https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225229
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
External Bug ID|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
Stefan Nuxoll changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Nuxoll ---
Got the EPEL scratch build working with a patch to setup.py, the src rpm and
spec file linked have been updated with the changes:
EPEL7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10445673
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Nuxoll ---
I suppose I should note that this is my first package and that I will need a
sponsor.
This package has completed a successful Koji scratch build on:
Fedora 22: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
Bug ID: 1245889
Summary: Review Request: python-pymssql - Microsoft SQL Server
adapter for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227334
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245852
Bug ID: 1245852
Summary: Review Request: mingw-lua51 - MinGW Windows Library
providing Lua 5.1 programming language
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243507
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Algorithm-LUHN-1.01-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Algorithm-LUHN-1.01-3.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243507
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Algorithm-LUHN-1.01-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Algorithm-LUHN-1.01-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245845
Bug ID: 1245845
Summary: Review Request: python-scandir - faster version of
os.walk included in PY3.5
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189269
--- Comment #13 from Raphael Groner ---
Mario, please try to reproduce comment #11 in Fedora 22. I could access my
stick with QtParted but it's retired cause of dead upstream (log of
2015-06-10).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459
--- Comment #10 from Marcin Haba ---
Hello,
After download latest subversion 1.8.13-7 packages from here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=669141
and update:
# dnf update subversion-libs-1.8.13-7.fc22.x86_64.rpm
subvers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154218
--- Comment #16 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/graphite-api.spec
SRPM URL:
https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/graphite-api-1.0.1-4.20150702gitbe7907c.fc22.src.rpm
Updated spec and srpm:
- removed epel support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233989
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Jerry J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233989
--- Comment #6 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #5)
> In any event, it's working now, so I'm approving this before something else
> breaks... ;-)
Ha! Thank you so much once again for the reviews. I owe you a few. P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459
--- Comment #9 from Marcin Haba ---
Same plugin is loaded as shows below command:
# hg help hgsubversion
hgsubversion extension - integration with Subversion repositories
hgsubversion is an extension for Mercurial that allows it to act as a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459
--- Comment #8 from Marcin Haba ---
Hello,
Thanks for quick reply.
No, I did not enable hgsubversion. Thanks for the link. I have never used
Mercurial before ;-)
It might be good to mention about this step (adding rc file) in documentation,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376
Björn Persson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459
--- Comment #7 from Dave Johansen ---
(In reply to Marcin Haba from comment #5)
> For test I used a random selected SVN repository from fedorahosted:
>
> $ hg clone http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/xmlto/ xmlto-hg
> abort: 'http://svn.fedoraho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245791
Bug ID: 1245791
Summary: Review Request: python-influxdb - Python client for
interacting with InfluxDB
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233989
Gerald Cox changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Geral
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459
--- Comment #6 from Marcin Haba ---
One more info.
On system where I built hgsubversion result RPM I have the subversion libs that
causes SWIG problem:
# dnf list installed subversion*
Last metadata expiration check performed 2:34:25 ago on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921797
--- Comment #59 from Trever Adams ---
George, I haven't looked into it. I am afraid it got lost in the noise of my
work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921797
--- Comment #60 from Trever Adams ---
Until bug 1230373 and bug 1232595 get fixed, I will not be looking at this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459
--- Comment #5 from Marcin Haba ---
Hello,
@Dave:
I noticed that the SWIG bindings bug is already fixed, so I have started review
feature request hgsubversion package.
The result RPM package builds successfully without errors or tracebacks.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243507
Bill Pemberton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #9 from Bill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245765
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1201575
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245754
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1245765
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245765
Bug ID: 1245765
Summary: Review Request: python-traceback2 - Backport of the
traceback module
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245754
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1201575
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245754
Bug ID: 1245754
Summary: Review Request: python-linecache2 - Backport of the
linecache module
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241919
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219612
--- Comment #5 from Troy Dawson ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #3)
> Review:
>
> + Package build successfully in mock F24 x86_64
>
> + rpmlint on all generated rpms gave output
> nodejs-mongodb-core.noarch: W: only-non-binary-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Greg Swift changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(gregswift@gmail.c |needinfo?(karlthered@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
Petr Lautrbach changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(plautrba@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241808
hgue...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1243533
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244764
--- Comment #7 from Vít Ondruch ---
Ok, thx. The package looks good and is ready for approval from my POV. Could
you please apply your newly gained experience to your other package as well?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244764
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Gradina ---
Spec URL: http://repo.clanwars.org/gitlab/rubygem-diffy.spec
SRPM URL: http://repo.clanwars.org/gitlab/rubygem-diffy-3.0.7-4.fc24.src.rpm
rubygem-diffy uses system's "diff" or "ldiff" (from %{_bindir}, tbh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233989
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James ---
Do you happen to have an earlier build of gap-pkg-aclib installed on the
machine where this check is being run (i.e., so that the checker sees the
installed package and thinks that the directory ownership cl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235831
Nikola Forró changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfo...@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242727
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata ---
Based on my feedback from the other two reviews, try to fix this package first.
I would just repeat myself and it will be a good exercise for you :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927883
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #17 from Miro H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958131
--- Comment #15 from Honza Horak ---
With dnf and soft dependencies we might be able to do more, theoretically. But
I'm still not sure if renaming is worth the trouble..
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219612
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Troy Da
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242724
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata ---
Nothing really new here so I'll be brief. I explained all these in the other
review :) I'll assume this one is going into EL6+ as well.
* The BuildRoot tag can be dropped.
* The perl version constraint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241808
hgue...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hgue...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245640
Bug ID: 1245640
Summary: Review Request: msed - Tools to manage the activation
and use of self encrypting drives
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224516
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1245633
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
Daniel Kopeček changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||plaut...@redhat.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Kopeček ---
secilc-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files.
This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early du
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Kopeček ---
secilc.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/secilc.8.gz
The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one
that probably should not be executable. Verify if t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Kopeček ---
Also, during the package build phase, a lot of useless stuff gets compiled
including libsepo.a,.so and some binaries that are removed afterwards. This
only slows down the build of the package and should b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927883
Aviso changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|Patch for tests.py |python-defusedxml-0.4.1-ent
#1054818|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927883
--- Comment #16 from Aviso ---
Created attachment 1054819
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1054819&action=edit
python-defusedxml-0.4.1-format_strings.patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245618
Bug ID: 1245618
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-bgentry-speakeasy -
Golang helpers for reading password input without cgo
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927883
--- Comment #15 from Aviso ---
Created attachment 1054818
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1054818&action=edit
Patch for tests.py
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Kopeček ---
secilc.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsepol
You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded
explicit Requires: tags.
Why does the tool require static linkage to libse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927883
Aviso changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||red...@avram.us
--- Comment #14 from Aviso --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
--- Comment #64 from Miroslav Suchý ---
So does it have sense to persuede this review? You may get more attention if
you start Copr project at:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org
and reopen this review when the SElinux issue settle down (if ever).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241919
--- Comment #25 from Jackson Isaac ---
Revbump to release v4.
Copied the versioned binary of kernprof. I tried to use alternatives system but
it was quite confusing with the post and postun stuff.
Spec URL:
https://jacksonisaac.fedorapeople.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245604
Bug ID: 1245604
Summary: Review Request: vim-go - Go development plugin for Vim
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
Daniel Kopeček changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231460
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
New build to fix a test failure in mock:
Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/osmium-tool.spec
SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/osmium-tool-1.1.1-3.src.rpm
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
consul-0-0.1.git5079177.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/consul-0-0.1.git5079177.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
consul-0-0.1.git5079177.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/consul-0-0.1.git5079177.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
consul-0-0.1.git5079177.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/consul-0-0.1.git5079177.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244514
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
---
%py3dir usage has been removed from the packaging guidelines anyway:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/435
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3APy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157201
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pyn...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151462
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005518
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009754
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963
--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen ---
Ping Pranav :)
Are you able to continue the review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244764
--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch ---
Thanks for the update.
* Better description
- I forgot to mention that the description is not really descriptive :/ Could
you please update the description? Probably the first paragraph from
READM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063053
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063055
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063054
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245356
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dyroff ---
Thanks, fixed. See
Spec URL: http://www.dyroff.net/fedora/python-ansi.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.dyroff.net/fedora/python-ansi-0.1.3-2.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244509
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
--- Comment #5 from Petr Lautrbach ---
Fixed, I accidentally uploaded secilc-2.4-2.fc23.src.rpm instead of
secilc-2.4-2.fc24.src.rpm. Sorry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Kopeček ---
(In reply to Petr Lautrbach from comment #2)
> Spec URL: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/secilc/secilc.spec
> SRPM URL: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/secilc/secilc-2.4-2.fc24.src.rpm
>
> * Tue Jul 21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182358
errata-xmlrpc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212909
Bug 1212909 depends on bug 1182358, which changed state.
Bug 1182358 Summary: New package request: clufter - Tool for
transforming/analyzing cluster configuration formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182358
What|R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245270
Daniel Kopeček changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241919
--- Comment #24 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
I think you should rename kernprof to kernprof-%{python2_version} (or
kernprof-%{python3_version} for the Python 3 build) instead of symlinking.
You might then symlink back the versioned binary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244817
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Matt
86 matches
Mail list logo
