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244014
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219905
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-cliff-tablib-1.1-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235305
Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184446
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241944
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
--- Comment #27 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
oops please discard above comment it should be for other bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #17 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #16)
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #15)
I have no concern over adding more text in the spec file but its place
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207280
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233167
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233168
Bug 1233168 depends on bug 1233167, which changed state.
Bug 1233167 Summary: Review Request: python-monotonic - An implementation of
time.monotonic() for Python 2 3.3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233167
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241838
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #14 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
I have already pushed updates with the license comment like this for more than
half of the gdouros fonts, what should I do?
For the time being, given how Mr Douros' page
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201176
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155829
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|openvas-gsa-6.0.3-4.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233167
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-monotonic-0.1-1.fc22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241419
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231458
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
--- Comment #26 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
I don't think it is really mandatory to add license text in the spec file as
the text given in the upstream website already matches with the definition of
Public Domain license given
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #15 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
In Fedora rpm packaging, I will suggest whenever something extra you need to
add in spec file, good to add it just before the start of that relevant
section/line.
I have no concern
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236328
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241156
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219905
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-cliff-tablib-1.1-1.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242663
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207280
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-semantic_version-2.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235422
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865
--- Comment #16 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #15)
I have no concern over adding more text in the spec file but its place at
top of the spec file.
OK, got it. I'll rearrange
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244352
Bug ID: 1244352
Summary: add openjpeg2000 driver for gdal
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241423
Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244353
Bug ID: 1244353
Summary: Review Request: ossim - Open Source Software Image Map
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231459
--- Comment #9 from Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com ---
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the update. Package looks fine except the doc subpackage needs a
copy of the license. Please add that and I'll approve. Thanks!
Package Review
==
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241423
Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
94 matches
Mail list logo