https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244517
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Build fails (on F22) with:
tests/test_4.py:2: in
import wsaccel.utf8validator
E ImportError: No module named 'wsaccel'
1 error in 0.01 seconds ===
err
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244510
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244508
--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ---
I've moved all sorts of new stuff into place but I shouldn't be doing any
significant reorganization, just fixing typos and documenting some of the new
macros.
Do keep in mind that both the "build in one
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244508
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to William Moreno from comment #5)
> "Our method in building from the same code to make the two separate modules
> is to keep each build as independent as possible. To do that, we c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244514
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244678
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245351
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@mayorgalinux.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223455
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@mayorgalinux.com
Fl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191062
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246891
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246891
--- Comment #1 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
NEED WORK:
1- Use compiler flags by default:
!: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244678
--- Comment #2 from Francesco Frassinelli ---
(In reply to Eduardo Mayorga from comment #1)
> Now you must use the %license macro to include the license text instead of
> %docs.
> See:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203749
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment #16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244508
--- Comment #5 from William Moreno ---
@Julien
There is a update to the Python Packaging wiki, please see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_spec_file
Need work:
==
1- There is not more %files please use %files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168432
--- Comment #2 from Julien Enselme ---
- Add Provides: python2-PyMySQL
- Remove usage of %%py3dir
SPEC:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SPECS/python-PyMySQL.spec
SRPM:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201176
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from W
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244508
--- Comment #4 from Julien Enselme ---
SPEC:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SPECS/python-sphinx-theme-alabaster.spec
SRPM:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SRPMS/python-sphinx-theme-alabaster-0.7.6-3.fc2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243379
--- Comment #2 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/tinyxpath.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/tinyxpath-1.3.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
Hi,
Thank you for your reply :D (and yes, tinyxml is my pet peeve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244510
--- Comment #3 from Julien Enselme ---
- Add provides for python2-txaio
- Remove usage of python2 and python3 dirs
- Unbundle jquery
- Don't remove _sources of documentation
I won't use %autosetup as I had problem with line endings when I tri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244678
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@mayorgalinux.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244517
--- Comment #4 from Julien Enselme ---
SPEC:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SPECS/python-wsaccel.spec
SRPM:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SRPMS/python-wsaccel-0.6.2-4.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244508
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@mayorgalinux.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242011
Brian Demers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(brdem...@cisco.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244514
--- Comment #11 from Julien Enselme ---
- Issue about _snappy in global namespace signaled:
https://github.com/andrix/python-snappy/issues/33
- Remove python2 and python3 dirs
- Add Provides: python2-snappy = %{version}-%{release}
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244514
--- Comment #12 from Julien Enselme ---
New SRPMS:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SRPMS/python-snappy-0.5-3.fc22.src.rpm
SPEC:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SPECS/python-snappy.spec
Sorry for double
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247328
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@mayorgalinux.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163559
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242896
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(juj...@jujens.eu) |
--- Comment #3 from Julien Enselme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163559
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156658
Wolfgang Ulbrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154218
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1239336, 1241698|
--- Comment #17 from Piotr Popielu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241919
--- Comment #41 from Till Maas ---
FYI: InitialCC: salimma was not specified in the package change request,
therefore it is not honoured. Also you needed to specify all the branches you
wanted to unretire. I tried to create them now manually.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248080
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248080
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223455
Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223455
Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223455
--- Comment #2 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz
---
Spec URL: https://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mysql-connector-net.spec
SRPM URL:
https://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mysql-connector-net-6.9.6-4.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Mo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237042
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241412
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203749
--- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #14)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13)
>
> I (eventually) made changes to specify boost paths and define
> __global_ldflags.
> I still don't understand
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200889
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206732
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206732
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243530
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244508
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244510
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
The comments about Provides:python2-..., separate build dirs, and _docdir_fmt
from #1244514 also apply here. (I didn't test that build works with a single
source directory, but I'll assume so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244514
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244517
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244510
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244522
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234905
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
NON blocking issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234905
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234905
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Support for both python versions *should* be provided if possible. Many people
are still using py2...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234905
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(bjoern.esser@gmai |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244658
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244658
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203749
--- Comment #14 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13)
I (eventually) made changes to specify boost paths and define __global_ldflags.
I still don't understand why I should define DEBUG for a production
package which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247328
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246177
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lemen...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195573
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|dropbox-api-command-1.17-5. |dropbox-api-command-1.17-5.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195573
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||dropbox-api-command-1.17-5.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246657
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234905
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228503
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242724
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Find-Rule-Age-0.302-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Find-Rule-Age-0.302-3.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242724
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Find-Rule-Age-0.302-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Find-Rule-Age-0.302-3.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242724
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Find-Rule-Age-0.302-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
23.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Find-Rule-Age-0.302-3.fc23
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242724
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Find-Rule-Age-0.302-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Find-Rule-Age-0.302-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242724
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Find-Rule-Age-0.302-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Find-Rule-Age-0.302-3.el7
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242724
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232816
Zuzana Svetlikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1248428
--- Comment #2 from Zuzan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234905
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bjoern.es...@gmail.com |punto...@libero.it
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #14 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Re licensing of spec files: I think it is pretty rare for license files to
include any licensing information at all.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #13 from Dave Love ---
Thanks for the approval. I didn't see a notification about it for some reason.
I'll submit the package when I get back from holiday and have understood the
MPI
changes and checked the docdir comment. Someho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243379
--- Comment #1 from František Dvořák ---
It's funny opencity unbundled the tinyxml from tinyxpath and bundle it itself.
:-) Good catch.
Issues found:
1) License file
Currently it is used the link created automatically by automake, which poi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246724
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1236249
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235831
--- Comment #6 from Nikola Forró ---
A few notes on the spec:
License tag is wrong, it must contain license short name. The license of the
project is actually MIT. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Valid_Licens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199285
Bug 1199285 depends on bug 1223972, which changed state.
Bug 1223972 Summary: nodejs-wrappy is installing in the wrong directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223972
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236565
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-builtins-1.0.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-builtins-1.0.2-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086
--- Comment #147 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to Tomas Curilla from comment #146)
> Please build an epel7 build of elasticsearch for EL7/CentOS7.
> Thank you.
Not a smallest chance. If you wont it in epel. do it on your own. And be
warned -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243379
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193990
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1243379 |
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241412
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241412
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-ldap3-0.9.8.6-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 23.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-ldap3-0.9.8.6-1.fc23
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248029
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237042
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-validate-npm-package-name-2.2.2-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-validate-npm-package-name-2.2.2-2.fc21
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237042
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-validate-npm-package-name-2.2.2-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-validate-npm-package-name-2.2.2-2.fc22
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237042
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-validate-npm-package-name-2.2.2-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 23.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-validate-npm-package-name-2.2.2-2.fc23
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237042
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039301
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-datatype-joda.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-datatype-joda-2.5.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039299
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-module-afterburner.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-module-afterburner-2.5.0b-1.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
91 matches
Mail list logo