https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063039
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
Bug ID: 1245270
Summary: Review Request: secilc - The SELinux CIL Compiler
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231459
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libosmium-2.2.0-6.fc21,osmpbf-1.3.3-5.20150712git17fd0cc.fc21 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231458
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libosmium-2.2.0-6.fc21,osmpbf-1.3.3-5.20150712git17fd0cc.fc21 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231458
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231459
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
osmpbf-1.3.3-5.20150712git17fd0cc.fc22, libosmium-2.2.0-6.fc22 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231459
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004306
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010557
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047647
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
--- Comment #2 from Petr Lautrbach plaut...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/secilc/secilc.spec
SRPM URL: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/secilc/secilc-2.4-2.fc24.src.rpm
* Tue Jul 21 2015 Petr Lautrbach
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048616
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225231
--- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
Spec URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/locker/light-locker-settings.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/locker/light-locker-settings-1.5.0-2.fc22.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
Miroslav Grepl mgr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245251
Bug ID: 1245251
Summary: Review Request: netspy2ban-1.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm - GUI
Networking Tool and Fail2ban Controller for Fedora 22
Version
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635256
Fotis Georgatos fo...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245255
Bug ID: 1245255
Summary: Review Request: netspy2ban-1.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm - GUI
Networking Tool and Fail2ban Controller for Fedora 22
Version
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060386
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242726
--- Comment #5 from Tim Orling ticot...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL:
https://ttorling.fedorapeople.org/perl-MooX-Log-Any/perl-MooX-Log-Any.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ttorling.fedorapeople.org/perl-MooX-Log-Any/perl-MooX-Log-Any-0.004002-1.fc23.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245251
Fotios Tsiadimos ftsia...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039323
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233963
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077030
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207280
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhriv...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219612
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077030
--- Comment #18 from William Moreno williamjmore...@gmail.com ---
Michael Hrivnak you made a great job with the spec, you can request to become
a comantainer of semantic version.
Please remember than for your firts package you do not need to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242726
Tim Orling ticot...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007619
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009742
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224800
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
epel7 build (with buildroot override for xfce4-vala):
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10427329
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243915
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
* The pinto and pintod apps could be probably subpackaged; would that be
feasible? I'm not sure if there are any other applications using these
modules. Perhaps it doesn't make sense.
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063039
Nitesh Narayan Lal niteshnarayanlal...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244764
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Gradina ilya.grad...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://repo.clanwars.org/gitlab/rubygem-diffy.spec
SRPM URL: http://repo.clanwars.org/gitlab/rubygem-diffy-3.0.7-3.fc24.src.rpm
Koji:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970972
--- Comment #4 from Nils Ratusznik nils.fed...@anotherhomepage.org ---
Hi,
I'm still interrested.
I noticed version 0.7.10 is out, here are the updated files :
Spec URL : http://medias.anotherhomepage.org/rpms/cuisine/0.7.10/cuisine.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
Nitesh Narayan Lal niteshnarayanlal...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242724
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242727
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242723
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781
--- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
- W: fsf-wrong-address for a lot of source files, maybe all.
Sorry, this should mean reference to those E: incorrect-fsf-address messages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242726
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Dist tag is present.
- Sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209054
Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) bugs.mich...@gmx.net
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228942
--- Comment #4 from William Moreno williamjmore...@gmail.com ---
Rawhide Build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10430922
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228943
--- Comment #2 from William Moreno williamjmore...@gmail.com ---
Rawhide build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10431138
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244514
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241919
--- Comment #23 from Jackson Isaac jacksonisaac2...@gmail.com ---
I am symlinking the kernprof binary to kernprof-%{python2_version} and
similarly for %{python3_version}.
But I think, we should cp kernprof to kernprof-%{python2_version} for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018
--- Comment #28 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl ---
Spec URL: http://bacula.pl/downloads/baculum/baculum.spec
SRPM URL: http://bacula.pl/downloads/baculum/baculum-7.0.6-0.6.b.fc22.src.rpm
Hello,
@Dominik: You are right. Duplicate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910340
Sergey Suslov suleman1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244817
Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781
--- Comment #9 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #6)
I am still thinking that the name is misleading, see my comment #2.
The package naming guidelines do not have a strict rule here and even
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245330
Bug ID: 1245330
Summary: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-programoutput -
Extension to insert output of commands into documents
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234905
--- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/py/jpype/jpype.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/py/jpype/jpype-0.6.0-2.src.rpm
Task info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233989
--- Comment #3 from Gerald Cox gb...@bzb.us ---
Sorry, I missed this one:
- Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/lib/gap/pkg/aclib/gap(languages, langpacks:,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229395
--- Comment #3 from Paul W. Frields pfrie...@redhat.com ---
The repositories are meant to have use in the context of a Fedora Workstation
installation, and would not necessarily be applicable (or might not work in
Cloud case) in other
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245351
Bug ID: 1245351
Summary: Review Request: ps2emu-tools - PS/2 recording/playback
tools for ps2emu
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018
--- Comment #27 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl ---
Hello,
Thanks for your suggestions.
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #26)
If this file is modified over time, you should put it somewhere in /var
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241808
Ryan Brown rybr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rybr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
--- Comment #29 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Permissions on files are set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245356
Bug ID: 1245356
Summary: Review Request: python-ansi - ANSI cursor movement and
graphics
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
Daniel E. Wilson d...@bureau-13.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
--- Comment #63
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245356
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077030
--- Comment #16 from William Moreno williamjmore...@gmail.com ---
This app is alredy in Fedora since 2015-05-28
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-semantic_version/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228943
Bug 1228943 depends on bug 1228941, which changed state.
Bug 1228941 Summary: Review Request: python-semantic-version - Python2 library
implementing the 'SemVer' scheme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228941
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228941
William Moreno williamjmore...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228942
Bug 1228942 depends on bug 1228941, which changed state.
Bug 1228941 Summary: Review Request: python-semantic-version - Python2 library
implementing the 'SemVer' scheme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228941
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228942
--- Comment #3 from William Moreno williamjmore...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/python-frappe.spec
SRPM URL:
https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/python-frappe-5.1.3-1.fc22.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241156
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|go-srpm-macros-1-1.fc22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239106
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239222
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|php-myclabs-deep-copy-1.3.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459
Bug 1221459 depends on bug 1216264, which changed state.
Bug 1216264 Summary: subversion-python broken: causing ViewVC to fail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216264
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239107
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243499
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-configparser-3.5.0b2-0.2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-configparser-3.5.0b2-0.2.fc22
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
--- Comment #19 from Boris Ranto bra...@redhat.com ---
@Kevin: I just checked my fas account and I am in the packager group and I use
the aforementioned e-mail there. I'm not sure what went wrong in the script
though. Maybe a network fluke?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #11)
Though, I don't see any reason why beta target is needed, do you mean to
put in Release? Version 0.6.4 is official with no beta hint at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243499
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-configparser-3.5.0b2-0.2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-configparser-3.5.0b2-0.2.fc21
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077030
--- Comment #15 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
I agree that moving the _licencedir stuff to the top makes sense, but when I
do so, the el6 build reports this error:
It is weird. I have no idea why it is happening. Ok, you can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018
--- Comment #26 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net ---
(In reply to Marcin Haba from comment #23)
For now I would solve this error:
baculum-httpd.noarch: E: non-readable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239222
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233988
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241156
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228869
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231459
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751119
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222662
--- Comment #1 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz
claudiorodr...@pereyradiaz.com.ar ---
Spec URL: https://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/notify-sharp3.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241614
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679980
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231459
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234791
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233963
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233963
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243507
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243507
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
[1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/vondruch/doublecmd/
I decided to not like building from subversion, at least not for an official
package and if there's no patch needed.
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo